| 综述 |
|
|
|
|
| 微生物利用木质纤维素的研究进展 |
| 马泽林1,2,3, 刘家亨1,2,3, 黄序4, 财音青格乐1,2, 朱宏吉1,2 |
1. 天津大学化工学院 天津 300072;
2. 系统生物工程教育部重点实验室 天津 300072;
3. 天津化学化工协同创新中心合成生物学平台 天津 300072;
4. 中粮营养健康研究院 北京 102209 |
|
| Research Progress on Utilization of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Microorganisms |
| MA Ze-lin1,2,3, LIU Jia-heng1,2,3, HUANG Xu4, CAIYIN Qing-gele1,2, ZHU Hong-ji1,2 |
1. Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China;
2. Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, China;
3. Syn Bio Research Platform, Collaborative Innovation Center of Chemical Science and Engineering, Tianjin 300072, China;
4. China Oil & Foodstuffs Corporation(COFCO Nutrition and Health Research Institute, Beijing 102209, China |
引用本文:
马泽林, 刘家亨, 黄序, 财音青格乐, 朱宏吉. 微生物利用木质纤维素的研究进展[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2017, 37(6): 124-133.
MA Ze-lin, LIU Jia-heng, HUANG Xu, CAIYIN Qing-gele, ZHU Hong-ji. Research Progress on Utilization of Lignocellulosic Biomass by Microorganisms. China Biotechnology, 2017, 37(6): 124-133.
链接本文:
https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/10.13523/j.cb.20170618
或
https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/Y2017/V37/I6/124
|
[1] Graham-Rowe D. Agriculture:Beyond food versus fuel. Nature, 2011, 474(7352):S6-S8.
[2] 李景明, 薛梅. 中国生物质能利用现状与发展前景. 农业科技管理, 2010, 29(2):1-4. Li J M, Xue M. Present situation and prospect of biomass energy utilization in China. Management of Agricultural Science and Technology, 2010, 29(2):1-4.
[3] Li C, Cheng G, Balan V, et al. Influence of physico-chemical changes on enzymatic digestibility of ionic liquid and AFEX pretreated corn stover. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(13):6928-6936.
[4] Mosier N, Wyman C, Dale B, et al. Features of promising technologies for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresource Technology, 2005, 96(6):673-686.
[5] Sun Y, Cheng J. Hydrolysis of lignocellulosic materials for ethanol production:a review. Bioresource Technology, 2002, 83(1):1-11.
[6] Papapetridis I, Dijk M, Dobbe A P, et al. Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6. Microbial Cell Factories, 2016, 15(1):67-83.
[7] Shaw A J, Podkaminer K K, Desai S G, et al. Metabolic engineering of a thermophilic bacterium to produce ethanol at high yield. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008, 105(37):13769-13774.
[8] Gao D, Chundawat S P, Sethi A, et al. Increased enzyme binding to substrate is not necessary for more efficient cellulose hydrolysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2013, 110(27):10922-10927.
[9] Edwards M C, Henriksen E D, Yomano L P, et al. Addition of genes for cellobiase and pectinolytic activity in Escherichia coli for fuel ethanol production from pectin-rich lignocellulosic biomas. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2011, 77(15):5184-5191.
[10] Galbe M, Zacchi G. Pretreatment:the key to efficient utilization of lignocellulosic materials. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 46(12):70-78.
[11] Viikari L, Vehmaanperä J, Koivula A. Lignocellulosic ethanol:from science to industry. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2012, 46(11):13-24.
[12] Ravindran R, Jaiswal A K. A comprehensive review on pre-treatment strategy for lignocellulosic food industry waste:challenges and opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 1(199):92-102.
[13] Qiao J J, Zhang Y F, Sun L F, et al. Production of spent mushroom substrate hydrolysates useful for cultivation of Lactococcus lactis by dilute sulfuric acid, cellulase and xylanase treatment. Bioresource Technology, 2011, 102(17):8046-8051.
[14] Zhu H J, Liu J H, Sun L F, et al. Combined alkali and acid pretreatment of spent mushroom substrate for reducing sugar and biofertilizer production. Bioresource Technology, 2013, 136(5):257-266.
[15] 赵鑫. 木质纤维素联合预处理法的研究进展. 山东化工, 2016, 45(11):39-41. Zhao X. The Review of combination pretreatment methods of lignocellulosic. Shandong Chemical Industry, 2016,45(11):39-41.
[16] Vanneste J, Ennaert T, Vanhulsel A, et al. Unconventional Pretreatment of lignocellulose with low temperature plasma. ChemSusChem, 2017,10(1):14-31.
[17] Nogué V S, Karhumaa K. Xylose fermentation as a challenge for commercialization of lignocellulosic fuels and chemicals. Biotechnology Letters, 2015, 37(4):761-772.
[18] Bundaleska N, Tatarova E, Dias F M, et al. Air-water 'tornado'-type microwave plasmas applied for sugarcane biomass treatment. Journal of Physics D:Applied Physics, 2013, 47(5):055201.
[19] Benoit M, Rodrigues A, Vigier K D, et al. Combination of ball-milling and non-thermal atmospheric plasma as physical treatments for the saccharification of microcrystalline cellulose. Green Chemistry, 2012, 14(8):2212-2215.
[20] Travaini R, Martín-Juárez J, Lorenzo-Hernando A, et al. Ozonolysis:An advantageous pretreatment for lignocellulosic biomass revisited. Bioresource Technology, 2016, 199(1):2-12.
[21] Li C, Wang L, Chen Z, et al. Ozonolysis pretreatment of maize stover:The interactive effect of sample particle size and moisture on ozonolysis process. Bioresource Technology, 2015, 183(5):240-247.
[22] Bule M V, Gao A H, Hiscox B, et al. Structural modification of lignin and characterization of pretreated wheat straw by ozonation. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2013, 61(16):3916-3925.
[23] Amorim J, Oliveira C, Souza-Corrêa J A, et al. Treatment of sugarcane bagasse lignin employing atmospheric pressure microplasma jet in argon. Plasma Processes and Polymers, 2013, 10(8):670-678.
[24] Wiman M, Dienes D, Hansen M A, et al. Cellulose accessibility determines the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce. Bioresource Technology, 2012, 126(12):208-215.
[25] Rana V, Eckard A D, Teller P, et al. On-site enzymes produced from Trichoderma reesei RUT- C30 and Aspergillus saccharolyticus for hydrolysis of wet exploded corn stover and loblolly pine. Bioresource Technology, 2014, 154(2):282-289.
[26] Nghiem N P, Kim T H, Yoo C G, et al. Enzymatic fractionation of SAA-pretreated barley straw for production of fuel ethanol and astaxanthin as a value-added co-product. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 2013, 171(2):341-351.
[27] Han S H, Cho D H, Kim Y H, et al. Biobutanol production from 2-year-old willow biomass by acid hydrolysis and acetone-butanol-ethanol fermentation. Energy, 2013, 61(11):13-17.
[28] Zeng A P, Sabra W. Microbial production of diols as platform chemicals:recent progresses. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 2011, 22(6):749-757.
[29] Kuhad R C, Gupta R, Khasa Y P, et al. Bioethanol production from pentose sugars:Current status and future prospects. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2011, 15(9):4950-4962.
[30] Scalcinati G, Otero J M, Van Vleet J R, et al. Evolutionary engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for efficient aerobic xylose consumption. FEMS Yeast Research, 2012, 12(5):582-597.
[31] Tanaka K, Komiyama A, Sonomoto K, et al. Two different pathways for D-xylose metabolism and the effect of xylose concentration on the yield coefficient of L-lactate in mixed-acid fermentation by the lactic acid bacterium Lactococcus lactis IO- 1. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2002, 60(10):160-167.
[32] Chang S F, Ho N W. Cloning the yeast xylulokinase gene for the improvement of xylose fermentation. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 1988, 17(1):313-318.
[33] N lling J, Breton G, Omelchenko M V, et al. Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the solvent-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum. Journal of Bacteriology, 2001, 183(16):4823-4838.
[34] Jin L, Zhang H, Chen L, et al. Combined overexpression of genes involved in pentose phosphate pathway enables enhanced D-xylose utilization by Clostridium acetobutylicum. Journal of Biotechnology, 2014, 3(173):7-9.
[35] Zhou H, Cheng J, Wang B L, et al. Xylose isomerase overexpression along with engineering of the pentose phosphate pathway and evolutionary engineering enable rapid xylose utilization and ethanol production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Engineering, 2012, 14(6):611-622.
[36] Yim H, Haselbeck R, Niu W, et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli for direct production of 1, 4-butanediol. Nature Chemical Biology, 2011, 7(7):445-452.
[37] Weimberg R. Pentose oxidation by Pseudomonas fragi. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1961, 236(3):629-635.
[38] Radek A, Krumbach K, Gätgens J, et al. Engineering of Corynebacterium glutamicum for minimized carbon loss during utilization of D-xylose containing substrates. Journal of Biotechnology, 2014, 192(12):156-160.
[39] Liu H, Lu T. Autonomous production of 1, 4-butanediol via a de novo biosynthesis pathway in engineered Escherichia coli. Metabolic Engineering, 2015, 29(5):135-141.
[40] Tai Y S, Xiong M, Jambunathan P, et al. Engineering nonphosphorylative metabolism to generate lignocellulose-derived products. Nature Chemical Biology, 2016, 12(2):247-253.
[41] Gírio F M, Carvalheiro F, Duarte L C, et al. Deconstruction of the hemicellulose fraction from lignocellulosic materials into simple sugars d-Xylitol. Berlin Heidelberg:Springer, 2012. 3-37.
[42] G rke B, Stülke J. Carbon catabolite repression in bacteria:many ways to make the most out of nutrients. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2008, 6(8):613-624.
[43] Deutscher J, Francke C, Postma P W. How phosphotransferase system-related protein phosphorylation regulates carbohydrate metabolism in bacteria. Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews, 2006, 70(4):939-1031.
[44] Jarmander J, Hallstr? m B M, Larsson G. Simultaneous uptake of lignocellulose-based monosaccharides by Escherichia coli. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2014, 111(6):1108-1115.
[45] Escalante A, Cervantes A S, Gosset G, et al. Current knowledge of the Escherichia coli phosphoenolpyruvate-carbohydrate phosphotransferase system:peculiarities of regulation and impact on growth and product formation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 94(6):1483-1494.
[46] Nakashima N, Tamura T. A new carbon catabolite repression mutation of Escherichia coli, mlc, and its use for producing isobutanol. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2012, 114(1):38-44.
[47] Tsakraklides V, Shaw A J, Miller B B, et al. Carbon catabolite repression in Thermoanaerobacterium saccharolyticum. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2012, 5(1):85.
[48] Cirino P C, Chin J W, Ingram L O. Engineering Escherichia coli for xylitol production from glucose-xylose mixtures. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2006, 95(6):1167-1176.
[49] Groff D, Benke P I, Batth T S, et al. Supplementation of intracellular XylR leads to coutilization of hemicellulose sugars. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2012, 78(7):2221-2229.
[50] Wu Y, Yang Y, Ren C, et al. Molecular modulation of pleiotropic regulator CcpA for glucose and xylose coutilization by solvent-producing Clostridium acetobutylicum. Metabolic Engineering, 2015, 3(28):169-179.
[51] Jojima T, Omumasaba C A, Inui M, et al. Sugar transporters in efficient utilization of mixed sugar substrates:current knowledge and outlook. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 85(3):471-480.
[52] Sun L, Zeng X, Yan C, et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature, 2012, 490(7420):361-366.
[53] Hector R E, Qureshi N, Hughes S R, et al. Expression of a heterologous xylose transporter in a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to utilize xylose improves aerobic xylose consumption. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2008, 80(4):675-684.
[54] Khankal R, Chin J W, Cirino P C. Role of xylose transporters in xylitol production from engineered Escherichia coli. Journal of Biotechnology, 2008, 134(3):246-252.
[55] Jeon W Y, Yoon B H, Ko B S, et al. Xylitol production is increased by expression of codon-optimized Neurospora crassa xylose reductase gene in Candida tropicalis. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2012, 35(1-2):191-198.
[56] Almeida J R, Bertilsson M, Gorwa-Grauslund M F, et al. Metabolic effects of furaldehydes and impacts on biotechnological processes. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2009, 82(4):625.
[57] Taylor M P, Mulako I, Tuffin M, et al. Understanding physiological responses to pre-treatment inhibitors in ethanologenic fermentations. Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 7(9):1169-1181.
[58] Heer D, Sauer U. Identification of furfural as a key toxin in lignocellulosic hydrolysates and evolution of a tolerant yeast strain. Microbial Biotechnology, 2008, 1(6):497-506.
[59] Hasunuma T, Sung K, Sanda T, et al. Efficient fermentation of xylose to ethanol at high formic acid concentrations by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2011, 90(3):997-1004.
[60] Li Y C, Gou Z X, Liu Z S, et al. Synergistic effects of TAL1 over-expression and PHO13 deletion on the weak acid inhibition of xylose fermentation by industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. Biotechnology Letters, 2014, 36(10):2011-2021.
[61] Hasunuma T, Ismail K S, Nambu Y, et al. Co-expression of TAL1 and ADH1 in recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates in the presence of furfural. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2014, 117(2):165-169.
[62] Royce L A, Yoon J M, Chen Y, et al. Evolution for exogenous octanoic acid tolerance improves carboxylic acid production and membrane integrity. Metabolic Engineering, 2015, 29(5):180-188.
[63] Wallace-Salinas V, Gorwa-Grauslund M F. Adaptive evolution of an industrial strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for combined tolerance to inhibitors and temperature. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2013, 6(1):151.
[64] Dafoe J T, Daugulis A J. In situ product removal in fermentation systems:improved process performance and rational extractant selection. Biotechnology Letters, 2014, 36(3):443-460.
[65] Klaassen P, Kolen C, Van Maris A, et al. Yeast strains engineered to produce ethanol from acetate. Patent WO2014033019 A1. 2014-3-6.
[66] Zelle R M, Shaw I V, van Dijken J P. Method for acetate consumption during ethanolic fermentaion of cellulosic feedstocks. U.S. Patent, 14/075,846. 2013-11-8.
[67] Hou J, Shen Y, Jiao C, et al. Characterization and evolution of xylose isomerase screened from the bovine rumen metagenome in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2016, 121(2):160-165.
[68] Meijnen J P, de Winde J H, Ruijssenaars H J. Establishment of oxidative D-xylose metabolism in Pseudomonas putida S12. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(9):2784-2791.
[69] Liu H, Ramos K R, Valdehuesa K N, et al. Biosynthesis of ethylene glycol in Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2013, 97(8):3409-3417.
[70] Uppugundla N, da Costa Sousa L, Chundawat S P, et al. A comparative study of ethanol production using dilute acid, ionic liquid and AFEXTM pretreated corn stover. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2014, 7(1):72.
[71] Hasunuma T, Ismail K S, Nambu Y, et al. Co-expression of TAL1 and ADH1 in recombinant xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae improves ethanol production from lignocellulosic hydrolysates in the presence of furfural. Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 2014, 117(2):165-169.
[72] Smith J, Van Rensburg E, G? rgens J F. Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase. BMC Biotechnology, 2014, 14(1):41-58.
[73] Bai W, Tai Y S, Wang J, et al. Engineering nonphosphorylative metabolism to synthesize mesaconate from lignocellulosic sugars in Escherichia coli. Metabolic Engineering, 2016, 38(11):285-292.
[74] Jeon W Y, Shim W Y, Lee S H, et al. Effect of heterologous xylose transporter expression in Candida tropicalis on xylitol production rate. Bioprocess and Biosystems Engineering, 2013, 36(6):809-817.
[75] Oh E J, Ha S J, Kim S R, et al. Enhanced xylitol production through simultaneous co-utilization of cellobiose and xylose by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metabolic Engineering, 2013, 15(1):226-234.
[76] Nair N U, Zhao H. Selective reduction of xylose to xylitol from a mixture of hemicellulosic sugars. Metabolic Engineering, 2010, 12(5):462-468.
[77] Sasaki M, Jojima T, Inui M, et al. Xylitol production by recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum under oxygen deprivation. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2010, 86(4):1057-1066.
[78] Liu H, Hu H R, Jin Y H, et al. Co-fermentation of a mixture of glucose and xylose to fumaric acid by Rhizopus arrhizus RH 7-13-9# . Bioresource Technology,2017,223(6):30-33.
[79] Wei N, Quarterman J, Kim S R, et al. Enhanced biofuel production through coupled acetic acid and xylose consumption by engineered yeast. Nature Communications, 2013, 4(8):2580.
[80] Zhang J G, Liu X Y, He X P, et al. Improvement of acetic acid tolerance and fermentation performance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by disruption of the FPS1 aquaglyceroporin gene. Biotechnology Letters, 2011, 33(2):277-284.
[81] Heer D, Heine D, Sauer U. Resistance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to high concentrations of furfural is based on NADPH-dependent reduction by at least two oxireductases. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2009, 75(24):7631-7638.
[82] Madhavan A, Srivastava A, Kondo A, et al. Bioconversion of lignocellulose-derived sugars to ethanol by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 2012, 32(1):22-48.
[83] Subtil T, Boles E. Competition between pentoses and glucose during uptake and catabolism in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2012, 5(1):14.
[84] Bellissimi E, Van Dijken J P, Pronk J T, et al. Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Research, 2009, 9(3):358-364. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
