Please wait a minute...

中国生物工程杂志

CHINA BIOTECHNOLOGY
中国生物工程杂志  2018, Vol. 38 Issue (9): 94-98    DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.20180914
农业生物技术专栏     
国际转基因标识制度变动趋势分析及对我国的启示 *
徐琳杰1,刘培磊2,李文龙1,孙卓婧1,宋贵文1,**()
1 农业农村部科技发展中心 北京 100122
2 农业农村部科技教育司 北京 100125
Analysis of the Recent Trends of International Labeling Policies for Genetically Modified Products and the Enlightenment to China’s Labeling Management
Lin-jie XU1,Pei lei LIU2,Wen-long LI1,Zhuo-jing SUN1,Gui-wen SONG1,**()
1 Development Center for Science and Technology, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100122, China
2 Department of Science, Technology and Education, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100125,China
 全文: PDF(737 KB)   HTML
摘要:

转基因标识与消费者知情权和选择权密切相关,因而成为最受关注的转基因政策之一。从1997年第一个转基因标识制度诞生开始,全球已有70多个国家和地区开展了各具特色的转基因产品标识管理。2015年以来,受转基因产业发展政策、公众接受程度、农产品贸易需求、国家政治立场等多重因素的影响和作用,美国、韩国、俄罗斯、乌克兰和日本等国家相继着手调整转基因标识政策或改变实施细则,呈现出强制标识呼声高、标识范围扩大、标注方式更加明确、阴性标识更规范等特点。通过分析国际转基因标识制度及变动趋势,提出了我国转基因标识在扩大标识范围、设立标识豁免阈值和规范阴性标识等方面的管理建议。

关键词: 标识转基因生物标识范围公众接受度    
Abstract:

The labeling of genetically modified(GM) products is closely related to the consumers’ right to know and the right to choose. Hence, the labeling policy has been a focus for concern. Since the promulgation of the first GM labeling policy in 1997, more than 70 countries and regions have carried out the labeling management of GM products. Since 2015, due to many factors including the development strategy of the GM industry, the public acceptance, the demand for the trade of agricultural products, and the government political policy, the United States, Korea, Russia, Ukraine and Japan have started to adjust the labeling policy or revise the implementation details. The changes are characterized by mandatory labeling requirements, expanded labeling scope, clearer labeling ways, and more standardized negative labeling (non-GMO labeling) requirements. Through the analysis of the international labeling policies and the recent trends, the suggestions on the management of labeling scope, labeling threshold and negative labeling in China are proposed.

Key words: Labeling    Genetically modified organism(GMO)    Labeling scope    Public acceptance
收稿日期: 2018-05-04 出版日期: 2018-10-12
基金资助: * 国家转基因生物新品种培育重大专项(2012ZX08011003)
通讯作者: 宋贵文     E-mail: songguiwen@agri.gov.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
徐琳杰
刘培磊
李文龙
孙卓婧
宋贵文

引用本文:

徐琳杰,刘培磊,李文龙,孙卓婧,宋贵文. 国际转基因标识制度变动趋势分析及对我国的启示 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(9): 94-98.

Lin-jie XU,Pei lei LIU,Wen-long LI,Zhuo-jing SUN,Gui-wen SONG. Analysis of the Recent Trends of International Labeling Policies for Genetically Modified Products and the Enlightenment to China’s Labeling Management. China Biotechnology, 2018, 38(9): 94-98.

链接本文:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/10.13523/j.cb.20180914        https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/Y2018/V38/I9/94

[1] Hudson B K . 64 countries around the world label GE food. Sound Consumer, 2013,479:12.
[2] 徐琳杰, 刘培磊, 熊鹂 , 等. 国际上主要国家和地区农业转基因产品的标识制度. 生物安全学报, 2014,23(3):301-304.
Xu L J, Liu P L, Xiong L , et al. International labeling policies for genetically modified agricultural products. Journal of Biosafety, 2014,23(3):301-304.
[3] 金芜军, 贾士荣, 彭于发 . 不同国家和地区转基因产品标识管理政策的比较. 农业生物技术学报, 2004,12(1):1-7.
Jin W J, Jia S R, Peng Y F , Comparison of labeling policy of genetically modified products in different countries and territories. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2004,12(1):1-7.
[4] 茆巍, 刘博 . 州立法视野下美国转基因食品标识政策的可能变化与展望. 中国软科学, 2014, ( 8):80-89.
Mao W, Liu B . Potential change in and outlook on American policy concerning GM food labeling from perspective of state legislation. China Soft Science, 2014, ( 8):80-89.
[5] 刘旭霞, 张楠 . 美国国家生物工程食品信息披露标准法案评析. 中国生物工程杂志, 2016,36(11):131-138.
Liu X X, Zhang N . Analysis of American national bioengineered food disclosure standard. China Biotechnology, 2016,36(11):131-138.
[6] 农业部农产品贸易办公室, 农业部农业贸易促进中心. 国际农产品贸易统计年鉴2017.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017: 300-361.
Agricultural Product Trade Office of the Ministry of Agriculture, Agricultural Trade Promotion Center of the Ministry of Agriculture. International agricultural trade statistical yearbook. Beijing: China Agricultural Press, 2017: 300-361.
[7] 徐琳杰, 孙卓婧, 杨雄年 , 等. 科学视角下的转基因技术认知和发展. 中国生物工程杂志, 2016,36(4):30-34.
doi: 10.13523/j.cb.20160405
Xu L J, Sun Z J, Yang X N , et al. Cognition and development of genetic modification from perspective of science. China Biotechnology, 2016,36(4):30-34.
doi: 10.13523/j.cb.20160405
[8] 胡加祥 . 美国转基因食品标识制度的嬗变及对我国的启示. 比较法研究, 2017,5:158-169.
Hu J X . Study on the change of US GM food labeling law and its impact on China. Journal of Comparative Law, 2017,5:158-169.
[1] 刘旭霞,赵宗豪. 美国生物工程食品信息披露制度的新变化及启示 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(1-2): 180-188.
[2] 周天盟,刘旭霞. 论预防原则在欧盟转基因生物监管中的困境与出路 *——基于意大利Fidenato案的分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(6): 95-102.
[3] 刘旭霞, 张楠. 美国国家生物工程食品信息披露标准法案评析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2016, 36(11): 131-138.
[4] 沈平, 李昂, 章秋艳, 李文龙, 宋贵文. 农业生物技术专栏转基因产品标准物质概述[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2015, 35(4): 107-111.
[5] 闫峰. 美国与欧盟的转基因食品贸易争端及我国的发展对策[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2004, 24(11): 93-95.