Please wait a minute...

中国生物工程杂志

CHINA BIOTECHNOLOGY
中国生物工程杂志  2020, Vol. 40 Issue (8): 1-9    DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.2006044
研究报告     
新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)IgM /IgG抗体检测试剂的研制及性能评价
张赛1,向乐1,李林海2,李辉军3,王刚1,钱纯亘4,*()
1 深圳市亚辉龙生物科技股份有限公司 深圳 518116
2 中国人民解放军南部战区总医院 广州 510010
3 华中科技大学同济医学院附属同济医院 武汉 430030
4 华中科技大学生命科学与技术学院 武汉 430074
Development and Performance Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection
ZHANG Sai1,XIANG Le1,LI Lin-hai2,LI Hui-jun3,WANG Gang1,QIAN Chun-gen4,*()
1 Shenzhen YHLO Biotech Co., Ltd., Shenzhen 518116, China
2 General Hospital of Southern Theater Command, Guangzhou 510010, China
3 Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430030, China
4 College of Life Science and Technology, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
 全文: PDF(994 KB)   HTML
摘要:

目的:建立新型冠状病毒(2019 novel coronavirus,2019-nCoV)IgM /IgG胶体金抗体联合检测试剂的制备方法,并对检测试剂的性能指标进行评价。方法: 采用柠檬酸三钠还原法制备胶体金溶液,分别用刺突蛋白(S蛋白)受体结合域(receptor binding domain, RBD)和核衣壳蛋白(nucleocapsid protein, NP)作为标记抗原,硝酸纤维素膜上包被鼠抗人IgM单抗(M线)和鼠抗人IgG单抗(G线),并用二硝基苯酚-牛血清白蛋白(DNP-BSA)和兔抗DNP多抗为独立C线质控系统制备胶体金检测试剂;比较RBD蛋白和NP蛋白临床测试符合率,选取较优抗原制备检测试剂,对试剂交叉、干扰反应性,加速稳定性及临床诊断特异性和灵敏度进行性能评价。结果: RBD蛋白临床测试总符合率 98.48%(389/395);NP蛋白临床测试总符合率89.11%(352/395),RBD蛋白总符合率高于NP蛋白。选用RBD蛋白制备检测试剂盒,与13种常见病原体抗体阳性样本均无交叉反应;样本中的甘油三酯、血红蛋白、胆红素、类风湿因子(RF)、人抗鼠抗体(HAMA)、抗核抗体(ANA)对测试结果无干扰。试剂盒50℃加速破坏6周稳定。临床确诊样本及排除样本测试,IgM灵敏度为78.31%(65/83),特异性为98.90%(721/729);IgG灵敏度为92.77%(77/83),特异性为99.31%(724/729);IgM和IgG联合检测灵敏度为92.77%(77/83),特异性为98.35%(717/729);一致性检验Kappa值为0.883 0,P<0.05。结论: 2019-nCoV IgM/IgG抗体检测试剂(胶体金法)检测性能的特异性和灵敏度高,检测速度快,操作便携,可作为已有的2019-nCoV核酸检测法的补充手段。

关键词: 新型冠状病毒抗体胶体金免疫层析    
Abstract:

Objective: To establish a colloidal gold technique assay for the rapid detection of immunoglobulin M (IgM) and immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibodies against 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) and to evaluate its clinical performance. Methods: The colloidal gold was prepared by trisodium citrate reduction. The receptor binding domain (RBD) of spike protein and nucleocapsid protein (NP) were used as marker antigen. The nitrocellulose membrane was coated with mouse anti human IgM monoclonal antibody and mouse anti human IgG monoclonal antibody, and the detection reagent was prepared by using dinitrophenol-bovine serum albumin (DNP-BSA) and rabbit anti DNP polyclonal antibody as independent quality control. By comparing the clinical coincidence rate of RBD protein and NP protein, the better antigen was selected to prepare the detection reagent, and the performance of cross reactivity, interference reactivity, accelerated stability, specificity and sensitivity of clinical diagnosis were evaluated. Results: The total coincidence rate of RBD protein was 98.48% (389/395), and that of NP protein was 89.11% (352/395). There were no cross reaction with antibody positive samples of 13 common pathogens. Triglyceride, hemoglobin, bilirubin, rheumatoid factor (RF), human anti mouse antibody (HAMA) and antinuclear antibody (ANA) in the samples did not interfere with the test results. The kit was stable after 6 weeks accelerated at 50℃. The sensitivity of IgM was 78.31% (65/83), the specificity was 98.90% (721/729), the sensitivity of IgG was 92.77% (77/83), the specificity was 99.31% (724/729), the sensitivity of IgM and IgG combined detection was 92.77% (77/83), the specificity was 98.35% (717/729), the kappa consistency test had a kappa value of 0.883 0 (P<0.05). Conclusion: The 2019-nCoV IgM/IgG antibody detection reagent (colloidal gold method) has the advantages of high specificity and sensitivity, fast detection speed and portable operation, which can be used as a supplementary method for the existing 2019-nCoV nucleic acid detection method.

Key words: Novel coronavirus    Antibodies    Colloidal gold    Immunochromatography
收稿日期: 2020-06-23 出版日期: 2020-09-10
ZTFLH:  Q819  
通讯作者: 钱纯亘     E-mail: chungen_qian@hust.edu.cn
服务  
把本文推荐给朋友
加入引用管理器
E-mail Alert
RSS
作者相关文章  
张赛
向乐
李林海
李辉军
王刚
钱纯亘

引用本文:

张赛,向乐,李林海,李辉军,王刚,钱纯亘. 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)IgM /IgG抗体检测试剂的研制及性能评价[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(8): 1-9.

ZHANG Sai,XIANG Le,LI Lin-hai,LI Hui-jun,WANG Gang,QIAN Chun-gen. Development and Performance Evaluation of A Rapid IgM-IgG Combined Antibody Test for 2019 Novel Coronavirus Infection. China Biotechnology, 2020, 40(8): 1-9.

链接本文:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/10.13523/j.cb.2006044        https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/CN/Y2020/V40/I8/1

图1  IgM /IgG抗体联合检测试纸条结构图
Z-Average (d.nm) PDI Zeta potential (mV)
胶体金 26.11±0.06 0.06±0.01 -40.40±2.01
NP蛋白偶合物 87.78±0.47 0.24±0.01 -21.63±1.05
RBD蛋白偶合物 33.95±0.52 0.25±0.01 -31.97±0.06
DNP-BSA蛋白偶合物 40.97±0.31 0.23±0.01 -30.93±0.31
表1  胶体金及胶体金偶合物粒径和Zeta电位
图2  胶体金及胶体金偶合物粒径分布图
IgM IgG IgM/IgG联合
NP蛋白 RBD蛋白 NP蛋白 RBD蛋白 NP蛋白 RBD蛋白
灵敏度 62.96%(17/27) 77.78%(21/27) 92.59%(25/27) 92.59%(25/27) 92.59%(25/27) 92.59%(25/27)
特异性 90.22%(332/368) 99.73%(367/368) 96.74%(356/368) 99.18%(365/368) 88.86%(327/368) 98.91%(364/368)
总符合率 88.35%(349/395) 98.23%(388/395) 96.46%(381/395) 98.73%(390/395) 89.11%(352/395) 98.48%(389/395)
表2  NP蛋白与RBD蛋白灵敏度和特异性比较
0周 2周 4周 6周
IgM IgG IgM IgG IgM IgG IgM IgG
质控品1 1 + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++
2 + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++
3 + ++ + ++ + ++ + ++
质控品2 1 +/- + +/- + +/- + +/- +
2 +/- + +/- + +/- + +/- +
3 +/- + +/- + +/- + +/- +
表3  加速稳定性结果
2019-nCoV
IgM IgG
甲型流感病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
乙型流感病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
呼吸道合胞病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
腺病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
肺炎支原体IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
肺炎支原体IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
肺炎衣原体IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
肺炎衣原体IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
EB病毒衣壳抗原IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
EB病毒衣壳抗原IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
巨细胞病毒IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
巨细胞病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
风疹病毒IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
风疹病毒IgM抗体阳性血清 - -
人类免疫缺陷病毒抗体阳性血清 - -
梅毒螺旋体抗体阳性血清 - -
乙型肝炎病毒表面抗体阳性血清 - -
丙型肝炎病毒IgG抗体阳性血清 - -
表4  交叉反应结果
质控品1 质控品2
IgM IgG IgM IgG
甘油三酯 + ++ +/- +
血红蛋白 + ++ +/- +
胆红素 + ++ +/- +
RF + ++ +/- +
HAMA + ++ +/- +
ANA + ++ +/- +
表5  干扰测试结果
IgM IgG IgM/IgG联合
灵敏度 78.31% (65/83) 92.77% (77/83) 92.77% (77/83)
95%CI: 84.93%~97.30%
特异性 98.90% (721/729) 99.31% (724/729) 98.35% (717/729)
95%CI: 97.14%~99.15%
阳性预测值 89.04% (65/73) 93.90% (77/82) 86.52% (77/89)
95%CI: 77.63%~92.83%
阴性预测值 97.56% (721/739) 99.18% (724/730) 99.17% (717/723)
95%CI: 98.20%~99.69%
总符合率 96.80% (786/812) 98.65% (801/812) 97.78% (794/812)
95%CI: 96.52%~98.68%
表6  临床性能统计结果
图3  临床测试图例(上图为阳性样本,下图为阴性样本)
[1] Chen Y, Liu Q, Guo D. Emerging coronaviruses: genome structure, replication, and pathogenesis. J Med Virol, 2020,92(4):1-6.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.v92.1
[2] 国家卫生健康委办公厅, 国家中医药管理局办公室. 新型冠状病毒肺炎诊疗方案(试行第七版).[2020-03-03]. http://www.gov.cn:8080/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/04/content_5486705.htm.
Office of National Health Commission, Office of National Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine. Diagnosis and treatment scheme of new coronavirus pneumonia (Trial 7th edition).[2020-03-03]. http://www.gov.cn:8080/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-03/04/content_5486705.htm.
[3] Lu R, Zhao X, Li J, et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet, 2020,395(10224):565-574.
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30251-8 pmid: 32007145
[4] Paraskevis D, Kostaki E G, Magiorkinis G, et al. Full-genome evolutionary analysis of the novel corona virus (2019-nCoV) rejects the hypothesis of emergence as a result of a recent recombination event. Infection, Genetics and Evolution, 2020,79:104212.
doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2020.104212 pmid: 32004758
[5] Chu D K W, Pan Y, Cheng S M S, et al. Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia. Clin Chem, 2020,66(4):549-555.
doi: 10.1093/clinchem/hvaa029 pmid: 32031583
[6] Corman V M, Landt O, Kaiser M, et al. Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR. Euro Surveill, 2020,25(3):1-8.
[7] An J H, Liao X J, Xiao T Y, et al. Clinical characteristics of the recovered COVID-19 patients with re-detectable positive RNA test. medRxiv preprint. [2020-03-30]. https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.26.20044222.
[8] Broughton J P, Deng X D, Yu G X, et al. CRISPR-Cas12-based detection of SARS-CoV-2. Nature Biotechnology, 2020,38:870-874.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0513-4 pmid: 32300245
[9] 李晖, 李咏茵, 张志高, 等. 2019新型冠状病毒抗体胶体金检测方法的建立与临床性能评价. 中华传染病杂志, [2020-03-03]. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20200221-00101.
Li H, Li Y Y, Zhang Z G, et al. Establishment and clinical performance evaluation of 2019 novel coronavirus antibody colloidal gold detection method. Chin J Infect Dis, [2020-03-03]. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn311365-20200221-00101.
[10] Li Z T, Yi Y X, Luo X M, et al. Development and clinical application of a rapid IgM-IgG combined antibody test for SARS-CoV-2 infection diagnosis. Journal of Medical Virology, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmv.25727.
doi: 10.1002/jmv.26477 pmid: 32880994
[11] 刘雄, 柯跃华, 刘威, 等. 423例新型冠状病毒肺炎患者血清抗体检测结果与临床诊断应用价值研究 . 中华实验和临床病毒学杂志, [2020-03-30]. https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112866-20200313-00064
Liu X, Ke Y H, Liu W, et al. Analysis of the Serum antibody test results and clinical diagnostic value in patients with new coronavirus pneumonia. Chinese J Exp Clin Virol, [2020-03-30].https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112866-20200313-00064
[12] Long Q X, Liu B Z, Deng H J, et al. Antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in patients with COVID-19. Nature Medicine, 2020, https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0897-1.
pmid: 32807938
[13] Okba N M A, Müller M A, Li W T, et al. SARS-CoV-2 specific antibody responses in COVID-19 patients. medRxiv preprint, https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.03.18.20038059.
[14] Ai T, Yang Z, Hou H, et al. Correlation of chest CT and RT-PCR testing in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in China: a report of 1014 cases. Radiology, 2020,26:200642.
[15] Zhou P, Yang X L, Wang X G, et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature, 2020,579:270-273.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2012-7 pmid: 32015507
[16] Jans H, Liu X, Austin L, et al. Dynamic light scattering as a powerful tool for gold nanoparticle bioconjugation and biomolecular binding studies. Analytical Chemistry, 2009,81(22):9425-9432.
doi: 10.1021/ac901822w pmid: 19803497
[17] Hunter R J. Zeta potential in colloid science: principles and applications. London: Academic Press, 1982.
[18] CLSI. EP25-A Evaluation of stability of in vitro diagnostic reagents; Approved Guideline. 2010.[2020-05-20]. https://clsi.org/media/1424/ep25a_sample.pdf.
[19] 谭明凯, 区静怡, 黄颖, 等. 新型冠状病毒3种抗体试剂盒的性能评估及临床应用初探. 中华微生物学和免疫学杂志, 2020,40(4):250-255.
Tan M K, Ou J Y, Huang Y, et al. Performance evaluation and clinical application of three antibody test kits for novel coronavirus. Chin J Microbiol Immunol, 2020,40(4):250-255.
[20] To K K, Tsang O T, Leung W S, et al. Temporal profiles of viral load in posterior oropharyngeal saliva samples and serum antibody responses during infection by SARS-CoV-2: an observational cohort study. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2020,20(5):565-574.
doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30196-1 pmid: 32213337
[21] To K K, Tsang O T, Yip C C, et al. Consistent detection of 2019 novel coronavirus in saliva. Clin Infect Dis, Feb 2020. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa149.
doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa1342 pmid: 32887998
[1] 贠涛,巩玥,谷芃,徐冰冰,李瑾,赵洗尘. 中国与“一带一路”参与国家抗击新冠肺炎疫情的国际科技合作现状与展望[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(7): 110-121.
[2] 陈修月,周文锋,何庆,苏冰,邹亚文. 噬菌体Qβ病毒样颗粒的制备、纯化及鉴定[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(7): 42-49.
[3] 陈文洁,苗先锋. 抗体偶联药物国内研发现状及企业布局分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(6): 105-110.
[4] 许叶春,柳红,李剑峰,沈敬山,蒋华良. 抗新冠肺炎药物研究进展[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(6): 111-118.
[5] 史瑞,严景华. 抗新型冠状病毒单克隆中和抗体药物研发进展*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(6): 129-135.
[6] 张赛,王刚,刘仲明,李辉军,汪大明,钱纯亘. 新型冠状病毒胶体金抗原快速检测试剂的研制及性能评价*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(5): 27-34.
[7] 范月蕾,王跃,王恒哲,李丹丹,毛开云. 新型冠状病毒体外诊断技术研发现状与展望 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(2/3): 150-161.
[8] 原博,王杰文,康广博,黄鹤. 双特异性纳米抗体的研究进展及其应用 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(2/3): 78-88.
[9] 毛开云,李荣,李丹丹,赵若春,范月蕾,江洪波. 全球双特异性抗体药物研发格局分析*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2021, 41(11): 110-118.
[10] 赵妍淑,张金华,宋浩. 工程原核生物和酵母菌中生产单克隆抗体和抗体片段研究进展 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(8): 74-83.
[11] 蔺士新,刘东晨,雷云,熊盛,谢秋玲. TNF-α纳米抗体的筛选、表达及特异性检测 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(7): 15-21.
[12] 杨笑莹,李梦,赵威,唐敏,张志谦. 抗α2δ1/CD3双特异性抗体的制备和功能的初步研究 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(7): 9-14.
[13] 武瑞君,李治非,张鑫,濮润,敖翼,孙燕荣. 新冠病毒抗体药物研发进展及展望分析[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(5): 1-6.
[14] 王猛,宋慧茹,程雨洁,王毅,杨波,胡征. 以核糖体蛋白L7/L12为分子标志物精准检测肺炎链球菌的研究 *[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(4): 34-41.
[15] 杨丽,石晓宇,李文蕾,李剑,徐寒梅. 构建噬菌体展示抗体库过程中电穿孔法的条件优化[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2020, 40(4): 42-48.