塞拉利尼转基因“致癌”研究:从试验方法到结论

doi:10.13523/j.cb.20150715

中国生物工程杂志

2015, Vol. 35

Issue (7): 111-116 DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.20150715

农业生物技术专栏

塞拉利尼转基因“致癌”研究:从试验方法到结论

石晓华^1,3, 封勇丽², 逄金辉², 胡瑞法¹

1. 北京理工大学管理与经济学院北京 100081;
2. 北京理工大学图书馆北京 100081;
3. 河南科技学院/河南省现代生物育种协同创新中心新乡 453003

Séralini's “GMO Carcinogenic Study”: From the Experimental Method to Conclusions

SHI Xiao-hua^1,3, FENG Yong-li², PANG Jin-hui², HU Rui-fa¹

1. School of Management and Economics, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
2. Library, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing 100081, China;
3. Henan Institute of Science and Technology/Henan Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Biological Breeding, Xinxiang 453003, China

全文: PDF(459 KB) HTML

摘要：

法国学者塞拉利尼的转基因致癌论文在学术界和国际社会引起了极大关注与争议。在对塞拉利尼论文发表的各界反应及相关研究文献追溯的基础上,对其试验材料、试验设计、数据统计等进行了分析。研究结果表明,塞拉利尼的研究,存在试验材料无法确保其结论的唯一性、试验样本不能保证其研究结论的可重现性,以及试验结果存在多种解读等问题。研究结果也对塞拉利尼论文所发杂志的审稿制度提出了质疑,认为这是塞拉利尼论文目前仍是影响国际社会对转基因安全性争议的原因之一。此外,在其施引文献中,有试验数据支撑的研究结果均表明了转基因作物饲喂动物未显著影响动物的健康。因此,"转基因致癌"是非科学研究的结论,学者和公众有必要回归科学理性的轨道探讨和解决有争议的问题。

关键词： 致癌研究; 转基因; 塞拉利尼

Abstract:

Séralini's "GM corn carcinogenic study" paper has attracted many concerns and aroused a great controversy in academia and the international community. After recalling the reaction from various communities and analyzing the relevant published literatures, Séralini's research materials, experimental design, data statistics were investigated. The results showed that the materials cannot ensure the uniqueness of its conclusions, and test samples cannot guarantee its conclusions of reproducibility, there can be various interpretations of the results. The results also argued the review system of the journal which hastily published Séralini's paper. It is one of reasons why Séralini's paper still affects international social controversy over genetically modified crops' safety. Furthermore, in which it was cited in the web of science literature, all the study results supported by the experimental data showed that genetically modified crops feeding animals did not significantly affect the health of the animals .Therefore,"GMO's carcinogenic" is a non-scientific conclusion, It is necessary to discuss and resolve controversial issues for scholars and the general public by scientific rational ways.

Key words: Carcinogenic study GMO ralini Sé

收稿日期: 2015-05-06 出版日期: 2015-07-25

ZTFLH:

Q78

基金资助:

国家自然科学基金国际合作资助项目(71210004)

通讯作者: 逄金辉 E-mail: pangjinhui@bit.edu.cn

	服务
	把本文推荐给朋友
	加入引用管理器
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	作者相关文章

引用本文:

石晓华, 封勇丽, 逄金辉, 胡瑞法. 塞拉利尼转基因“致癌”研究:从试验方法到结论[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2015, 35(7): 111-116.

SHI Xiao-hua, FENG Yong-li, PANG Jin-hui, HU Rui-fa. Séralini's “GMO Carcinogenic Study”: From the Experimental Method to Conclusions. China Biotechnology, 2015, 35(7): 111-116.

链接本文:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/10.13523/j.cb.20150715 或 https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/Y2015/V35/I7/111

[1] Séralini G E, Clair E, Mesnage R, et al. Long term toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2012,50(11):4221-4231.

[2] Séralini G E,Clair E, Mesnage R, et al. Republished study: long-term toxicity of a roundup herbicide and a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize. Environmental Sciences Europe, 2014, 26(14):1-17.

[3] Houllier F.Bring more rigour to GM research. Nature, 2012, 491(11): 327.

[4] Cambridge M A. Elsevier Announces Article Retraction from Journal Food and Chemical Toxicology.
[2009-12-07]. http://www.elsevier.com/about/press-releases/research-and-journals/elsevier-announces-article-retraction-from-journal-food-and-chemical-toxicology.

[5] Casassus B. Paper claiming GM link tumours republished. Nature News, 2014,6(24):1.

[6] EFSA.Review of the Séralini et al. (2012) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 September 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J, 2012, 10(10): 2910.

[7] Séralini G E, Mesnage R, Defarge N, et al. Answers to critics: why there is a long term toxicity due to a Roundup tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2013, 53: 476-483.

[8] EFSA. Final review of the Séralini et al. (2012a) publication on a 2-year rodent feeding study with glyphosate formulations and GM maize NK603 as published online on 19 september 2012 in Food and Chemical Toxicology. EFSA J, 2012,10(11): 2986.

[9] Nicole W. A closer look at GE corn findings. Environ Health Perspect, 2012, 120(11): A421.

[10] Sieradzki Z, Mazur M, Kwiatek K, et al. Assessing the possibility of genetically modified DNA transfer from GM feed to broiler, laying hen, pig. Polish Journal of Veterinary Sciences, 2013, 16 (3): 435-441.

[11] Halle I, Flachowsky G. A four-generation feeding study with genetically modified (Bt) maize in laying hens. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 2014, 50 (11): 4221-4231.

[12] Zhang M, Zhuo Q, Tian Y, et al. Long-term toxicity study on transgenic rice with Cry1Ac and sck genes. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2014, 63(1): 76-83.

[13] Robinson C, Holland N, Leloup D, et al. Conflicts of interest at the European Food Safety Authority erode public confidence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2013, 67 (9): 717-720.

[14] Miguel A S. Conflict of interests and evidence base for GM crops food/feed safety research. Nature Biotechnology, 2015, 33 (2): 135-137.

[15] Suzuki H, Mohr U, Kimmerle G. Spontaneous endocrine tumors in Sprague-Dawley rats.Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology,1979, 95(2): 187-196.

[16] Keenan K P, Soper K A, Smith P F, et al. Diet, overfeeding, and moderate dietary restriction in control Sprague-Dawley rats. 1. Effects on spontaneous neoplasms. Toxicol Pathology,1995,23(3):269-286.

[17] Butler D. Rat study sparks GM furore. Nature, 2012, 489(7417): 484.

[18] Sanders D, Kamoun S, Williams B, et al. Letter to the editor. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2013, 53(3): 450-453.

[19] De Souza L, Macedo Oda L. Letter to the editor. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 2013, 53(3): 440.

[20] OECD. OECD guideline for the testing of chemicals 451-carcinogenicity studies.
[2009-12-07]. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9745101e.pdf?expires=1364688505&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=2D4BE09CDFC6AF724AE82892E211DADD.

[21] Nagasawa A, Yano N, Yuzawa K, et al. A 104-week feeding study of genetically modified soybeans in F344 rats. Journal of the Food Hygienic Society of Japan, 2008,49(4): 272-282.

[22] Arjo G, Portero M, Pinol C, et al. Plurality of opinion, scientific discourse and pseudoscience: an in depth analysis of the Séralini et al. study claiming that Roundup (TM) Ready corn or the herbicide Roundup (TM) cause cancer in rats. Transgenic Research, 2013,22(2): 255-267.

[1]	梁晋刚,张旭冬,毕研哲,王颢潜,张秀杰. 转基因抗虫玉米发展现状与展望^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(6): 98-104.
[2]	何伟,祝蕾,刘欣泽,安学丽,万向元. 玉米遗传转化与商业化转基因玉米开发^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(12): 13-23.
[3]	梁振鑫,刘芳,张玮,刘庆友,李力. 抗p185 ^erb ^B2人鼠嵌合抗体ChAb26转基因小鼠乳腺生物反应器的制备与验证 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(8): 40-51.
[4]	王友华,邹婉侬,柳小庆,王兆华,孙国庆. 全球转基因玉米专利信息分析与技术展望 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(12): 83-94.
[5]	杨飞芸,杨天瑞,刘坤,崔爽,王瑞刚,李国婧. 异源表达CiRS基因拟南芥的黄酮代谢及抑菌能力研究 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(11): 22-30.
[6]	曾强,孟秋成,邓力华,李锦江,于江辉,翁绿水,肖国樱. 抗草甘膦、抗螟虫水稻E1C608的鉴定和重要表型特征分析 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(11): 31-38.
[7]	陈秀秀,吴成林,周丽君. 人源抗体制备及临床应用研究进展 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019, 39(10): 90-96.
[8]	徐琳杰,刘培磊,李文龙,孙卓婧,宋贵文. 国际转基因标识制度变动趋势分析及对我国的启示 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(9): 94-98.
[9]	韩明明,罗玉萍. 内源CD133 ⁺细胞示踪小鼠模型的制备和鉴定 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(6): 58-62.
[10]	周天盟,刘旭霞. *论预防原则在欧盟转基因生物监管中的困境与出路 ^——基于意大利Fidenato案的分析**[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(6): 95-102.
[11]	姚民,朱淑华,李佛生,张士彦,唐琳. *异源表达AtCYSa基因烟草的耐盐和抗虫特性分析*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(4): 8-16.
[12]	王嘉祯,姚伦广,王峰,阚云超,罗金萍,黄倩倩,段建平. 家蚕中肠特异启动子P56的克隆及活性分析 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(2): 13-17.
[13]	王友华,蔡晶晶,杨明,张恬,任红梅,邹婉浓,孙国庆. 全球转基因大豆专利信息分析与技术展望[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(2): 116-125.
[14]	崔帅,王作平,于江辉,肖国樱. 转基因水稻BPL9K-2事件特异性检测方法的建立 ^*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2018, 38(11): 32-41.
[15]	刘旭霞, 张楠. 中美转基因作物种植管理制度比较[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2017, 37(8): 119-127.

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed