Please wait a minute...

中国生物工程杂志

CHINA BIOTECHNOLOGY
中国生物工程杂志  2016, Vol. 36 Issue (4): 12-17    DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.20160402
转基因作物商业化20周年纪念专辑     
Malatesta转基因研究:引证分析及相关证据
马彩云1, 逄金辉1, 石晓华2, 胡瑞法2
1. 北京理工大学图书馆 北京 100081;
2. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院 北京 100081
Malatesta's Transgenic Research: Citation Analysis and Relevant Evidence
MA Cai-yun1, PANG Jin-hui1, SHI Xiao-hua2, HU Rui-fa2
1. Library, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China
 全文: PDF(973 KB)   HTML
摘要:

发表多篇以转基因农产品饲喂动物而导致健康损害论文的维罗纳大学(University of Verona)学者Manuela Malatesta,是国际上采用实验方法研究转基因生物安全领域有影响力的学者之一。通过对美国Web of Science数据平台全部论文的检索,重点分析了其所发表的10篇转基因毒理学论文的研究内容、研究方法与结论,并追踪其研究的相关证据及学术界对其研究的评价,在此基础上,分析该研究方法与结论的可靠性。研究发现,Malatesta所发表转基因存在安全隐患的10篇研究论文,由于其研究材料及方法上所存在的问题除了个别存在明显错误的论文无法重现而被学术界所否定外,其余论文均被后续采用规范研究方法的同类研究所推翻。

关键词: 安全引证分析转基因    
Abstract:

Manuela Malatesta, University of Verona scholar, published a number of papers that feeding animals with genetically modified agricultural products caused health damage. She is one of the international influential scholars in researching the safety of Genetically Modified Organisms using experimental methods. Based on Malatesta's literature from Web of Science data, the research contents, methods and conclusions of 10 papers which hold toxicology view of Genetically Modified agricultural products were investigated. According to its related tracking evidence and academia evaluation, its reliability of research methods and conclusions were discussesd. The results showed that Malatesta's literature, which hold unsafe view of Genetically Modified agricultural products, were denied by the academia and follow-up similar studies using normative research methods since Malatesta's research materials and methods had problems.

Key words: Safety    Citation analysis    Transgenic
收稿日期: 2016-02-25 出版日期: 2016-04-25
ZTFLH:  Q789  
基金资助:

国家自然科学基金国际合作资助项目(71210004)

通讯作者: 胡瑞法     E-mail: ruifa@bit.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  

引用本文:

马彩云, 逄金辉, 石晓华, 胡瑞法. Malatesta转基因研究:引证分析及相关证据[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2016, 36(4): 12-17.

MA Cai-yun, PANG Jin-hui, SHI Xiao-hua, HU Rui-fa. Malatesta's Transgenic Research: Citation Analysis and Relevant Evidence. China Biotechnology, 2016, 36(4): 12-17.

链接本文:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/10.13523/j.cb.20160402        https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/Y2016/V36/I4/12

[1] 石晓华 封勇丽 逄金辉等. 塞拉利尼转基因"致癌"研究:从试验方法到结论. 中国生物工程杂志,2015,7:111-116. Shi X H, Feng Y L, Pang J H, et al. Séralini's"GMO carcinogenic study": from the Experimental Method to conclusions. China Biotechnology, 2015,7:111-116.
[2] Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Rossi L, et al. Ultrastructural analysis of pancreatic acinar cells from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Journal of Anatomy, 2002,201: 409-415 .
[3] Malatesta M, Caporaloni C, Gavaudan S, et al. Ultrastructural morphometrical and immunocytochemical analyses of hepatocyte nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. Cell Structure and Function, 2002,27(4):173-180.
[4] Malatesta M, Biggiogera M, Manuali E, et al. Fine structural analyses of pancreatic acinar cell nuclei from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. European Journal of Histochemistry, 2003,47(4):385-388.
[5] Vecchio L, Cisterna B, Malatesta M. Ultrastructural analysis of testes from mice fed on genetically modified soybean. European Journal of Histochemistry, 2004,48(4):449-453.
[6] Malatesta M, Tiberi C, Baldelli B, et al. Reversibility of hepatocyte nuclear modifications in mice fed on genetically modified soybean. European Journal of Histochemistry, 2005,49(3):237-241.
[7] Malatesta M, Boraldi F, Annovi G, et al. A long-term study on female mice fed on a genetically modified soybean: effects on liver ageing. Histochemistry and Cell Biology, 2008,130(5):967-977.
[8] Malatesta M, Perdoni F, Santin G, et al. Hepatoma tissue culture (HTC) cells as a model for investigating the effects of low concentrations of herbicide on cell structure and function. Toxicology in Vitro, 2008,22:1853-1860 .
[9] Cisterna B, Flach F, Vecchio L, et al. Can a genetically-modified organism-containing diet influence embryo development? A preliminary study on pre-implantation mouse embryos. European Journal of Histochemistry, 2008,52(4):263-267.
[10] Trabalza-Marinucci M, Brandi G, Rondini C, et al. A three-year longitudinal study on the effects of a diet containing genetically modified Bt176 maize on the health status and performance of sheep. Livestock Science, 2008,113(2-3):178-190.
[11] Battistelli S, Citterio B, Baldelli B, et al. Histochemical and morphometrical study of mouse intestine epithelium after a long term diet containing genetically modified soybean. European Journal of Histochemistry, 2010,54(3):154-157.
[12] 逄金辉 马彩云 封勇丽,等. 转基因作物生物安全:科学证据. 中国生物工程杂志,2016,1:122-127. Pang J H, Ma C Y, Feng Y L, et al. Biological safety of genetically modified crops: scientific evidence. China Biotechnology, 2016,1:122-127.
[13] Snell C, Bernheim A, Berge J B, et al. Assessment of the health impact of GM plant diets in long-term and multigenerational animal feeding trials: a literature review. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2012, 50(3-4):1134-1148.
[14] Domingo J L, Bordonaba J G. A literature review on the safety assessment of genetically modified plants. Environment International, 2011, 37(4): 734-742.
[15] DeFrancesco L. How safe does transgenic food need to be?. Nature Biotechnology, 2013, 31(9): 794-802.
[16] Daleprane J B, Chagas M A, Vellarde G C, et al. The impact of non-and genetically modified soybean diets in Aorta wall remodeling. Journal of Food Science, 2010,75(7): T126-T131.
[17] Sbruzzi F A, Venancio V P, Resck M C, et al. Transgenic and conventional Brazilian soybeans don't cause or prevent preneoplastic colon lesions or oxidative stress in a 90-day in vivo study. Revista de Nutrição, 2013, 26(4): 443-453.
[18] Appenzeller L M, Malley L, Mackenzie S A, et al. Subchronic feeding study with genetically modified stacked trait lepidopteran and coleopteran resistant maize grain in sprague-dawley rats. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2009, 47(7):1512-1520.

[1] 刘旭霞,杨安珂. 美国SECURE规则评析及其对中国的启示[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(9): 126-135.
[2] 梁晋刚,张旭冬,毕研哲,王颢潜,张秀杰. 转基因抗虫玉米发展现状与展望*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(6): 98-104.
[3] 马丽丽,易盼盼,敖妮花,焦洪涛,雷瑞鹏,刘欢. 基于学科类别和富集分析的生物安全研究领域学科交叉研究*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(12): 116-124.
[4] 何伟,祝蕾,刘欣泽,安学丽,万向元. 玉米遗传转化与商业化转基因玉米开发*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(12): 13-23.
[5] 王小理. 生物安全时代:新生物科技变革与国家安全治理*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(9): 95-109.
[6] 梁振鑫,刘芳,张玮,刘庆友,李力. 抗p185 erb B2人鼠嵌合抗体ChAb26转基因小鼠乳腺生物反应器的制备与验证 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(8): 40-51.
[7] 武奥申,刘小娜,刘昀赫,刘刚,刘雷. 二代基因测序数据管理和大数据平台在精准医学中的应用[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(2): 101-111.
[8] 王友华,邹婉侬,柳小庆,王兆华,孙国庆. 全球转基因玉米专利信息分析与技术展望 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(12): 83-94.
[9] 杨飞芸,杨天瑞,刘坤,崔爽,王瑞刚,李国婧. 异源表达CiRS基因拟南芥的黄酮代谢及抑菌能力研究 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(11): 22-30.
[10] 曾强,孟秋成,邓力华,李锦江,于江辉,翁绿水,肖国樱. 抗草甘膦、抗螟虫水稻E1C608的鉴定和重要表型特征分析 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(11): 31-38.
[11] 陈秀秀,吴成林,周丽君. 人源抗体制备及临床应用研究进展 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(10): 90-96.
[12] 徐琳杰,刘培磊,李文龙,孙卓婧,宋贵文. 国际转基因标识制度变动趋势分析及对我国的启示 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(9): 94-98.
[13] 韩明明,罗玉萍. 内源CD133 +细胞示踪小鼠模型的制备和鉴定 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(6): 58-62.
[14] 周天盟,刘旭霞. 论预防原则在欧盟转基因生物监管中的困境与出路 *——基于意大利Fidenato案的分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(6): 95-102.
[15] 姚民,朱淑华,李佛生,张士彦,唐琳. 异源表达AtCYSa基因烟草的耐盐和抗虫特性分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(4): 8-16.