非核糖体肽合成酶催化模块的重构与多肽合成*

翁杨菁, 吴杰群

中国生物工程杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2-3) : 141-151.

PDF(3299 KB)
PDF(3299 KB)
中国生物工程杂志 ›› 2023, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (2-3) : 141-151. DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.2210005
综述

非核糖体肽合成酶催化模块的重构与多肽合成*

作者信息 +

Reconstitution of Non-ribosomal Peptide Synthetases Catalytic Module and Peptide Synthesis

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

天然次级代谢产物是重要的药物来源,非核糖体肽(non-ribosomal peptide,NRP)是自然界中广泛存在的次级代谢产物,其多样的化学结构使其具有多种生物活性,如抗炎、抗肿瘤、抗病毒等。基于非核糖体多肽合成酶(nonribosomal peptide synthetases,NRPS)模块化线性合成多肽的原理对其催化模块进行改造、重组,定向设计多肽的生物合成途径以获得目的多肽已成为一个研究热点。然而杂合NRPS存在催化模块无法加载目标氨基酸或多肽合成效率显著降低等诸多问题,限制了其应用。近年来,NRPS腺苷酰化域(adenylation domain,A域)及缩合结构域(condensation domain,C域)的底物选择性、NRPS亚基间对接域(docking domain,DD)和模块间连接区(linker)的研究已取得较大突破。从C域对底物的选择性及以不同融合边界进行催化单元替换两方面进行综述,介绍NRPS催化模块重构的研究进展,并概述了各替换方案的优点与局限性。

Abstract

Based on the principle of modular linear synthesis of peptides by non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS), it has become a research hotspot to engineer and recombine its catalytic module and design the biosynthetic pathway of peptides to obtain the target peptides. However, heterozygous NRPS has many problems. For example, the catalytic module cannot load the target amino acids or the synthesis efficiency of peptides is significantly reduced, which limits its application. In recent years, great breakthroughs have been made in the research of substrate selectivity of NRPS adenylation domain (A domain) and condensation domain (C domain), docking domain (DD) between NRPS subunits and linker between modules. This review introduces the research progress of NRPS catalytic module reconsitution from the two aspects of substrate selectivity in C domain and catalytic unit substitution with different fusion boundaries, and summarizes the advantages and limitations of each substitution scheme.

关键词

非核糖体肽合成酶 / 结构域杂合 / 腺苷酰化域 / 缩合结构域

Key words

Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) / Domain hybrid / Adenylation domain / Condensation domain

引用本文

导出引用
翁杨菁, 吴杰群. 非核糖体肽合成酶催化模块的重构与多肽合成*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2023, 43(2-3): 141-151 https://doi.org/10.13523/j.cb.2210005
Yang-Jing WENG, Jie-Qun WU. Reconstitution of Non-ribosomal Peptide Synthetases Catalytic Module and Peptide Synthesis[J]. China Biotechnology, 2023, 43(2-3): 141-151 https://doi.org/10.13523/j.cb.2210005
中图分类号: Q936   
在过去的几十年里,次级代谢产物是重要的药物来源[1-2]。由非核糖体肽合成酶催化合成的非核糖体肽家族是次级代谢产物中的一类重要化合物,因其丰富多样的化学结构和用途成为可供挖掘的药库,如具有抗菌活性的达托霉素、多黏菌素、万古霉素,具有抗炎和免疫抑制作用的环孢霉素A,具有抗肿瘤活性的博来霉素[3-5](图1)。
图1 几种常见非核糖体肽药物的化学结构

Fig.1 Chemical structures of several common non ribosomal peptide drugs

Full size|PPT slide

非核糖体肽生物合成机制有别于传统的依赖核糖体合成的蛋白质或多肽。其主要是通过一个巨大的非核糖体肽合成酶将氨基酸线性组装起来[6-7]。非核糖体肽合成酶是由多个模块组成的复合酶酶系,每个模块负责一轮肽键的延伸,并且模块与氨基酸的组装顺序存在一一对应关系。其中模块化催化单元最基本的功能域包括缩合域、腺苷酰化域、肽基载体蛋白结构域(thiolation domain, T域)[5,8 -9]。非核糖体肽合成酶线性催化合成多肽的基本过程如下:(1) A域从氨基酸底物池中特异性识别激活氨基酸并将氨基酸腺苷酰化形成氨酰-AMP[10],随后氨酰-AMP共价结合到经磷酸泛酰巯基乙胺基转移酶[11-12](phosphopantetheine transferase, PPTase)活化的T域上,形成氨酰硫脂;(2) T域将氨酰硫脂转移到C域,在C域该氨酰硫脂的游离氨基亲核进攻上一个中间体的羰基[13],使其硫酯键断裂而形成肽键,由此完成一轮底物缩合;(3)第二步形成的肽链中间体转移至同一模块的T域,作为下一模块的供体肽链;(4)在硫酯酶结构域(thioesterase domain,TE域)的水解或环化作用下多肽释放(图2)。此外,一些模块中还含有差向异构域、氧化域、甲基化域等,增加了非核糖体肽的结构多样性[14]。除20种蛋白质源氨基酸外,非核糖体肽结构中还可掺入D-氨基酸、N-甲基化氨基酸、β-氨基酸、α-羟基酸、羧酸、胺等[5-7]
图2 非核糖体肽合成的普遍机制

Fig.2 General principles of nonribosomal peptide synthesis

Domain arrangements of bacterial NRPS and synthesis mechanisms of non-ribosomal peptides: firstly, the A domain adenylates the substrate to form an aminoacyl-AMP, which is subsequently bound to the immediately downstream holo-T domain; secondly, the C domain condenses the upstream donor substrate onto the downstream acceptor substrate; thirdly, the peptide intermediate formed in the second step is transferred to the T-domain of the same module; fourthly, peptide chain release upon hydrolysis or cyclization of the TE domain

Full size|PPT slide

基于NRPS线性合成机制和模块化原理,人们一直尝试采用组合生物合成的方法对编码非核糖体肽合成酶的催化单元进行操作[15],以亚基交换[16]或模块/结构域交换[17]/增加[18]/减少[19]等方式改变原有非核糖体肽的生物合成途径,获得新的非核糖体肽类化合物或其衍生物。但是前期的研究数据表明随机寻找NRPS结构域边界间的蛋白质同源区域进行模块交换的成功率并不高:一方面,按一般规律进行模块交换和杂合,往往导致目标产物产量的急剧下降;另一方面,合适的交换边界仅在蛋白质序列同源性较高的NRPS之间较易寻找,具有一定局限性[17]。近年来,NRPS催化模块重构研究取得了较大的突破,我们在下文中对相关进展进行了重点论述。

1 模块替换

对NRPS进行改造主要有两个难点:其一是酶对底物变化的容忍度;其二是在功能域之间重组拼装过程中,融合边界对蛋白质整体结构产生了影响从而降低了酶活。因此要使杂合NRPS可识别加载底物合成目的多肽及提高杂合NRPS的催化效率,关键在于提高杂合模块对底物的选择性以及将嵌入蛋白对整体蛋白质空间结构的影响减至最小。我们认为至少需要考虑三方面的问题:一是杂合模块来源的选择。对应同一氨基酸残基融合不同NRPS来源的功能模块催化效率是否有差异。二是杂合边界的选择。可以根据蛋白质序列的保守性判断每一个结构域的边界,通过原始模块与替换模块间蛋白质序列的比对在结构域连接区域寻找同源性较高的序列作为边界节点进行替换。三是考虑缩合域的底物特异性。虽然腺苷酰化A域是底物氨基酸选择的第一道门槛,但是催化模块中的缩合结构域C域对底物也有选择特异性。往往在对NRPS的A结构进行替换后,腺苷酰基化的氨基酸不能在C域进行缩合反应而使肽链无法延伸,且C域对其相邻下游A域的底物选择性产生影响。

1.1 腺苷酰化域替换

在非核糖体肽装配过程中,首先由腺苷酰化域从可利用的氨基酸底物池中选择相对应的特异氨基酸合成相应的氨酰-AMP[9]。许多研究表明,NRPS每一催化模块延伸氨基酸的特异性主要取决于A域和C域,其中A域是底物氨基酸选择的第一道门槛。A域腺苷酰化氨基酸底物的特异性导致催化模块延伸氨基酸残基的差异。因此,最早的模块替换集中在A域。Stachelhaus等[20]于1995年在枯草芽孢杆菌(Bacillus subtilis)中用异源A域替换脂肽抗生素Surfactin合成酶SrfA-C中Leu7特异性A域(SrfA-A7),成功得到了Phe7、Orn7、Cys7、Val7取代的系列Surfactin类似物 (图3a)。随后,该团队继续用异源AT域替换合成酶SrfA-A中Leu2特异性A域(SrfA-A2),得到了Orn2取代的Surfactin类似物[21]。虽然上述A域及AT域替换均得到了目的产物,但该实验中Surfactin类似物的产量均明显下降。此外,并不是所有的A域替换均能获得预期产物。例如,Ackerley和Lamont[22]分别采用异源的腺苷酰化L-Thr、Cys、Val和Ser的A域替换铜绿假单胞菌(Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1)非核糖体肽合成酶第4个亚基PvdD模块一的A域(L-Thr),仅腺苷酰化L-Thr的A域替换有少量产物pyoverdine产生,其余杂合的NRPS均无功能 (图3b)。此实验中非Thr特异性腺苷酰化域替换后无多肽产物合成可能是由于C域的底物特异性。1999年Belshaw等[23]在对C域研究后提出假想,C域的C端部分为受体位点,结合氨酰-S-PCP;N端部分为供体位点,结合上游的肽基-S-PCP,受体位点对受体底物氨酰-S-PCP有强选择性,供体位点对供体底物侧链氨基酸仅有弱选择性。因此杂合A域识别的Cys、Val和Ser无法进入上游C域结构,进而无法与上游肽链缩合,导致肽链延伸中断[22]。然而Belshaw等研究的不足之处在于仅以一个氨基酸即氨酰-S-PCP作供体底物,无法证明C域供体位点对多肽的选择性,当供体底物为肽-S-PCP时,供体位点选择性并非如此[24]
图3 结构域交换策略

Fig.3 Strategies for domain substitution

(a) A and A-T domain substitution in surfactin NRPS (b) A,C-A and T-C-A domain substitution in the PvdD subunit of pyoverdine NRPS (c) FSD domain substitution

Full size|PPT slide

如前述,A域从氨基酸底物池中选择相对应的特异氨基酸合成相应的氨酰-AMP。有报道显示,A结构域中有10个非连续编码的关键氨基酸残基决定了其底物识别的特异性[25]。因此,除完整的A域替换外,近年来有研究尝试替换A域内包含关键活性氨基酸残基的高度保守的一个黄素氧还蛋白样亚域(flavodoxin-like sub domain,FSD)[26-27]。交换FSD能最小地破坏A域的整体结构,维持和其它结构域间的关键相互作用,使杂合的NRPS保持原有催化效率[26]。例如,Kries等[27]用9个不同底物特异性的FSD替换对苯丙氨酸特异性识别的gramicidin S合成酶起始模块GrsA的FSD。其中,替换缬氨酸特异性FSD的GrsA腺苷酰化活性强。并且在添加脯氨酸特异性GrsB1模块后,GrsA- GrsB1作为一个Val-Pro二酮哌嗪合成酶发挥作用,合成了D-Val-L-Pro二酮哌嗪 (图3c)。Thong等[28]用CRISPR-Cas9基因编辑技术,替换enduracidin合成酶的FSD,得到了一系列新的脂肽,有的产量接近野生型菌株。

1.2 模块整体替换

在NRPS中采用模块整体替换能够保证催化单元模块结构和功能的完整性。例如,用脂肽lichenysin生物合成基因簇中的Gln识别模块CAT交换surfactin合成基因簇中的Glu模块,得到了高产、高活性的新型脂肽[29](图4a)。用达托霉素NRPS中模块11CASerT交换模块8 CAAlaT,得到8号位D-Ser取代的达托霉素类似物;用模块8 CAAlaT替换模块11 CASerT,得到11号位D-Ala取代的达托霉素类似物[17]。这两种新化合物均对金黄色葡萄球菌具有药理活性,但产量仅为野生型菌株的15%和45%左右。有研究以T-C域间的LGG(H/D)S(I/L)保守序列为融合位点,将一个钙离子依赖的脂肽抗生素(calcium dependent antibiotic,CDA)合成酶模块13 CATrpT和A54145 NRPS模块13 CAIleT替换达托霉素NRPS模块13CAKynT,分别获得了13位Trp和Ile取代的达托霉素类似物,且对杂合NRPS催化效率影响较小,新化合物产量最高接近原产量的67%[30]
图4 结构域交换策略

Fig.4 Strategies for domain substitution

(a) Whole module substitution (b) A-T-C domain substitution in the ambactin NRPS (c) CAsub-A-T-CDsub as a catalyst unit for substitution

Full size|PPT slide

1.3 CA域替换

在1.1所述异源A域替换PvdD模块一L-Thr A域的同时, Ackerley和Lamont[22]用异源CA域(包括L-苏氨酸特异的CA域)替换PvdD模块一CA域,但意外的是所有杂合酶均无活性。CA域交换失败的原因有:(1)杂合的异源CA域无法与PvdD模块一的天然T域有效互作,导致杂合酶无活性;(2)现有理论显示,亚基间的对接域可指导非核糖体肽合成酶正确的线性排列,并介导亚基间的互作,该实验中PvdD模块一的CA域替换后无法与上游亚基PvdJ正确对接[31-33](图3b)。
Tanovic等[34]在对枯草芽孢杆菌中的脂肽抗生素合成酶最末端模块SrfA-C的结构研究后发现,其缩合域(C域)和腺苷酰化域(A域)之间有一段含32个氨基酸的连接区,在SrfA-C晶体结构中,该连接区与C域、A域均紧密相连。因此,人们认为在模块替换时需保持CA域结构完整,C域与A域应作为不可分割的整体才能避免破坏杂合酶的结构和活性。基于此现象,Calcott等[35]继续用异源CA域替换PvdD亚基第二个模块CA域。与该团队早期替换PvdD亚基第一个模块CA域不同,替换PvdD亚基第二个模块CA域可避免破坏PvdD与上游亚基PvdJ间的相互作用(图3b)。结果显示,有两个杂合NRPS具有较好的催化活性,并获得了两种Thr11和Lys11取代的pyoverdine类似物,产量分别是野生型的83% 和76%,其余6个杂合酶均无活性[35]

2 融合边界

在初期研究中,从保证模块功能完整性的角度考虑,研究者通常以A结构域或一个完整的CAT(E)模块单元对NRPS进行替换等改造[27-28,36]。例如,以T-C域间连接区为融合边界替换达托霉素非核糖体肽合成酶的完整CAT模块[30]。然而完整CAT(E)模块交换存在产量急剧下降的问题,且要求蛋白质序列具有高同源性,有一定的局限性。理解结构域间的连接区在非核糖体肽合成酶催化底物活化、加载、缩合过程中的作用,对于通过模块替换获取较好催化活性的杂合NRPS有重要作用。

2.1 以A-T域间连接区为融合边界

Miller等[37]通过生物信息学分析了不同NRPS的A-T域间连接区后,在A-T域的连接区发现了一段保守的LPxP序列,该LPxP序列与A域C端的亚域相互作用以稳定A10基序中的保守赖氨酸;此外,该基序与A域C端的亚域相互作用可能会协调PCP域的运动与A域的构象变化。将LPxP序列中的Pro961突变后导致产物合成速率下降近一半[37]。同时有研究将发光杆菌(Photorhabdus luminescens)中单模块靛蓝合成酶IndC的T域用来自链霉菌的BpsA酶的T域替换后,破坏了靛蓝合成;令人惊奇的是,将BpsA酶的T域与A-T域间的连接区一起交换时恢复了靛蓝合成[38]。上述实验表明选择并保留合适的结构域间连接区对某些模块替换获得有活性的杂合NRPS至关重要。Calcott等[39]曾用CA域替换PvdD第二个模块(1.3),然而仅少数杂合NRPS具有较好催化活性,大多数杂合NRPS无功能[35]。随后,该团队以A-T间连接区为融合边界替换合成酶PvdD中T-C-AThr11催化单元(图3b)。虽然成功获得了两种Ser11和fhOrn11取代的pyoverdine衍生物,但是这两个衍生物的产量都较低。

2.2 以C-A间保守序列为融合边界替换A-T-C域

近年来德国法兰克福大学Bode团队发现CA结构域之间的连接区含一段保守序列LLLxxWNxT。利用此边界节点,在NRPS两个模块(CAT-CAT)之间选择AT-C区域为替换单元(exchange unit,XU)进行模块替换能获得活性较高的杂合NRPS蛋白,某些替换组合非核糖体肽的产量甚至比野生型提高了48%[40](图4b)。以A-T-C结构域作为交换单元进行模块替换和组合虽然取得了重大突破,而且可以进行多模块同时替换和组装,但这个方法局限性明显:首先,CA结构域之间的保守序列LLLxxWNxT在很多NRPS蛋白序列中并不存在。其次,现有理论显示C域对进入该结构域的氨酰-S-PCP受体具有很高的底物选择性,当杂合的A域识别的氨基酸与上游的C域不匹配时,肽链无法延伸导致无目标产物产生。因此,在对NRPS进行改造时,不仅需要考虑杂合NRPS的催化效率,还需要考虑C域对底物的选择性,避免杂合的A域识别的氨基酸与上游C域不匹配时肽链无法延伸导致无目标产物产生。

2.3 替换CAsub-A-T-CDsub催化单元

通过对C域的蛋白质结构分析,研究人员发现C域的N端是提供肽链的供体域(CDsub),C端是受体域(CAsub),它们分别接受肽基-S-PCP和氨酰-S-PCP。其中受体域(CAsub)对氨酰-S-PCP有特异识别作用[41]。例如,Kaniusaite等[42-44]对糖肽类抗生素(glycopeptide antibiotics,GPAs)NRPS的改造实验也表明,C域对受体底物氨酰-S-PCP有强选择性。也有研究显示,C域不仅对受体底物氨酰-S-PCP有选择性,对供体底物肽基-S-PCP的大小和组成也有选择性[24,45 -47]。对C域的结构解析也发现其具有立体和侧链选择性[48]。基于此理论Bozhüyük等[49]于2019年进一步开发了第二代的替换方案:用CAsub-A-T-CDsub作为基本的替换单元(exchange unit condensation domain,XUC)进行整体替换。该方案避免了杂合A域和C域之间氨基酸底物识别不匹配的问题,明显具有更广的适用范围,且该催化单元避免了破坏最主要的结构域-结构域相互作用[50],有的多肽产量比野生型提高了63.4%[49](图4c)。利用该方法可以构建多种随机组合的类似天然的非核糖体肽库。然而CAsub-A-T-CDsub作为交换单元的局限性在于:来源于同属的模块间易融合,而来源于不同属的模块间缺乏兼容性;TE结构域对氨基酸位置、肽链长度或环肽大小的特异性限制了全新的非天然、非核糖体肽以及环肽、缩肽形成[51]

2.4 利用合成拉链在C-A边界处高效杂合催化模块

尽管以CAsub-A-T-CDsub为替换单元可以构建结构多样的非核糖体肽库,但是NRPS的巨型结构和保守的重复序列使得对其进行基因操作比较复杂和困难;此外,对功能域结构了解不足有时会导致人们在对NRPS进行催化单元替换重组时破坏了域间的对接域,也限制了替换对接域这一方案[40,52 -53]。2021年,Reinke等[54]和Thompson等[55]用一对人工合成的短肽作为“拉链”(synthetic zippers,ZPs)替代NRPS结构域间的对接域,介导杂合催化模块间的相互作用。一对拉链以非共价作用相互结合,并以C-A间的保守序列LLLxxW]-[NxT作为插入位点,由此介导两个亚基或催化模块间的结合。Bozhueyuek等[56]用此方法合成了大量多肽,有的组合非核糖体肽的产量甚至比普通融合方式提高了8倍 (图5b)。
图5 结构域交换策略

Fig.5 Strategies for domain substitution

(a) A domain substitution with redefined C-A linker (b) Modular fusion between C-A linker without and with synthetic zippers

Full size|PPT slide

此方法避免了克隆和非核糖体肽合成酶大小的限制,可随机组合任意的NRPS模块,为快速实现新高通量生物组合方法、开发多肽类药物铺平了道路。

3 C域与A域的相互作用

3.1 C域改变A域的活性和选择性

从上述经典的NRPS生物合成理论可知,A域特异性识别氨基酸底物进行腺苷酰基化,C域在氨基酸缩合过程对受体氨酰-S-PCP的种类进一步校对验证(proofreading),A域和C域在底物选择过程中各自独立发挥作用,共同确保所合成非核糖体肽结构专一。但近年的研究报道显示C域对其相邻下游A域的底物选择性产生影响。Mayer等[57]将A域进行单独表达后,它可以腺苷酰基化多种氨基酸底物,但和C域联合表达后,A域只对精氨酸具有腺苷酰基化活性;单独表达A域时对天然底物酪氨酸和色氨酸均无活性,与C域联合表达后对这两种氨基酸具有腺苷酰基化活性。表明C域与A域的相互作用改变了A域的底物特异性,且某些A域只有在C域存在的条件下才具有活性。
此外,很多非脂肽类NRPS的起始模块并不含有C域,起始模块的A域腺苷酰基化氨基酸后通过T域直接转移到下一模块的C域进行氨基酸缩合。但是若采用NRPS延伸模块A域直接替代起始单元A域,目前尚未见肽链延伸成功的报道。近期Bozhüyük等[49]将C域(或C域C端的受体域CAsub)和延伸模块A域共表达时,成功地将延伸单元的A域转变为起始单元A域,产生了目标非核糖体肽化合物。
有研究在交换AT域时把C域C端作为杂合位点,杂合蛋白具有较高产量[58]。与最早的AT域替换通常导致产量下降[21,59 -60]相反,该实验中AT域的成功交换表明C-A间的相互作用界面对A域发挥活性功能很重要,当杂合的异源A域或AT域或AT-C域不包含此相互作用界面时,异源A域无法与上游C域正确互作,因此A域活性丧失,杂合NRPS无法发挥功能。上述实验表明在NRPS中每一组催化模块的C域和A域并非各自独立发挥作用完成一轮氨基酸延伸,C域与A域发生交互作用完善了A域腺苷酰基化的功能。

3.2 关于C域底物选择性的争议

近20年来,研究者们普遍认为A域和C域在底物选择和“校正”中都起着关键作用,这一假说极大地复杂了NRPS的理性化组合生物合成。通过生物信息学分析A域的蛋白质序列,发现其对氨基酸底物的选择有很大保守性,甚至可以通过A域蛋白质序列大致预测其氨基酸底物的种类。但是C域的蛋白质序列对应相同氨酰-S-PCP底物无特殊规律或保守性。在天蓝色链霉菌(Streptomyces coelicolor)中一个钙离子依赖的脂肽抗生素合成酶的第一个C域(CDA-C1)负责催化供体2,3-epoxyhexanoyl ACP与丝氨酸-S-PCP的缩合。但是加拿大麦吉尔大学Martin Schmeing课题组通过喂养其他受体底物(丙氨酸-,亮氨酸-,甲硫氨酸-S-PCP)时发现,这些受体底物也可以与供体2,3-epoxyhexanoyl ACP进行缩合[61]。此外,Schoppet等[62] 的最新研究结果也表明C域对底物具有宽泛的选择性及立体结构的容忍性。Calcott等[63]的研究也对C域的受体底物特异性这一理论提出了质疑和反驳。Ackerley等[22]和Calcott等[35]通过选择有效的重组边界,在pyoverdine NRPS中交换A域的成功率很高,pyoverdine类似物的产量优于该团队先前以CA作交换单元时的产量(图5a)。
据此,结合生物信息学分析,研究者认为C结构域受体底物的特异性不是阻碍对NRPS工程化改造的因素。Calcott等[63]将PheATE- ProCAT模型中ProCAT模块A域以上述重组边界交换为L-Leu的A域后,成功合成了D-Phe- L-Leu,反驳了C域受体底物特异性这一假说,证明在交换NRPS催化模块时,通过选择有效的重组边界即可交换A域,实现对非核糖体肽生物合成途径改造,获取新的非核糖体肽。Calcott的实验对普遍公认的C域受体底物特异性这一理论提出了巨大挑战。然而其二肽合成中仅以识别L-Leu的A域交换ProCAT,因此存在偶然性,缺少对其他氨基酸特异的A域交换结果。

4 总结与展望

设计非核糖体肽的生物合成途径,以产生具有新结构或更好药理活性的新型化合物,一直是天然产物合成生物学的目标。基于非核糖体肽合成酶的线性催化机制,理论上定向重组催化模块可以获得任意氨基酸序列组合的多肽。然而杂合NRPS的催化效率限制了其可行性和实用性。随着对NRPS各功能域的结构研究日益深入,选择合适的催化单元和理想的重组边界使杂合NRPS可识别加载目的底物和提高其催化效率成为可能。因此,合理设计构建策略,允许催化单元任意重组,从而高效合成自然界尚未存在的化合物,对增加非核糖体肽家族化合物多样性、开发新药具有重大意义。

参考文献

[1]
Clardy J, Fischbach M A, Walsh C T. New antibiotics from bacterial natural products. Nature Biotechnology, 2006, 24(12): 1541-1550.
For the past five decades, the need for new antibiotics has been met largely by semisynthetic tailoring of natural product scaffolds discovered in the middle of the 20(th) century. More recently, however, advances in technology have sparked a resurgence in the discovery of natural product antibiotics from bacterial sources. In particular, efforts have refocused on finding new antibiotics from old sources (for example, streptomycetes) and new sources (for example, other actinomycetes, cyanobacteria and uncultured bacteria). This has resulted in several newly discovered antibiotics with unique scaffolds and/or novel mechanisms of action, with the potential to form a basis for new antibiotic classes addressing bacterial targets that are currently underexploited.
[2]
von Nussbaum F, Brands M, Hinzen B, et al. Antibacterial natural products in medicinal chemistry: exodus or revival? Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English), 2006, 45(31): 5072-5129.
[3]
Felnagle E A, Jackson E E, Chan Y A, et al. Nonribosomal peptide synthetases involved in the production of medically relevant natural products. Molecular Pharmaceutics, 2008, 5(2): 191-211.
Natural products biosynthesized wholly or in part by nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are some of the most important drugs currently used clinically for the treatment of a variety of diseases. Since the initial research into NRPSs in the early 1960s, we have gained considerable insights into the mechanism by which these enzymes assemble these natural products. This review will present a brief history of how the basic mechanistic steps of NRPSs were initially deciphered and how this information has led us to understand how nature modified these systems to generate the enormous structural diversity seen in nonribosomal peptides. This review will also briefly discuss how drug development and discovery are being influenced by what we have learned from nature about nonribosomal peptide biosynthesis.
[4]
Calcott M J, Ackerley D F. Genetic manipulation of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases to generate novel bioactive peptide products. Biotechnology Letters, 2014, 36(12): 2407-2416.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) are large modular enzymes that govern the synthesis of numerous biotechnologically relevant products. Their mode of action is frequently compared to an assembly line, in which each module acts in a semi-autonomous but coordinated manner to add a specific monomer to a growing peptide chain, unfettered by ribosomal constraints. The modular nature of these systems offers tantalising prospects for synthetic biology, wherein the assembly line is re-engineered at a genetic level to generate a specific or combinatorial modified product. However, despite some success stories, a "one size fits all" approach to NRPS synthetic biology remains elusive. This review examines both rational and random mutagenesis strategies that have been employed to modify NRPS function, in an attempt to highlight key points that should be considered when seeking to re-engineer an NRPS biosynthetic template.
[5]
Sieber S A, Marahiel M A. Molecular mechanisms underlying nonribosomal peptide synthesis: approaches to new antibiotics. Chemical Reviews, 2005, 105(2): 715-738.
[6]
Grünewald J, Marahiel M A. Chemoenzymatic and template-directed synthesis of bioactive macrocyclic peptides. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews: MMBR, 2006, 70(1): 121-146.
[7]
Caboche S, Leclère V, Pupin M, et al. Diversity of monomers in nonribosomal peptides: towards the prediction of origin and biological activity. Journal of Bacteriology, 2010, 192(19): 5143-5150.
Nonribosomal peptides (NRPs) are molecules produced by microorganisms that have a broad spectrum of biological activities and pharmaceutical applications (e.g., antibiotic, immunomodulating, and antitumor activities). One particularity of the NRPs is the biodiversity of their monomers, extending far beyond the 20 proteogenic amino acid residues. Norine, a comprehensive database of NRPs, allowed us to review for the first time the main characteristics of the NRPs and especially their monomer biodiversity. Our analysis highlighted a significant similarity relationship between NRPs synthesized by bacteria and those isolated from metazoa, especially from sponges, supporting the hypothesis that some NRPs isolated from sponges are actually synthesized by symbiotic bacteria rather than by the sponges themselves. A comparison of peptide monomeric compositions as a function of biological activity showed that some monomers are specific to a class of activities. An analysis of the monomer compositions of peptide products predicted from genomic information (metagenomics and high-throughput genome sequencing) or of new peptides detected by mass spectrometry analysis applied to a culture supernatant can provide indications of the origin of a peptide and/or its biological activity.
[8]
Mootz H D, Schwarzer D, Marahiel M A. Ways of assembling complex natural products on modular nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chembiochem: A European Journal of Chemical Biology, 2002, 3(6): 490-504.
[9]
Fischbach M A, Walsh C T. Assembly-line enzymology for polyketide and nonribosomal peptide antibiotics: Logic machinery, and mechanisms. Chemical Reviews, 2006, 106(8): 3468-3496.
[10]
Gulick A M. Conformational dynamics in the Acyl-CoA synthetases, adenylation domains of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, and firefly luciferase. ACS Chemical Biology, 2009, 4(10): 811-827.
The ANL superfamily of adenylating enzymes contains acyl- and aryl-CoA synthetases, firefly luciferase, and the adenylation domains of the modular non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs). Members of this family catalyze two partial reactions: the initial adenylation of a carboxylate to form an acyl-AMP intermediate, followed by a second partial reaction, most commonly the formation of a thioester. Recent biochemical and structural evidence has been presented that supports the use by this enzyme family of a remarkable catalytic strategy for the two catalytic steps. The enzymes use a 140 degrees domain rotation to present opposing faces of the dynamic C-terminal domain to the active site for the different partial reactions. Support for this domain alternation strategy is presented along with an explanation of the advantage of this catalytic strategy for the reaction catalyzed by the ANL enzymes. Finally, the ramifications of this domain rotation in the catalytic cycle of the modular NRPS enzymes are discussed.
[11]
Beld J, Sonnenschein E C, Vickery C R, et al. The phosphopantetheinyl transferases: catalysis of a post-translational modification crucial for life. Natural Product Reports, 2014, 31(1): 61-108.
Covering: up to 2013. Although holo-acyl carrier protein synthase, AcpS, a phosphopantetheinyl transferase (PPTase), was characterized in the 1960s, it was not until the publication of the landmark paper by Lambalot et al. in 1996 that PPTases garnered wide-spread attention being classified as a distinct enzyme superfamily. In the past two decades an increasing number of papers have been published on PPTases ranging from identification, characterization, structure determination, mutagenesis, inhibition, and engineering in synthetic biology. In this review, we comprehensively discuss all current knowledge on this class of enzymes that post-translationally install a 4'-phosphopantetheine arm on various carrier proteins.
[12]
Lambalot R H, Gehring A M, Flugel R S, et al. A new enzyme superfamily: the phosphopantetheinyl transferases. Chemistry & Biology, 1996, 3(11): 923-936.
[13]
Brown A S, Calcott M J, Owen J G, et al. Structural, functional and evolutionary perspectives on effective re-engineering of non-ribosomal peptide synthetase assembly lines. Natural Product Reports, 2018, 35(11): 1210-1228.
Covering: up to May 2018 Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are mega-enzymes that form modular templates to assemble specific peptide products, independent of the ribosome. The autonomous nature of the modules in the template offers prospects for re-engineering NRPS enzymes to generate modified peptide products. Although this has clearly been a primary mechanism of natural product diversification throughout evolution, equivalent strategies have proven challenging to implement in the laboratory. In this review we examine key examples of successful and less-successful re-engineering of NRPS templates to generate novel peptides, with the aim of extracting practical guidelines to inform future efforts. We emphasise the importance of maintaining effective protein-protein interactions in recombinant NRPS templates, and identify strengths and limitations of diverse strategies for achieving different engineering outcomes.
[14]
McErlean M, Overbay J, Van Lanen S. Refining and expanding nonribosomal peptide synthetase function and mechanism. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2019, 46(3): 493-513.
[15]
Baltz R H. Combinatorial biosynthesis of cyclic lipopeptide antibiotics: a model for synthetic biology to accelerate the evolution of secondary metabolite biosynthetic pathways. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2014, 3(10): 748-758.
Nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are giant multi-enzymes that carry out sequencial assembly line couplings of amino acids to generate linear or cyclic peptides. NRPSs are composed of repeating enzyme domains with modular organization to activate and couple specific amino acids in a particular order. From a synthetic biology perspective, they can be considered as peptide assembly machines composed of devices to couple fatty acids to l-amino acids, l-amino acids to l-amino acids, and d-amino acids to l-amino acids. The coupling devices are composed of specific parts that contain two or more enzyme domains that can be exchanged combinatorially to generate novel peptide assembly machines to produce novel peptides. The potent lipopeptide antibiotics daptomycin and A54145E have identical cyclic depsipeptide ring structures and stereochemistry but have divergent amino acid sequences. As their biosynthetic gene clusters are derived from an ancient ancestral lipopetide pathway, these lipopeptides provided an attractive model to develop combinatorial biosynthesis to generate antibiotics superior to daptomycin. These studies on combinatorial biosynthesis have helped generate guidelines for the successful assembly of NRPS parts and devices that can be used to generate novel lipopeptide structures and have established a basis for future synthetic biology studies to further develop combinatorial biosynthesis as a robust approach to natural product drug discovery.
[16]
Miao V, Gal M F C L, Nguyen K, et al. Genetic engineering in Streptomyces roseosporus to produce hybrid lipopeptide antibiotics. Chemistry & Biology, 2006, 13(3): 269-276.
[17]
Nguyen K T, Ritz D, Gu J Q, et al. Combinatorial biosynthesis of novel antibiotics related to daptomycin. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2006, 103(46): 17462-17467.
[18]
Mootz H D, Kessler N, Linne U, et al. Decreasing the ring size of a cyclic nonribosomal peptide antibiotic by in-frame module deletion in the biosynthetic genes. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2002, 124(37): 10980-10981.
Many natural products of therapeutical and biotechnological importance are nonribosomally synthesized peptides. Structural hallmarks of this class of compounds are the occurrence of unusual amino acids, mostly cyclic peptide backbones, and numerous further modifications such as acylation, heterocyclic ring formation, and glycosylation. Because of their structural complexity, chemical synthesis is usually an unattractive route to these molecules. In contrast, genetic engineering of the biosynthesis genes emerges as a potentially powerful approach to the combinatorial biosynthesis of useful analogues of the lead compounds. Nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) carry out a sequential multistep assembly and modification of the peptides in a thiotemplate process described by the multiple carrier model. The modular architecture of NRPSs suggests straightforward methods for the reprogramming of these enzymes by exchange of catalytic subunits. However, many of the reported engineering attempts faced low product yields or even inactive hybrid enzymes. Using a new approach to obtain hybrid NRPSs, we show here that the deletion of an entire module in an NRPS assembly line caused the secretion of the predicted peptide antibiotic variant with a decreased ring size. Furthermore, a module exchange resulted in a significantly higher product yield than that observed in previous studies.
[19]
Butz D, Schmiederer T, Hadatsch B, et al. Module extension of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase of the glycopeptide antibiotic balhimycin produced by Amycolatopsis balhimycina. ChemBioChem: A European Journal of Chemical Biology, 2008, 9(8): 1195-1200.
[20]
Stachelhaus T, Schneider A, Marahiel M A. Rational design of peptide antibiotics by targeted replacement of bacterial and fungal domains. Science, 1995, 269(5220): 69-72.
Peptide synthetases involved in the nonribosomal synthesis of peptide secondary metabolites possess a highly conserved domain structure. The arrangement of these domains within the multifunctional enzymes determines the number and order of the amino acid constituents of the peptide product. A general approach has been developed for targeted substitution of amino acid-activating domains within the srfA operon, which encodes the protein templates for the synthesis of the lipopeptide antibiotic surfactin in Bacillus subtilis. Exchange of domain-coding regions of bacterial and fungal origin led to the construction of hybrid genes that encoded peptide synthetases with altered amino acid specificities and the production of peptides with modified amino acid sequences.
[21]
Schneider A, Stachelhaus T, Marahiel M A. Targeted alteration of the substrate specificity of peptide synthetases by rational module swapping. Molecular and General Genetics MGG, 1998, 257(3): 308-318.
[22]
Ackerley D F, Lamont I L. Characterization and genetic manipulation of peptide synthetases in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1 in order to generate novel pyoverdines. Chemistry & Biology, 2004, 11(7): 971-980.
[23]
Belshaw P J, Walsh C T, Stachelhaus T. Aminoacyl-CoAs as probes of condensation domain selectivity in nonribosomal peptide synthesis. Science, 1999, 284(5413): 486-489.
In nonribosomal biosynthesis of peptide antibiotics by multimodular synthetases, amino acid monomers are activated by the adenylation domains of the synthetase and loaded onto the adjacent carrier protein domains as thioesters, then the formation of peptide bonds and translocation of the growing chain are effected by the synthetase's condensation domains. Whether the condensation domains have any editing function has been unknown. Synthesis of aminoacyl-coenzyme A (CoA) molecules and direct enzymatic transfer of aminoacyl-phosphopantetheine to the carrier domains allow the adenylation domain editing function to be bypassed. This method was used to demonstrate that the first condensation domain of tyrocidine synthetase shows low selectivity at the donor residue (D-phenylalanine) and higher selectivity at the acceptor residue (L-proline) in the formation of the chain-initiating D-Phe-L-Pro dipeptidyl-enzyme intermediate.
[24]
Linne U, Marahiel M A. Control of directionality in nonribosomal peptide synthesis: role of the condensation domain in preventing misinitiation and timing of epimerization. Biochemistry, 2000, 39(34): 10439-10447.
Product assembly by nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) is initiated by starter modules that comprise an adenylation (A) and a peptidyl carrier protein (PCP) domain. Elongation modules of NRPS have in addition a condensation (C) domain that is located upstream of the A domain. They cannot initiate peptide bond formation. To understand the role of domain arrangements and the influence of the domains present upstream of the A domains of the elongation modules of TycB on the initiation and epimerization activities, we constructed a set of proteins derived from the tyrocidine synthetases of Bacillus brevis, which represent several N-terminal truncations of TycB and the first module of TycC. The latter was fused with the thioesterase domain (Te) to give TycC(1)-CAT-Te and to ensure product turnover. TycB(2)(-)(3)-AT.CATE and TycB(3)-ATE, lacking an N-terminal C domain, were capable of initiating peptide synthesis and epimerizing. In contrast, the corresponding constructs with a cognate N-terminal C domain, TycB(2)(-)(3)-T.CATE and TycB(3)-CATE, were strongly reduced in initiation and epimerization. Evidence is also provided that this reduction is due to substrate binding in an enantioselective binding pocket at the acceptor position of the C domains. By using TycB(2)(-)(3)-AT.CATE and TycB(3)-ATE, we were able to turn an elongation module into an initiation module, and to establish an in-trans system for the formation of new di- and tripeptides with recombinant NRPS modules. We also show that epimerization domains of elongation modules can in principle epimerize both aminoacyl-S-Ppant (TycB(3)-ATE) and peptidyl-S-Ppant (TycB(2)(-)(3)-AT.CATE) substrates, although the efficiency for epimerizing the noncognate aminoacyl-S-Ppant substrates appears to be lowered.
[25]
Stachelhaus T, Mootz H D, Marahiel M A. The specificity-conferring code of adenylation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Chemistry & Biology, 1999, 6(8): 493-505.
[26]
CrÃ1/4semann M, Kohlhaas C, Piel J. Evolution-guided engineering of nonribosomal peptide synthetase adenylation domains. Chemical Science, 2013, 4(3): 1041-1045.
[27]
Kries H, Niquille D L, Hilvert D. A subdomain swap strategy for reengineering nonribosomal peptides. Chemistry & Biology, 2015, 22(5): 640-648.
[28]
Thong W L, Zhang Y X, Zhuo Y, et al. Gene editing enables rapid engineering of complex antibiotic assembly lines. Nature Communications, 2021, 12: 6872.
Re-engineering biosynthetic assembly lines, including nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS) and related megasynthase enzymes, is a powerful route to new antibiotics and other bioactive natural products that are too complex for chemical synthesis. However, engineering megasynthases is very challenging using current methods. Here, we describe how CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can be exploited to rapidly engineer one of the most complex megasynthase assembly lines in nature, the 2.0 MDa NRPS enzymes that deliver the lipopeptide antibiotic enduracidin. Gene editing was used to exchange subdomains within the NRPS, altering substrate selectivity, leading to ten new lipopeptide variants in good yields. In contrast, attempts to engineer the same NRPS using a conventional homologous recombination-mediated gene knockout and complementation approach resulted in only traces of new enduracidin variants. In addition to exchanging subdomains within the enduracidin NRPS, subdomains from a range of NRPS enzymes of diverse bacterial origins were also successfully utilized.© 2021. The Author(s).
[29]
Yakimov M M, Giuliano L, Timmis K N, et al. Recombinant acylheptapeptide lichenysin: high level of production by Bacillus subtilis cells. Journal of Molecular Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2000, 2(2): 217-224.
Peptide synthetases are multi-domain proteins that catalyze the assembly, from amino acids and amino acid derivatives, of peptides and lipopeptides, some of which exhibit activities (pharmaceutical, surfactant, etc.) of considerable biotechnological importance. Although there is substantial interest in the generation of greater peptide diversity, in order to create new biotechnologically interesting products, attempts reported so far to exchange amino acid-activating minimal modules between enzymes have only yielded hybrid catalysts with poor activities. We report here the replacement of an entire first, L-Glu-, and fifth, L-Asp-incorporating modules of surfactin synthetase, to create a fully active hybrid enzyme that forms a novel peptide in high yields. Whole encoding regions of lichenysin A synthetase modules were introduced into surfactin biosynthesis operon between His140/His1185 of SrfAA and His1183/His2226 of SrfAB, the amino acid residues of a proposed active-site motif (HHXXXDG) of the condensation domains which is involved in the catalysis of nonribosomal peptide bond formation (Stachelhaus et al., 1998). When the lipopeptides produced by the recombinant Bacillus subtilis strains were purified and characterized, they appeared to be expressed approximately at the same level of the wild type surfactin and to be identical by their fatty acid profiles. We thereby demonstrate the utility of whole module swapping for designing novel peptides, for creating peptide diversity, and for redesigning existing peptides produced in performant production strains in high yields to correspond to desired peptides produced in low yields, or from strains unsuitable for production purposes.
[30]
Doekel S, Gal M F C L, Gu J Q, et al. Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase module fusions to produce derivatives of daptomycin in Streptomyces roseosporus. Microbiology (Reading, England), 2008, 154(Pt 9): 2872-2880.
[31]
Cai X F, Zhao L, Bode H B. Reprogramming promiscuous nonribosomal peptide synthetases for production of specific peptides. Organic Letters, 2019, 21(7): 2116-2120.
Pairs of docking domains (DDs) mediate the selective interations between adjacent nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) to form defined protein-protein interactions resulting in defined peptide sequences. New specific rhabdopeptide/xenortide-like peptides (RXPs) were generated by swapping of either flexible or nonfunctional DD pairs between these monomodular RXP-NRPSs against DDs from collinear NRPSs. The results presented a promising means of engineering RXP-producing NRPSs to obtain desired peptides and further substantiated the decisive role of DDs in the NRP synthesis.
[32]
Hahn M, Stachelhaus T. Selective interaction between nonribosomal peptide synthetases is facilitated by short communication-mediating domains. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2004, 101(44): 15585-15590.
[33]
Kegler C, Bode H B. Artificial splitting of a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase by inserting natural docking domains. Angewandte Chemie, 2020, 132(32): 13565-13569.
[34]
Tanovic A, Samel S A, Essen L O, et al. Crystal structure of the termination module of a nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Science, 2008, 321(5889): 659-663.
Nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are modular multidomain enzymes that act as an assembly line to catalyze the biosynthesis of complex natural products. The crystal structure of the 144-kilodalton Bacillus subtilis termination module SrfA-C was solved at 2.6 angstrom resolution. The adenylation and condensation domains of SrfA-C associate closely to form a catalytic platform, with their active sites on the same side of the platform. The peptidyl carrier protein domain is flexibly tethered to this platform and thus can move with its substrate-loaded 4'-phosphopantetheine arm between the active site of the adenylation domain and the donor side of the condensation domain. The SrfA-C crystal structure has implications for the rational redesign of NRPSs as a means of producing novel bioactive peptides.
[35]
Calcott M J, Owen J G, Lamont I L, et al. Biosynthesis of novel Pyoverdines by domain substitution in a nonribosomal peptide synthetase of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2014, 80(18): 5723-5731.
Pyoverdine is a fluorescent nonribosomal peptide siderophore made by fluorescent pseudomonads. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa nonribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) PvdD contains two modules that each incorporate an l-threonine residue at the C-terminal end of pyoverdine. In an attempt to generate modified pyoverdine peptides, we substituted alternative-substrate-specifying adenylation (A) and peptide bond-catalyzing condensation (C) domains into the second module of PvdD. When just the A domain was substituted, the resulting strains produced only wild-type pyoverdine-at high levels if the introduced A domain specified threonine or at trace levels otherwise. The high levels of pyoverdine synthesis observed whenever the introduced A domain specified threonine indicated that these nonnative A domains were able to communicate effectively with the PvdD C domain. Moreover, the unexpected observation that non-threonine-specifying A domains nevertheless incorporated threonine into pyoverdine suggests that the native PvdD C domain exhibited stronger selectivity than these A domains for the incorporated amino acid substrate (i.e., misactivation of a threonine residue by the introduced A domains was more frequent than misincorporation of a nonthreonine residue by the PvdD C domain). In contrast, substitution of both the C and A domains of PvdD generated high yields of rationally modified pyoverdines in two instances, these pyoverdines having either a lysine or a serine residue in place of the terminal threonine. However, C-A domain substitution more commonly yielded a truncated peptide product, likely due to stalling of synthesis on a nonfunctional recombinant NRPS template. Copyright © 2014, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.
[36]
Keller U, Schauwecker F. Combinatorial biosynthesis of non-ribosomal peptides. Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening, 2003, 6(6): 527-540.
[37]
Miller B R, Sundlov J A, Drake E J, et al. Analysis of the linker region joining the adenylation and carrier protein domains of the modular nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Proteins, 2014, 82(10): 2691-2702.
[38]
Beer R, Herbst K, Ignatiadis N, et al. Creating functional engineered variants of the single-module non-ribosomal peptide synthetase IndC by T domain exchange. Molecular BioSystems, 2014, 10(7): 1709-1718.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are enzymes that catalyze ribosome-independent production of small peptides, most of which are bioactive. NRPSs act as peptide assembly lines where individual, often interconnected modules each incorporate a specific amino acid into the nascent chain. The modules themselves consist of several domains that function in the activation, modification and condensation of the substrate. NRPSs are evidently modular, yet experimental proof of the ability to engineer desired permutations of domains and modules is still sought. Here, we use a synthetic-biology approach to create a small library of engineered NRPSs, in which the domain responsible for carrying the activated amino acid (T domain) is exchanged with natural or synthetic T domains. As a model system, we employ the single-module NRPS IndC from Photorhabdus luminescens that produces the blue pigment indigoidine. As chassis we use Escherichia coli. We demonstrate that heterologous T domain exchange is possible, even for T domains derived from different organisms. Interestingly, substitution of the native T domain with a synthetic one enhanced indigoidine production. Moreover, we show that selection of appropriate inter-domain linker regions is critical for functionality. Taken together, our results extend the engineering avenues for NRPSs, as they point out the possibility of combining domain sequences coming from different pathways, organisms or from conservation criteria. Moreover, our data suggest that NRPSs can be rationally engineered to control the level of production of the corresponding peptides. This could have important implications for industrial and medical applications.
[39]
Calcott M J, Ackerley D F. Portability of the thiolation domain in recombinant pyoverdine non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. BMC Microbiology, 2015, 15: 162.
Background: Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes govern the assembly of amino acids and related monomers into peptide-like natural products. A key goal of the field is to develop methods to effective recombine NRPS domains or modules, and thereby generate modified or entirely novel products. We previously showed that substitution of the condensation (C) and adenylation (A) domains in module 2 of the pyoverdine synthetase PvdD from Pseudomonas aeruginosa led to synthesis of modified pyoverdines in a minority of cases, but that more often the recombinant enzymes were non-functional. One possible explanation was that the majority of introduced C domains were unable to effectively communicate with the thiolation (T) domain immediately upstream, in the first module of PvdD. Results: To test this we first compared the effectiveness of C-A domain substitution relative to T-C-A domain substitution using three different paired sets of domains. Having previously demonstrated that the PvdD A/T domain interfaces are tolerant of domain substitution, we hypothesised that T-C-A domain substitution would lead to more functional recombinant enzymes, by maintaining native T/C domain interactions. Although we successfully generated two recombinant pyoverdines, having a serine or a N5-formyl-N5-hydroxyornithine residue in place of the terminal threonine of wild type pyoverdine, in neither case did the T-C-A domain substitution strategy lead to substantially higher product yield. To more comprehensively examine the abilities of non-native T domains to communicate effectively with the C domain of PvdD module 2 we then substituted the module 1 T domain with 18 different T domains sourced from other pyoverdine NRPS enzymes. In 15/18 cases the recombinant NRPS was functional, including 6/6 cases where the introduced T domain was located upstream of a C domain in its native context. Conclusions: Our data indicate that T domains are generally able to interact effectively with non-native C domains, contrasting with previous findings that they are not generally portable upstream of epimerisation (E) or thioesterase (TE) domains. This offers promise for NRPS recombination efforts, but also raises the possibility that some C domains are unable to efficiently accept non-native peptides at their donor site due to steric constraints or other limitations.
[40]
Bozhüyük K A J, Fleischhacker F, Linck A, et al. De novo design and engineering of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. Nature Chemistry, 2018, 10(3): 275-281.
Peptides derived from non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) represent an important class of pharmaceutically relevant drugs. Methods to generate novel non-ribosomal peptides or to modify peptide natural products in an easy and predictable way are therefore of great interest. However, although the overall modular structure of NRPSs suggests the possibility of adjusting domain specificity and selectivity, only a few examples have been reported and these usually show a severe drop in production titre. Here we report a new strategy for the modification of NRPSs that uses defined exchange units (XUs) and not modules as functional units. XUs are fused at specific positions that connect the condensation and adenylation domains and respect the original specificity of the downstream module to enable the production of the desired peptides. We also present the use of internal condensation domains as an alternative to other peptide-chain-releasing domains for the production of cyclic peptides.
[41]
Süssmuth R D, Mainz A. Nonribosomal peptide synthesis-principles and prospects. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English), 2017, 56(14): 3770-3821.
[42]
Kaniusaite M, Tailhades J, Kittilä T, et al. Understanding the early stages of peptide formation during the biosynthesis of teicoplanin and related glycopeptide antibiotics. The FEBS Journal, 2021, 288(2): 507-529.
[43]
Kaniusaite M, Goode R J A, Schittenhelm R B, et al. The diiron monooxygenase CmlA from chloramphenicol biosynthesis allows reconstitution of β-hydroxylation during glycopeptide antibiotic biosynthesis. ACS Chemical Biology, 2019, 14(12): 2932-2941.
β-Hydroxylation plays an important role in the nonribosomal peptide biosynthesis of many important natural products, including bleomycin, chloramphenicol, and the glycopeptide antibiotics (GPAs). Various oxidative enzymes have been implicated in such a process, with the mechanism of incorporation varying from installation of hydroxyl groups in amino acid precursors prior to adenylation to direct amino acid oxidation during peptide assembly. In this work, we demonstrate the utility and scope of the unusual nonheme diiron monooxygenase CmlA from chloramphenicol biosynthesis for the β-hydroxylation of a diverse range of carrier protein bound substrates by adapting this enzyme as a non-native -acting enzyme within NRPS-mediated GPA biosynthesis. The results from our study show that CmlA has a broad substrate specificity for modified phenylalanine/tyrosine residues as substrates and can be used in a practical strategy to functionally cross complement compatible NRPS biosynthesis pathways.
[44]
Kaniusaite M, Tailhades J, Marschall E A, et al. A proof-reading mechanism for non-proteinogenic amino acid incorporation into glycopeptide antibiotics. Chemical Science, 2019, 10(41): 9466-9482.
Non-ribosomal peptide biosynthesis produces highly diverse natural products through a complex cascade of enzymatic reactions that together function with high selectivity to produce bioactive peptides. The modification of non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS)-bound amino acids can introduce significant structural diversity into these peptides and has exciting potential for biosynthetic redesign. However, the control mechanisms ensuring selective modification of specific residues during NRPS biosynthesis have previously been unclear. Here, we have characterised the incorporation of the non-proteinogenic amino acid 3-chloro-β-hydroxytyrosine during glycopeptide antibiotic (GPA) biosynthesis. Our results demonstrate that the modification of this residue by -acting enzymes is controlled by the selectivity of the upstream condensation domain responsible for peptide synthesis. A proofreading thioesterase works together with this process to ensure that effective peptide biosynthesis proceeds even when the selectivity of key amino acid activation domains within the NRPS is low. Furthermore, the exchange of condensation domains with altered amino acid specificities allows the modification of such residues within NRPS biosynthesis to be controlled, which will doubtless prove important for reengineering of these assembly lines. Taken together, our results indicate the importance of the complex interplay of NRPS domains and -acting enzymes to ensure effective GPA biosynthesis, and in doing so reveals a process that is mechanistically comparable to the hydrolytic proofreading function of tRNA synthetases in ribosomal protein synthesis.This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019.
[45]
Clugston S L, Sieber S A, Marahiel M A, et al. Chirality of peptide bond-forming condensation domains in nonribosomal peptide synthetases: the C 5 domain of tyrocidine synthetase is a (D)C(L) catalyst. Biochemistry, 2003, 42(41): 12095-12104.
Nonribosomal peptides (NRP) such as the antibiotic tyrocidine have D-amino acids, introduced by epimerase (E) domains embedded within modules of the enzymatic assembly lines. We predict that the peptide bond-forming condensation (C) domains immediately downstream of E domains are D-specific for the peptidyl donor and L-specific for the aminoacyl acceptor ((D)C(L)). To validate this prediction and establish that the C(5) domain of tyrocidine synthetase is indeed (D)C(L), the apoT (thiolation) forms of module 4 (TycB(3) AT(4)E) and module 5 (TycC(1) C(5)AT(5)) were expressed. T(5) was posttranslationally primed with CoASH to introduce the HS-pantetheinyl group and autoaminoacylated with radiolabeled L-Asn* or L-Asp*. Alternate donor substrates were introduced by priming apo AT(4)E with synthetically prepared tetrapeptidyl-CoA's differing in the chirality of Phe-4, D-Phe-L-Pro-L-Phe-L-Phe-CoA, and D-Phe-L-Pro-L-Phe-D-Phe-CoA. The tetrapeptidyl-S-T(4) and L-Asp-S-T(5) were studied for peptide bond formation and chain translocation by C(5) to yield pentapeptidyl-S-T(5), whose chirality (D-L-L-D-L- vs D-L-L-L-L-) was assayed by thioester cleavage and chiral chromatography of the released pentapeptides. Only the D-Phe-4 pentapeptidyl-S-T(5) was generated, implying that only D-L-L-D-S-T(4) was utilized, proving C(5) is indeed a (D)C(L) catalyst. Furthermore, a mutant with an inactive E domain transferred tetrapeptide only when loaded with D-Phe-4 tetrapeptidyl donor, not L-Phe-4, confirming that in the wild-type assembly line C(5) only transfers D-L-L-L-tetrapeptidyl-S-T(4) after in situ epimerization by the E domain. These results contrast the observation that C(5) can make both L-Phe-L-Asn and D-Phe-L-Asn when assayed with Phe as the donor substrate. Hence, utilizing an aminoacyl-S-T(4) versus the natural peptidyl-S-T(4) donor produced misleading information regarding the specificity of the condensation domain.
[46]
Stein D B, Linne U, Marahiel M A. Utility of epimerization domains for the redesign of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. The FEBS Journal, 2005, 272(17): 4506-4520.
[47]
Doekel S, Marahiel M A. Dipeptide formation on engineered hybrid peptide synthetases. Chemistry & Biology, 2000, 7(6): 373-384.
[48]
Samel S A, Schoenafinger G, Knappe T A, et al. Structural and functional insights into a peptide bond-forming bidomain from a nonribosomal peptide synthetase. Structure, 2007, 15(7): 781-792.
The crystal structure of the bidomain PCP-C from modules 5 and 6 of the nonribosomal tyrocidine synthetase TycC was determined at 1.8 A resolution. The bidomain structure reveals a V-shaped condensation domain, the canyon-like active site groove of which is associated with the preceding peptidyl carrier protein (PCP) domain at its donor side. The relative arrangement of the PCP and the peptide bond-forming condensation (C) domain places the active sites approximately 50 A apart. Accordingly, this PCP-C structure represents a conformational state prior to peptide transfer from the donor-PCP to the acceptor-PCP domain, implying the existence of additional states of PCP-C domain interaction during catalysis. Additionally, PCP-C exerts a mode of cyclization activity that mimics peptide bond formation catalyzed by C domains. Based on mutational data and pK value analysis of active site residues, it is suggested that nonribosomal peptide bond formation depends on electrostatic interactions rather than on general acid/base catalysis.
[49]
Bozhüyük K A J, Linck A, Tietze A, et al. Modification and de novo design of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases using specific assembly points within condensation domains. Nature Chemistry, 2019, 11(7): 653-661.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) are giant enzyme machines that activate amino acids in an assembly line fashion. As NRPSs are not restricted to the incorporation of the 20 proteinogenic amino acids, their efficient manipulation would enable microbial production of a diverse range of peptides; however, the structural requirements for reprogramming NRPSs to facilitate the production of new peptides are not clear. Here we describe a new fusion point inside the condensation domains of NRPSs that results in the development of the exchange unit condensation domain (XUC) concept, which enables the efficient production of peptides, even containing non-natural amino acids, in yields up to 280 mg l. This allows the generation of more specific NRPSs, reducing the number of unwanted peptide derivatives, but also the generation of peptide libraries. The XUC might therefore be suitable for the future optimization of peptide production and the identification of bioactive peptide derivatives for pharmaceutical and other applications.
[50]
Marahiel M A. A structural model for multimodular NRPS assembly lines. Natural Product Reports, 2016, 33(2): 136-140.
This viewpoint article focuses on the structures of the dissected catalytic domains of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) associated with substrate selection and activation (A domain), substrate shuttling among the active sites (PCP domain), peptide bond formation (C domain) and product release (TE domain). Structural details of these essential components of the NRPS machinery, integrated in a didomain (PCP-C) and an elongation module (C-A-PCP), were used to generate a model for a multimodular NRPS assembly line.
[51]
Horsman M E, Hari T P A, Boddy C N. Polyketide synthase and non-ribosomal peptide synthetase thioesterase selectivity: logic gate or a victim of fate? Natural Product Reports, 2016, 33(2): 183-202.
Type 1, α/β hydrolase-like thioesterase (TE) domains are essential offloading enzymes, releasing covalently bound products from fatty acid, polyketide, and non-ribosomal peptide biosynthetic complexes. The release step can occur by attack of an exogenous nucleophile effecting hydrolysis or transesterification or by an intramolecular O-, N-, or C-nucleophile, effecting macrolactonization, macrolactamization or Claisen-like condensation of the product. Thus in addition to ensuring turnover of the pathway, TEs provide access to increased chemical diversity. We review the diversity, structure, and mechanism of PKS and NRPS TEs and discuss recent works that highlight the role of TEs as potential arbitrators in offloading. In particular, we examine cases where TEs act as logic gates that ask a particular question about the substrate and use this information to determine the substrate's fate. As the TE mechanism occurs via two steps, we analyze both the loading and release steps independently as logic gates. The use of logic gates provides an important perspective when evaluating the evolution of TEs within a pathway, as well as highlighting work towards the goal of predicting TE function in unknown and engineered pathways.
[52]
Hacker C, Cai X F, Kegler C, et al. Structure-based redesign of docking domain interactions modulates the product spectrum of a rhabdopeptide-synthesizing NRPS. Nature Communications, 2018, 9: 4366.
Several peptides in clinical use are derived from non-ribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPS). In these systems multiple NRPS subunits interact with each other in a specific linear order mediated by specific docking domains (DDs), whose structures are not known yet, to synthesize well-defined peptide products. In contrast to classical NRPSs, single-module NRPS subunits responsible for the generation of rhabdopeptide/xenortide-like peptides (RXPs) can act in different order depending on subunit stoichiometry thereby producing peptide libraries. To define the basis for their unusual interaction patterns, we determine the structures of all N-terminal DDs ((N)DDs) as well as of an (DD)-D-N-(DD)-D-C complex and characterize all putative DD interactions thermodynamically for such a system. Key amino acid residues for DD interactions are identified that upon their exchange change the DD affinity and result in predictable changes in peptide production. Recognition rules for DD interactions are identified that also operate in other megasynthase complexes.
[53]
Cai X F, Nowak S, Wesche F, et al. Entomopathogenic bacteria use multiple mechanisms for bioactive peptide library design. Nature Chemistry, 2017, 9(4): 379-386.
The production of natural product compound libraries has been observed in nature for different organisms such as bacteria, fungi and plants; however, little is known about the mechanisms generating such chemically diverse libraries. Here we report mechanisms leading to the biosynthesis of the chemically diverse rhabdopeptide/xenortide peptides (RXPs). They are exclusively present in entomopathogenic bacteria of the genera Photorhabdus and Xenorhabdus that live in symbiosis with nematodes delivering them to insect prey, which is killed and utilized for nutrition by both nematodes and bacteria. Chemical diversity of the biologically active RXPs results from a combination of iterative and flexible use of monomodular nonribosomal peptide synthetases including substrate promiscuity, enzyme cross-talk and enzyme stoichiometry as shown by in vivo and in vitro experiments. Together, this highlights several of nature's methods for diversification, or evolution, of natural products and sheds light on the biosynthesis of the bioactive RXPs.
[54]
Reinke A W, Grant R A, Keating A E. A synthetic coiled-coil interactome provides heterospecific modules for molecular engineering. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010, 132(17): 6025-6031.
The versatile coiled-coil protein motif is widely used to induce and control macromolecular interactions in biology and materials science. Yet the types of interaction patterns that can be constructed using known coiled coils are limited. Here we greatly expand the coiled-coil toolkit by measuring the complete pairwise interactions of 48 synthetic coiled coils and 7 human bZIP coiled coils using peptide microarrays. The resulting 55-member protein "interactome" includes 27 pairs of interacting peptides that preferentially heteroassociate. The 27 pairs can be used in combinations to assemble sets of 3 to 6 proteins that compose networks of varying topologies. Of special interest are heterospecific peptide pairs that participate in mutually orthogonal interactions. Such pairs provide the opportunity to dimerize two separate molecular systems without undesired crosstalk. Solution and structural characterization of two such sets of orthogonal heterodimers provide details of their interaction geometries. The orthogonal pair, along with the many other network motifs discovered in our screen, provide new capabilities for synthetic biology and other applications.
[55]
Thompson K E, Bashor C J, Lim W A, et al. SYNZIP protein interaction toolbox: in vitro and in vivo specifications of heterospecific coiled-coil interaction domains. ACS Synthetic Biology, 2012, 1(4): 118-129.
The synthetic biology toolkit contains a growing number of parts for regulating transcription and translation, but very few that can be used to control protein association. Here we report characterization of 22 previously published heterospecific synthetic coiled-coil peptides called SYNZIPs. We present biophysical analysis of the oligomerization states, helix orientations, and affinities of 27 SYNZIP pairs. SYNZIP pairs were also tested for interaction in two cell-based assays. In a yeast two-hybrid screen, >85% of 253 comparable interactions were consistent with prior in vitro measurements made using coiled-coil microarrays. In a yeast-signaling assay controlled by coiled-coil mediated scaffolding, 12 SYNZIP pairs were successfully used to down-regulate the expression of a reporter gene following treatment with α-factor. Characterization of these interaction modules dramatically increases the number of available protein interaction parts for synthetic biology and should facilitate a wide range of molecular engineering applications. Summary characteristics of 27 SYNZIP peptide pairs are reported in specification sheets available in the Supporting Information and at the SYNZIP Web site [http://keatingweb.mit.edu/SYNZIP/].
[56]
Bozhueyuek K A J, Watzel J, Abbood N, et al. Synthetic zippers as an enabling tool for engineering of non-ribosomal peptide synthetases. Angewandte Chemie (International Ed in English), 2021, 60(32): 17531-17538.
[57]
Meyer S, Kehr J C, Mainz A, et al. Biochemical dissection of the natural diversification of microcystin provides lessons for synthetic biology of NRPS. Cell Chemical Biology, 2016, 23(4): 462-471.
The cyanobacterial hepatotoxin microcystin is assembled at a non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) complex. The enormous structural diversity of this peptide, which is also found in closely related strains, is the result of frequent recombination events and point mutations. Here, we have compared the in vitro activation profiles of related monospecific and multispecific modules that either strictly incorporate leucine or arginine or incorporate chemically diverse amino acids in parallel into microcystin. By analyzing di- and tri-domain proteins we have dissected the role of adenylation and condensation domains for substrate specificity. We have further analyzed the role of subdomains and provide evidence for an extended gatekeeping function for the condensation domains of multispecific modules. By reproducing natural point mutations, we could convert a monospecific module into a multispecific module. Our findings may inspire novel synthetic biology approaches and demonstrate how recombination platforms of NRPSs have developed in nature.Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[58]
Steiniger C, Hoffmann S, Süssmuth R D. Probing exchange units for combining iterative and linear fungal nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Cell Chemical Biology, 2019, 26(11): 1526-1534.e2.
A considerable number of complex peptides are synthesized by nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs). Due to their multimodular architecture and widely understood basic biosynthetic reactions, these synthetases represent a promising target for compound diversification by active reprogramming. Nevertheless, the limited knowledge about mechanistic details such as C domain specificity hampers rational synthetase engineering. Here, we present a systematic investigation of three fungal NRPS exchange units (C-A-Mt-T, C-A-Mt-T, and A-Mt-T) focusing on the influence of C domains at heterologous domain junctions. By functionally integrating units from linear cyclosporine synthetase into iterative cyclodepsipeptide synthetases in vivo, we demonstrate that fungal NRPSs of different assembly types can be combined using different swapping sites, while respecting the C domain integrity and specificity. Based on 24 hybrid synthetases, we suggest exchange rules for efficient fungal NRPS engineering. The findings are of importance for rational synthetase design and provide a new set of options for combinatorial reprogramming.Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[59]
Stachelhaus T, Marahiel M A. Modular structure of peptide synthetases revealed by dissection of the multifunctional enzyme GrsA (*). Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1995, 270(11): 6163-6169.
Analysis of the primary structure of peptide synthetases involved in non-ribosomal synthesis of peptide antibiotics revealed a highly conserved and ordered domain structure. These functional units, which are about 1000 amino acids in length, are believed to be essential for amino acid activation and thioester formation. To delineate the minimal extension of such a domain, we have amplified and cloned truncated fragments of the grsA gene, encoding the 1098-amino acid multifunctional gramicidin S synthetase 1, GrsA. The overexpressed His6-tagged GrsA derivatives were affinity-purified, and the catalytic properties of the deletion mutants were examined by biochemical studies including ATP-dependent amino acid activation, carboxyl thioester formation, and the ability to racemize the covalently bound phenylalanine from L- to the D-isomer. These studies revealed a core fragment (PheAT-His) that comprises the first 656 amino acid residues of GrsA, which restored all activities of the native protein, except racemization of phenylalanine. A further deletion of about 100 amino acids at the C-terminal end of the GrsA core fragment (PheAT-His), including the putative thioester binding motif LGGHSL, produced a 556-amino acid fragment (PheA-His) that shows a phenylalanine-dependent aminoacyl adenylation, but almost no thioester formation. A 291-amino acid deletion at the C terminus of the native GrsA, that contains a putative racemization site resulted in complete loss of racemization ability (PheATS-His). However, it retained the functions of specific amino acid activation and thioester formation. The results presented defined biochemically the minimum size of a peptide synthetase domain and revealed the locations of the functional modules involved in substrate recognition and ATP-dependent activation as well as in thioester formation and racemization.
[60]
Stachelhaus T, Marahiel M A. Modular structure of genes encoding multifunctional peptide synthetases required for non-ribosomal peptide synthesis. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1995, 125(1): 3-14.
Peptide synthetases are large multienzyme complexes that catalyze the non-ribosomal synthesis of a structurally diverse family of bioactive peptides. They possess a multidomain structure and employ the thiotemplate mechanism to activate, modify and link together by amide or ester bonds the constituent amino acids of the peptide product. The domains, which represent the functional building units of peptide synthetases, appear to act as independent enzymes whose specific linkage order forms the protein-template that defines the sequence of the incorporated amino acids. Two types of domains have been characterized in peptide synthetases of bacterial and fungal origin: type I comprises about 600 amino acids and contains at least two modules involved in substrate recognition, adenylation and thioester formation, whereas type II domains carry in addition an insertion of about 430 amino acids that may function as a N-methyltransferase module. The role of other genes associated with bacterial operons encoding peptide synthetases is also discussed.
[61]
Bloudoff K, Alonzo D A, Schmeing T M. Chemical probes allow structural insight into the condensation reaction of nonribosomal peptide synthetases. Cell Chem Biol, 2016, 23(3): 331-339.
Nonribosomal peptide synthetases (NRPSs) synthesize a vast variety of small molecules, including antibiotics, antitumors, and immunosuppressants. The NRPS condensation (C) domain catalyzes amide bond formation, the central chemical step in nonribosomal peptide synthesis. The catalytic mechanism and substrate determinants of the reaction are under debate. We developed chemical probes to structurally study the NRPS condensation reaction. These substrate analogs become covalently tethered to a cysteine introduced near the active site, to mimic covalent substrate delivery by carrier domains. They are competent substrates in the condensation reaction and behave similarly to native substrates. Co-crystal structures show C domain-substrate interactions, and suggest that the catalytic histidine's principle role is to position the α-amino group for nucleophilic attack. Structural insight provided by these co-complexes also allowed us to alter the substrate specificity profile of the reaction with a single point mutation. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[62]
Schoppet M, Peschke M, Kirchberg A, et al. The biosynthetic implications of late-stage condensation domain selectivity during glycopeptide antibiotic biosynthesis. Chemical Science, 2018, 10(1): 118-133.
[63]
Calcott M J, Owen J G, Ackerley D F. Efficient rational modification of non-ribosomal peptides by adenylation domain substitution. Nature Communications, 2020, 11: 4554.
Non-ribosomal peptide synthetase (NRPS) enzymes form modular assembly-lines, wherein each module governs the incorporation of a specific monomer into a short peptide product. Modules are comprised of one or more key domains, including adenylation (A) domains, which recognise and activate the monomer substrate; condensation (C) domains, which catalyse amide bond formation; and thiolation (T) domains, which shuttle reaction intermediates between catalytic domains. This arrangement offers prospects for rational peptide modification via substitution of substrate-specifying domains. For over 20 years, it has been considered that C domains play key roles in proof-reading the substrate; a presumption that has greatly complicated rational NRPS redesign. Here we present evidence from both directed and natural evolution studies that any substrate-specifying role for C domains is likely to be the exception rather than the rule, and that novel non-ribosomal peptides can be generated by substitution of A domains alone. We identify permissive A domain recombination boundaries and show that these allow us to efficiently generate modified pyoverdine peptides at high yields. We further demonstrate the transferability of our approach in the PheATE-ProCAT model system originally used to infer C domain substrate specificity, generating modified dipeptide products at yields that are inconsistent with the prevailing dogma.

基金

*国家自然科学基金(22078295)

PDF(3299 KB)

1536

Accesses

0

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/