Please wait a minute...

中国生物工程杂志

China Biotechnology
China Biotechnology  2013, Vol. 33 Issue (5): 120-124    DOI:
    
Recent Advances in Biological Detoxification of Inhibitors in Lignocellulose Hydrolysate
ZHANG Dong-xu
The Key Laboratory of Industrial Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, School of Biotechnology, Jiangnan University, Wuxi 214122, China
Download: HTML   PDF(406KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  Pretreatment of lignocellulose is an essential step for converting lignocellulose to value-added fuels and chemicals by microbial fermentation. However, during thermo-chemical pretreatment, such as acid hydrolysis and steam explosion, a lot of degradation products such as furans, organic acids and phenolics are formed or released due to the harsh conditions. These degradation products are potential inhibitors to microbial fermentation, leading to low product yield and productivity. A prospective method for removing these toxins is biological detoxification, which has the advantages of simple operation and less generation of waste. One possible biological method is to remove the inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysate before fermentation by using microbes or enzymes. Another way is to use the genetic engineered or adapted (evolutionary engineered) micro-organisms, which obtained the ability to detoxify the inhibitors, to improve the fermentation capability of lignocellulose hydrolysate. We will focus on the biological detoxification methods used to improve ligocellulosic ethanol productivity and yield.

Key wordsLignocellulose      Hydrolysate      Biological detoxification      Inhibitors      Ethanol     
Received: 11 June 2012      Published: 25 May 2013
ZTFLH:  Q533.4  
Cite this article:

ZHANG Dong-xu. Recent Advances in Biological Detoxification of Inhibitors in Lignocellulose Hydrolysate. China Biotechnology, 2013, 33(5): 120-124.

URL:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/     OR     https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/Y2013/V33/I5/120

[1] Klinke H B, Thomsen A B, Ahring B K. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2004, 66: 10-26.
[2] Fonseca B G, Moutta R O, Ferraz F O, et al. Biological detoxification of different hemicellulosic hydrolysates using Issatchenkia occidentalis CCTCC M 206097 yeast. Journal of Industrial Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 38: 199-207.
[3] Zhang J, Zhu Z, Wang X, et al. Biodetoxification of toxins generated from lignocellulose pretreatment using a newly isolated fungus, Amorphotheca resinae ZN1, and the consequent ethanol fermentation. Biotechnology and Biofuels, 2010, 3: 26.
[4] Nichols N N, Dien B S, Guisado G M, et al. Bioabatement to remove inhibitors from biomass-derived sugar hydrolysates. Applied Biochemisty and Biotechnology, 2005, 121-124: 379-390.
[5] Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Szengyel Z, et al. Simultaneous detoxification and enzyme production of hemicellulose hydrolysates obtained after steam pretreatment, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1997, 20: 286-293.
[6] Larsson S, Reimann A, Nilvebrant N O, et al. Comparison of different methods for the detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolyzates of spruce. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1999, 77-79: 91-103.
[7] López M J, Nichols N N, Dien B S, et al. Isolation of microorganisms for biological detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2004, 64: 125-131.
[8] Nichols N N, Sharma L N, Mowery R A, et al. Fungal metabolism of fermentation inhibitors present in corn stover dilute acid hydrolysate. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2008, 42: 624-630.
[9] Schneider H, Selective removal of acetic acid from hardwood-spent sulfite liquor using a mutant yeast, Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 1996, 19: 94-98.
[10] Zhang H R, Qin X X, Silva S S. et al. Novel isolates for biological detoxification of lignocellulosic hydrolysate, applied biochemisty and biotechnology. 2009, 152: 199-212.
[11] Talebnia F, Taherzadeh M J. In situ detoxification and continuous cultivation of dilute-acid hydrolyzate to ethanol by encapsulated S. cerevisiae. Journal of Biotechnology, 2006, 125: 377-384.
[12] Okuda N, Soneura M, Ninomiya K, et al. Biological detoxification of waste house wood hydrolysate using Ureibacillus thermosphaericus for bioethanol production. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2008, 106: 128-133.
[13] Parawira W, Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Critical Review on Biotechnology, 2011, 31: 20-31.
[14] Chandel A K, Silva S. S. da, Singh O V. Detoxification of lignocellulose hydrolysates: Biochemical and metabolic engineering toward white biotechnology. Bioenergy Research, 2013, 6: 388-401
[15] Bleve G, Lezzi C, Mita G, et al. Molecular cloning and heterologous expression of a laccase gene from Pleurotus eryngii in free and immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 79: 731-741.
[16] Chandel A K, Kapoor R K, Singh A, et al. Detoxification of sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate improves ethanol production by Candida shehatae NCIM 3501. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98: 1947-1950.
[17] Martín C, Galbe M, Wahlbom C F, et al. Ethanol production from enzymatic hydrolysates of sugarcane bagasse using recombinant xylose-utilising Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2002, 31: 274-282.
[18] Cho D H, Lee Y J, Um Y, Sang B I, Kim Y H. Detoxification of model phenolic compounds in lignocellulosic hydrolysates with peroxidase for butanol production from Clostridium beijerinckii. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 83: 1035-1043.
[19] Jönsson L J, Palmqvist E, Nilvebrant N O, et al. Detoxification of wood hydrolysate with laccase and peroxidase from the white-rot fungus T. versicolor. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 1998, 49: 691-697.
[20] Almeida J R, Modig T, Petersson A, et al. Increased tolerance and conversion of inhibitors in lignocellulosic hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Journal of Chemical Technology and Biotechnology, 2007, 82: 340-349.
[21] Liu Z L, Slininger P J, Gorsich S W, et al. Enhanced biotransformation of furfural and hydroxymethylfurfural by newly developed ethanologenic yeast strains. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2005, 121-124: 451-460.
[22] Klinke H B, Olsson L, Thomsen A B, et al. Potential inhibitors from wet oxidation of wheat straw and their effect on ethanol production of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: wet oxidation and fermentation by yeast. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2003, 81: 738-747.
[23] Linde M, Galbe M, Zacchi G, et al. Simultaneoussaccharification and fermentation of steam-pretreatedbarley straw at low enzyme loadings and low yeast concentration. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2007, 40: 1100-1107.
[24] Liu Z L. Genomic adaptation of ethanologenic yeast to biomass conversion inhibitors. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 73: 27-36.
[25] Alkasrawi M, Rudolf A, Lidén G, et al. Influence of strain and cultivation procedure on the performance of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of steam pretreated spruce. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 2006, 38: 179-286.
[26] Keller F A, Bates D, Ruiz R, et al. Yeast adaptation on softwood prehydrolysate. Applied Biochemisty and Biotechnology, 1998, 70-72: 137-148.
[27] Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial Biotechnology, 2008, 1: 497-506.
[28] Martin C, Marcet M, Almazan O, et al. Adaptation of a recombinant xylose-utilizing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain to a sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with high content of fermentation inhibitors. Bioresource Technology, 2007, 98: 1767-1773.
[29] Gorsich S W, Dien B S, Nichols N N, et al. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2006, 71: 339-349.
[30] Larsson S, Nilvebrant N O, Jonsson L J. Effect of overexpression of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pad1p on the resistance to phenylacrylic acids and lignocellulose hydrolysates under aerobic and oxygen-limited conditions. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2001, 57: 167-174.
[31] Larsson S, Cassland P, Jonsson L J. Development of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with enhanced resistance to phenolic fermentation inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates by heterologous expression of laccase. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2001, 67: 1163-1170.
[32] Bajwa P K, Shireen T, D’Aoust F, et al. Mutants of the pentose-fermenting yeast Pichia stipitis with improved tolerance to inhibitors in hardwood spent sulfite liquor. Biotechnology and Bioengineering. 2009, 104: 892-900.
[33] Bajwa P K, Phaenark C, Grant N,et al. Ethanol production from selected lignocellulosic hydrolysates by genome shuffled strains of Scheffersomyces stipitis. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102: 9965-9969.
[1] GAO Yin-ling,ZHANG Feng-jiao,ZHAO Gui-zhong,ZHANG Hong-sen,WANG Feng-qin,SONG An-dong. Research Progress of Itaconic Acid Fermentation[J]. China Biotechnology, 2021, 41(5): 105-113.
[2] ZHANG Ye,WANG Ji-ping,SU Tian-ming,HE Tie-guang,WANG Jin,ZENG Xiang-yang. Research Progress on Degradation of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Screening Microorganisms[J]. China Biotechnology, 2020, 40(6): 100-105.
[3] DONG Lu,ZHANG Ji-fu,ZHANG Yun,HU Yun-feng. Immobilization of Extracellaluar Proteases of Bacillus sp. DL-2 Using Epoxy Resin to Asymmetrically Hydrolyze (±)-1-Phenylethyl Acetate[J]. China Biotechnology, 2020, 40(4): 49-58.
[4] SUN Qing,LIU De-hua,CHEN Zhen. Research Progress of Methanol Utilization and Bioconversion[J]. China Biotechnology, 2020, 40(10): 65-75.
[5] Jian YAN,Lu-qiang JIA,Jian DING,Zhong-ping SHI. Enhancing pIFN-α Production by Pichia pastoris via Periodic Methanol Induction Control[J]. China Biotechnology, 2019, 39(6): 32-40.
[6] LI Wen,CHEN Jie,HU Wei-nan,QI Ya-yun,FU Yi-hong,LIU Jia-min,WANG Zhen-chao,OUYANG Gui-ping. Research Advances in the Study of EGFR Mutations Resistance and Its Small Molecule Inhibitors[J]. China Biotechnology, 2019, 39(10): 97-104.
[7] Meng-tong QIN,Jing HU,Guan-hua LI. Recent Developments and Future Prospect of Biological Pretreatment[J]. China Biotechnology, 2018, 38(5): 85-91.
[8] MA Ze-lin, LIU Jia-heng, HUANG Xu, CAIYIN Qing-gele, ZHU Hong-ji. Research Progress on Utilization of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Microorganisms[J]. China Biotechnology, 2017, 37(6): 124-133.
[9] Li-na GU,Liang-zhi LI,Wei-qiang GUO,Jing-sheng GU,Xue-mei YAO,Xin JU. The Regulation on Polyols Production by Trichosporonoides oedocephalis with HOG1 Inhibitors and Its Mechanism[J]. China Biotechnology, 2017, 37(12): 40-48.
[10] Xin-tong CHI,Shao-ming MAO. Optimization of Bioethanol Production by Brown Algae[J]. China Biotechnology, 2017, 37(12): 111-118.
[11] WANG Jing-sheng, WANG Qiu-feng, LI Yong, LIU Yan, ZHANG Xian-chu, LI Bo, DONG Qing-shan, LIU Yue. The Application of Logistic Equation to Simulate Ethanol Fermentation in Different Initial Concentration Reducing Sugar[J]. China Biotechnology, 2017, 37(10): 81-85.
[12] GUO Xue-jiao, ZHA Jian, YAO Kun, WANG Xin, LI Bing-zhi, YUAN Ying-jin. Accelerated Ethanol Production by a Tolerant Saccharomyces cerevisiae to Inhibitor Mixture of Furfural, Acetic Acid and Phenol[J]. China Biotechnology, 2016, 36(5): 97-105.
[13] SHI Hui-lin, SUN Jing-chun, ZHANG Rong-kai, GAO Da-qi, WANG Ze-jian, GUO Mei-jin, ZHOU Li-qin, ZHUANG Ying-ping. Application of the Electronic Nose on the Online Feedback Control of Methanol Concentration during Glucoamylase Fermentation Optimization by Pichia pastoris[J]. China Biotechnology, 2016, 36(3): 68-76.
[14] LIANG Xiang nan, ZHANG Kun, ZOU Shao lan, WANG Jian jun, MA Yuan yuan, HONG Jie fang. Construction and Preliminary Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Co-expressing Three Types of Cellulase Via Cocktail δ-integration[J]. China Biotechnology, 2016, 36(11): 54-62.
[15] ZHANG Xu, DING Jian, GAO Peng, GAO Min-jie, JIA Lu-qiang, TU Ting-yong, SHI Zhong-ping. Fed-batch Culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae with Adaptive Control Based on Differential Evolution Algorithm[J]. China Biotechnology, 2016, 36(1): 68-75.