|
|
Recent Advances in Spatiotemporal Omics Technology |
Yujia JIANG1,Zehua JING1,Jing FENG1,Xun XU1,2,**() |
1 BGI Research, Hangzhou 310030, China 2 BGI Research, Shenzhen 518083, China |
|
|
Abstract Spatiotemporal omics technology is a collective term for technologies that observe or detect the multi-omics expression and regulatory features of life in tissues or cells in successive temporal and spatial dimensions, which enables analysis of the nature of life phenomena determined by genetic molecules at the subcellular, cellular, tissue, organ, individual, population, and evolutionary levels. Multi-omics mainly include genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics and proteomics. Among them, spatial transcriptomics has been developing rapidly in recent years and is more widely used. Based on the principles, spatiotemporal omics techniques can be categorized into imaging-based techniques and sequencing-based techniques. Imaging-based technologies include spatial in situ hybridization technologies(SISH), such as smFISH, seqFISH and MERFISH, and spatial in situ sequencing technologies(SISS), such as ISS, FISSEQ and STARmap. Sequencing-based technologies include spatial in situ microsection(SISM) technologies such as tomo-seq, Geo-seq and DSP, and spatial in situ barcoding(SISB) technologies such as ST, Stereo-seq and seq-Scope technologies. The performance difference between different technologies is mainly reflected in the number of captured genes, spatial resolution, capture area, etc. Imaging-based technologies generally have higher spatial resolution, which can reach the level of cellular and subcellular resolution. However, because of the physical limitations brought by optical crowding and experimental complexity, the number and types of genes captured by the target are limited and difficult to improve. Sequencing-based technologies use polyT to specifically capture polyA, which enables unbiased capture at the whole transcriptome level and greatly improves the variety and number of captured genes. However, due to the mechanical limitations received from microsection and capture barcode planting, their spatial resolution generally falls short of single-cell resolution and is mostly a multicellular region with a mixture of multiple cells. Currently, benefiting from the nanoscale realization of nucleic acid binding site spacing on the surface of sequencing microarrays, Stereo-seq and seq-Scope have for the first time achieved nucleic acid capture at subcellular resolution and cell segmentation through integration with cellular staining profiles, which can truly achieve spatial single-cell resolution. The rapid development of spatial transcriptome technology has laid the foundation for the development of spatiotemporal multi-omics technology. Based on the existing experimental flow of spatial transcriptome or capture chip, through the transformation of the capture target and the supporting experimental flow, spatial genome, epigenome and proteome technologies have appeared one after another, and are gradually developing towards the ability to detect multiple histologists simultaneously in a single slice. The wide application of spatiotemporal genomics technologies has brought many challenges and targeted solutions for data analysis. Some of the more important current analysis methods include cell segmentation, spatial domain identification, and cell interactions. Significant challenges remain in the future for de-batching and integrative analysis of large amounts of data. The spatial information of nucleic acids and cells provided by spatiotemporal genomics can be constructed to detect macroscopic life activities and identify microscopic regulatory information at subcellular, cellular, tissue, organ, and holistic levels in both temporal and spatial dimensions. This has led to breakthroughs in important life science research areas such as developmental biology, complex diseases, neuroscience, and botany. Here, the development history of spatiotemporal omics technology, the characteristics of technical principles and physical limits are summarized, and the overall analysis process of spatiotemporal omics and classical spatiotemporal algorithms are outlined. The breakthroughs brought by spatiotemporal omics to the fields of developmental biology, complex diseases, neuroscience, and botany are summarized. The challenges of spatiotemporal omics in terms of technology iteration, analytical method development, and experimental design are also presented, as well as the outlook for the future development of spatiotemporal omics.
|
Received: 29 December 2023
Published: 04 February 2024
|
|
|
|
[1] |
Salmond G P C, Fineran P C. A century of the phage: past, present and future. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 2015, 13(12): 777-786.
doi: 10.1038/nrmicro3564
pmid: 26548913
|
|
|
[2] |
Rhie A, Nurk S, Cechova M, et al. The complete sequence of a human Y chromosome. Nature, 2023, 621(7978): 344-354.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06457-y
|
|
|
[3] |
Li G W, Xie X S. Central dogma at the single-molecule level in living cells. Nature, 2011, 475(7356): 308-315.
doi: 10.1038/nature10315
|
|
|
[4] |
Tam V, Patel N, Turcotte M, et al. Benefits and limitations of genome-wide association studies. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2019, 20(8): 467-484.
doi: 10.1038/s41576-019-0127-1
pmid: 31068683
|
|
|
[5] |
Li X M, Wang C Y. From bulk, single-cell to spatial RNA sequencing. International Journal of Oral Science, 2021, 13(1): 36.
doi: 10.1038/s41368-021-00146-0
pmid: 34782601
|
|
|
[6] |
Gawad C, Koh W, Quake S R. Single-cell genome sequencing: current state of the science. Nature Reviews Genetics, 2016, 17(3): 175-188.
doi: 10.1038/nrg.2015.16
pmid: 26806412
|
|
|
[7] |
Bressan D, Battistoni G, Hannon G J. The dawn of spatial omics. Science, 2023, 381(6657): eabq4964.
doi: 10.1126/science.abq4964
|
|
|
[8] |
Moses L, Pachter L. Museum of spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods, 2022, 19(5): 534-546.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01409-2
pmid: 35273392
|
|
|
[9] |
Femino A M, Fay F S, Fogarty K, et al. Visualization of single RNA transcripts in situ. Science, 1998, 280(5363): 585-590.
pmid: 9554849
|
|
|
[10] |
Player A N, Shen L P, Kenny D, et al. Single-copy gene detection using branched DNA (bDNA) in situ hybridization. The Journal of Histochemistry and Cytochemistry, 2001, 49(5): 603-612.
doi: 10.1177/002215540104900507
|
|
|
[11] |
Wang F, Flanagan J, Su N, et al. RNAscope: a novel in situ RNA analysis platform for formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics, 2012, 14(1): 22-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2011.08.002
|
|
|
[12] |
Shah S, Lubeck E, Schwarzkopf M, et al. Single-molecule RNA detection at depth by hybridization chain reaction and tissue hydrogel embedding and clearing. Development, 2016, 143(15): 2862-2867.
doi: 10.1242/dev.138560
pmid: 27342713
|
|
|
[13] |
Wu C L, Simonetti M, Rossell C, et al. RollFISH achieves robust quantification of single-molecule RNA biomarkers in paraffin-embedded tumor tissue samples. Communications Biology, 2018, 1: 209.
doi: 10.1038/s42003-018-0218-0
pmid: 31924875
|
|
|
[14] |
Rouhanifard S H, Mellis I A, Dunagin M, et al. ClampFISH detects individual nucleic acid molecules using click chemistry-based amplification. Nature Biotechnology, 2019, 37: 84-89.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.4286
|
|
|
[15] |
Lubeck E, Cai L. Single-cell systems biology by super-resolution imaging and combinatorial labeling. Nature Methods, 2012, 9(7): 743-748.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2069
pmid: 22660740
|
|
|
[16] |
Eng C H L, Shah S, Thomassie J, et al. Profiling the transcriptome with RNA SPOTs. Nature Methods, 2017, 14(12): 1153-1155.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4500
|
|
|
[17] |
Eng C H L, Lawson M, Zhu Q, et al. Transcriptome-scale super-resolved imaging in tissues by RNA seqFISH. Nature, 2019, 568(7751): 235-239.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1049-y
|
|
|
[18] |
Moffitt J R, Hao J J, Wang G P, et al. High-throughput single-cell gene-expression profiling with multiplexed error-robust fluorescence in situ hybridization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(39): 11046-11051.
|
|
|
[19] |
Wang G P, Moffitt J R, Zhuang X W. Multiplexed imaging of high-density libraries of RNAs with MERFISH and expansion microscopy. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8(1): 4847.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22297-7
pmid: 29555914
|
|
|
[20] |
Wang Y H, Eddison M, Fleishman G, et al. EASI-FISH for thick tissue defines lateral hypothalamus spatio-molecular organization. Cell, 2021, 184(26): 6361-6377, e24.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.11.024
pmid: 34875226
|
|
|
[21] |
Mitra R D, Church G M. In situ localized amplification and contact replication of many individual DNA molecules. Nucleic Acids Research, 1999, 27(24): e34-e39.
doi: 10.1093/nar/27.24.e34
pmid: 10572186
|
|
|
[22] |
Mitra R D, Butty V L, Shendure J, et al. Digital genotyping and haplotyping with polymerase colonies. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2003, 100(10): 5926-5931.
|
|
|
[23] |
Lee J H, Daugharthy E R, Scheiman J, et al. Highly multiplexed subcellular RNA sequencing in situ. Science, 2014, 343(6177): 1360-1363.
doi: 10.1126/science.1250212
|
|
|
[24] |
Ke R Q, Mignardi M, Pacureanu A, et al. In situ sequencing for RNA analysis in preserved tissue and cells. Nature Methods, 2013, 10(9): 857-860.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2563
|
|
|
[25] |
Gyllborg D, Langseth C M, Qian X Y, et al. Hybridization-based in situ sequencing (HybISS) for spatially resolved transcriptomics in human and mouse brain tissue. Nucleic Acids Research, 2020, 48(19): e112.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa792
pmid: 32990747
|
|
|
[26] |
Tang X B, Chen J Y, Zhang X Y, et al. Improved in situ sequencing for high-resolution targeted spatial transcriptomic analysis in tissue sections. Journal of Genetics and Genomics, 2023, 50(9): 652-660.
doi: 10.1016/j.jgg.2023.02.004
|
|
|
[27] |
Wang X, Allen W E, Wright M A, et al. Three-dimensional intact-tissue sequencing of single-cell transcriptional states. Science, 2018, 361(6400): eaat5691.
doi: 10.1126/science.aat5691
|
|
|
[28] |
Alon S, Goodwin D R, Sinha A, et al. Expansion sequencing: spatially precise in situ transcriptomics in intact biological systems. Science, 2021, 371(6528): eaax2656.
doi: 10.1126/science.aax2656
|
|
|
[29] |
Emmert-Buck M R, Bonner R F, Smith P D, et al. Laser capture microdissection. Science, 1996, 274(5289): 998-1001.
doi: 10.1126/science.274.5289.998
pmid: 8875945
|
|
|
[30] |
Junker J P, Noël E S, Guryev V, et al. Genome-wide RNA tomography in the zebrafish embryo. Cell, 2014, 159(3): 662-675.
|
|
|
[31] |
Peng G D, Suo S B, Chen J, et al. Spatial transcriptome for the molecular annotation of lineage fates and cell identity in mid-gastrula mouse embryo. Developmental Cell, 2016, 36(6): 681-697.
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2016.02.020
pmid: 27003939
|
|
|
[32] |
Zhang X D, Hu C S, Huang C, et al. Robust acquisition of spatial transcriptional programs in tissues with immunofluorescence-guided laser capture microdissection. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2022, 10: 853188.
doi: 10.3389/fcell.2022.853188
|
|
|
[33] |
Giolai M, Verweij W, Lister A, et al. Spatially resolved transcriptomics reveals plant host responses to pathogens. Plant Methods, 2019, 15(1): 114.
doi: 10.1186/s13007-019-0498-5
|
|
|
[34] |
Lovatt D, Ruble B K, Lee J, et al. Transcriptome in vivo analysis (TIVA) of spatially defined single cells in live tissue. Nature Methods, 2014, 11(2): 190-196.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2804
pmid: 24412976
|
|
|
[35] |
Honda M, Oki S, Kimura R, et al. High-depth spatial transcriptome analysis by photo-isolation chemistry. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 4416.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24691-8
pmid: 34285220
|
|
|
[36] |
Hu K H, Eichorst J P, McGinnis C S, et al. ZipSeq: barcoding for real-time mapping of single cell transcriptomes. Nature Methods, 2020, 17(8): 833-843.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-0880-2
pmid: 32632238
|
|
|
[37] |
Merritt C R, Ong G T, Church S E, et al. Multiplex digital spatial profiling of proteins and RNA in fixed tissue. Nature Biotechnology, 2020, 38(5): 586-599.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0472-9
pmid: 32393914
|
|
|
[38] |
Ståhl P L, Salmén F, Vickovic S, et al. Visualization and analysis of gene expression in tissue sections by spatial transcriptomics. Science, 2016, 353(6294): 78-82.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2403
pmid: 27365449
|
|
|
[39] |
Rodriques S G, Stickels R R, Goeva A, et al. Slide-seq: a scalable technology for measuring genome-wide expression at high spatial resolution. Science, 2019, 363(6434): 1463-1467.
doi: 10.1126/science.aaw1219
pmid: 30923225
|
|
|
[40] |
Stickels R R, Murray E, Kumar P, et al. Highly sensitive spatial transcriptomics at near-cellular resolution with Slide-seqV2. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(3): 313-319.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-020-0739-1
pmid: 33288904
|
|
|
[41] |
Vickovic S, Eraslan G, Salmén F, et al. High-definition spatial transcriptomics for in situ tissue profiling. Nature Methods, 2019, 16(10): 987-990.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0548-y
pmid: 31501547
|
|
|
[42] |
Liu Y, Yang M Y, Deng Y X, et al. High-spatial-resolution multi-omics sequencing via deterministic barcoding in tissue. Cell, 2020, 183(6): 1665-1681, e18.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.026
pmid: 33188776
|
|
|
[43] |
Chen A, Liao S, Cheng M N, et al. Spatiotemporal transcriptomic atlas of mouse organogenesis using DNA nanoball-patterned arrays. Cell, 2022, 185(10): 1777-1792, e21.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.04.003
pmid: 35512705
|
|
|
[44] |
Cho C S, Xi J Y, Si Y C, et al. Microscopic examination of spatial transcriptome using seq-Scope. Cell, 2021, 184(13): 3559-3572, e22.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.05.010
|
|
|
[45] |
Fu X N, Sun L, Dong R Z, et al. Polony gels enable amplifiable DNA stamping and spatial transcriptomics of chronic pain. Cell, 2022, 185(24): 4621-4633, e17.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.021
pmid: 36368323
|
|
|
[46] |
Schueder F, Bewersdorf J. Omics goes spatial epigenomics. Cell, 2022, 185(23): 4253-4255.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.10.014
pmid: 36368304
|
|
|
[47] |
Takei Y, Yun J N, Zheng S W, et al. Integrated spatial genomics reveals global architecture of single nuclei. Nature, 2021, 590(7845): 344-350.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-03126-2
|
|
|
[48] |
Zhao T T, Chiang Z D, Morriss J W, et al. Spatial genomics enables multi-modal study of clonal heterogeneity in tissues. Nature, 2022, 601(7891): 85-91.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-021-04217-4
|
|
|
[49] |
Cardozo Gizzi A M, Cattoni D I, Fiche J B, et al. Microscopy-based chromosome conformation capture enables simultaneous visualization of genome organization and transcription in intact organisms. Molecular Cell, 2019, 74(1): 212-222, e5.
doi: S1097-2765(19)30011-5
pmid: 30795893
|
|
|
[50] |
Su J H, Zheng P, Kinrot S S, et al. Genome-scale imaging of the 3D organization and transcriptional activity of chromatin. Cell, 2020, 182(6): 1641-1659, e26.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.032
|
|
|
[51] |
Lu T, Ang C E, Zhuang X W. Spatially resolved epigenomic profiling of single cells in complex tissues. Cell, 2022, 185(23): 4448-4464, e17.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.09.035
pmid: 36272405
|
|
|
[52] |
Llorens-Bobadilla E, Zamboni M, Marklund M, et al. Solid-phase capture and profiling of open chromatin by spatial ATAC. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41(8): 1085-1088.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01603-9
pmid: 36604544
|
|
|
[53] |
Deng Y X, Bartosovic M, Kukanja P, et al. Spatial-CUT&Tag: spatially resolved chromatin modification profiling at the cellular level. Science, 2022, 375(6581): 681-686.
doi: 10.1126/science.abg7216
|
|
|
[54] |
Deng Y X, Bartosovic M, Ma S, et al. Spatial profiling of chromatin accessibility in mouse and human tissues. Nature, 2022, 609(7926): 375-383.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05094-1
|
|
|
[55] |
Jiang F Q, Zhou X, Qian Y Y, et al. Simultaneous profiling of spatial gene expression and chromatin accessibility during mouse brain development. Nature Methods, 2023, 20(7): 1048-1057.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01884-1
|
|
|
[56] |
Schulz D, Zanotelli V R T, Fischer J R, et al. Simultaneous multiplexed imaging of mRNA and proteins with subcellular resolution in breast cancer tissue samples by mass cytometry. Cell Systems, 2018, 6(1): 25-36, e5.
doi: S2405-4712(17)30543-4
pmid: 29289569
|
|
|
[57] |
Liu X H, Mao D S, Song Y C, et al. Computer-aided design of reversible hybridization chain reaction (CAD-HCR) enables multiplexed single-cell spatial proteomics imaging. Science Advances, 2022, 8(2): eabk0133.
doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0133
|
|
|
[58] |
Zeng H, Huang J H, Zhou H W, et al. Integrative in situ mapping of single-cell transcriptional states and tissue histopathology in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Nature Neuroscience, 2023, 26(3): 430-446.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01251-x
pmid: 36732642
|
|
|
[59] |
Stoeckius M, Hafemeister C, Stephenson W, et al. Simultaneous epitope and transcriptome measurement in single cells. Nature Methods, 2017, 14(9): 865-868.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4380
pmid: 28759029
|
|
|
[60] |
Liao S, Heng Y, Liu W Q, et al. Integrated spatial transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of fresh frozen tissue based on stereo-seq. bioRxiv, 2023, DOI: 10.1101/2023.04.28.538364.
doi: 10.1101/2023.04.28.538364
|
|
|
[61] |
Ben-Chetrit N, Niu X, Swett A D, et al. Integration of whole transcriptome spatial profiling with protein markers. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41(6): 788-793.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01536-3
pmid: 36593397
|
|
|
[62] |
Liu Y, DiStasio M, Su G, et al. High-plex protein and whole transcriptome co-mapping at cellular resolution with spatial CITE-seq. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41(10): 1405-1409.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-023-01676-0
|
|
|
[63] |
Schmidt U, Weigert M, Broaddus C, et al. Cell detection with star-convex polygons. International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Cham: Springer, 2018: 265-273.
|
|
|
[64] |
Bannon D, Moen E, Schwartz M, et al. DeepCell Kiosk: scaling deep learning-enabled cellular image analysis with Kubernetes. Nature Methods, 2021, 18(1): 43-45.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01023-0
pmid: 33398191
|
|
|
[65] |
Stringer C, Wang T, Michaelos M, et al. Cellpose: a generalist algorithm for cellular segmentation. Nature Methods, 2021, 18(1): 100-106.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-020-01018-x
pmid: 33318659
|
|
|
[66] |
Petukhov V, Xu R J, Soldatov R A, et al. Cell segmentation in imaging-based spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(3): 345-354.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01044-w
|
|
|
[67] |
Park J, Choi W, Tiesmeyer S, et al. Cell segmentation-free inference of cell types from in situ transcriptomics data. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 3545.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23807-4
|
|
|
[68] |
He Y C, Tang X, Huang J H, et al. ClusterMap for multi-scale clustering analysis of spatial gene expression. Nature Communications, 2021, 12(1): 5909.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-26044-x
pmid: 34625546
|
|
|
[69] |
Chen H, Li D, Bar-Joseph Z. SCS: cell segmentation for high-resolution spatial transcriptomics. Nature Methods, 2023, 20(8): 1237-1243.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-023-01939-3
pmid: 37429992
|
|
|
[70] |
Kleshchevnikov V, Shmatko A, Dann E, et al. Cell2location maps fine-grained cell types in spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(5): 661-671.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-01139-4
pmid: 35027729
|
|
|
[71] |
Elosua-Bayes M, Nieto P, Mereu E, et al. SPOTlight: seeded NMF regression to deconvolute spatial transcriptomics spots with single-cell transcriptomes. Nucleic Acids Research, 2021, 49(9): e50.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkab043
pmid: 33544846
|
|
|
[72] |
Biancalani T, Scalia G, Buffoni L, et al. Deep learning and alignment of spatially resolved single-cell transcriptomes with Tangram. Nature Methods, 2021, 18(11): 1352-1362.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01264-7
pmid: 34711971
|
|
|
[73] |
Ma Y, Zhou X. Spatially informed cell-type deconvolution for spatial transcriptomics. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(9): 1349-1359.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01273-7
pmid: 35501392
|
|
|
[74] |
Hu J, Li X J, Coleman K, et al. SpaGCN: integrating gene expression, spatial location and histology to identify spatial domains and spatially variable genes by graph convolutional network. Nature Methods, 2021, 18(11): 1342-1351.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-021-01255-8
pmid: 34711970
|
|
|
[75] |
Dong K N, Zhang S H. Deciphering spatial domains from spatially resolved transcriptomics with an adaptive graph attention auto-encoder. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 1739.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-29439-6
pmid: 35365632
|
|
|
[76] |
Shang L L, Zhou X. Spatially aware dimension reduction for spatial transcriptomics. Nature Communications, 2022, 13(1): 7203.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34879-1
pmid: 36418351
|
|
|
[77] |
Zhao E, Stone M R, Ren X, et al. Spatial transcriptomics at subspot resolution with BayesSpace. Nature Biotechnology, 2021, 39(11): 1375-1384.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-021-00935-2
pmid: 34083791
|
|
|
[78] |
Svensson V, Teichmann S A, Stegle O. SpatialDE: identification of spatially variable genes. Nature Methods, 2018, 15(5): 343-346.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4636
pmid: 29553579
|
|
|
[79] |
Zhu J Q, Sun S Q, Zhou X. SPARK-X: non-parametric modeling enables scalable and robust detection of spatial expression patterns for large spatial transcriptomic studies. Genome Biology, 2021, 22(1): 184.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-021-02404-0
pmid: 34154649
|
|
|
[80] |
Weber L M, Saha A, Datta A, et al. nnSVG for the scalable identification of spatially variable genes using nearest-neighbor Gaussian processes. Nature Communications, 2023, 14(1): 4059.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-023-39748-z
pmid: 37429865
|
|
|
[81] |
DeTomaso D, Yosef N. Hotspot identifies informative gene modules across modalities of single-cell genomics. Cell Systems, 2021, 12(5): 446-456, e9.
doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2021.04.005
pmid: 33951459
|
|
|
[82] |
Cang Z X, Zhao Y X, Almet A A, et al. Screening cell-cell communication in spatial transcriptomics via collective optimal transport. Nature Methods, 2023, 20(2): 218-228.
doi: 10.1038/s41592-022-01728-4
pmid: 36690742
|
|
|
[83] |
Tanevski J, Flores R O R, Gabor A, et al. Explainable multiview framework for dissecting spatial relationships from highly multiplexed data. Genome Biology, 2022, 23(1): 97.
doi: 10.1186/s13059-022-02663-5
pmid: 35422018
|
|
|
[84] |
Jerby-Arnon L, Regev A. DIALOGUE maps multicellular programs in tissue from single-cell or spatial transcriptomics data. Nature Biotechnology, 2022, 40(10): 1467-1477.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01288-0
pmid: 35513526
|
|
|
[85] |
Fischer D S, Schaar A C, Theis F J. Modeling intercellular communication in tissues using spatial graphs of cells. Nature Biotechnology, 2023, 41(3): 332-336.
doi: 10.1038/s41587-022-01467-z
|
|
|
[86] |
He P, Lim K, Sun D W, et al. A human fetal lung cell atlas uncovers proximal-distal gradients of differentiation and key regulators of epithelial fates. Cell, 2022, 185(25): 4841-4860, e25.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2022.11.005
pmid: 36493756
|
|
|
[87] |
Asp M, Giacomello S, Larsson L, et al. A spatiotemporal organ-wide gene expression and cell atlas of the developing human heart. Cell, 2019, 179(7): 1647-1660, e19.
doi: S0092-8674(19)31282-6
pmid: 31835037
|
|
|
[88] |
Garcia-Alonso L, Lorenzi V, Mazzeo C I, et al. Single-cell roadmap of human gonadal development. Nature, 2022, 607(7919): 540-547.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04918-4
|
|
|
[89] |
Ratz M, von Berlin L, Larsson L, et al. Clonal relations in the mouse brain revealed by single-cell and spatial transcriptomics. Nature Neuroscience, 2022, 25(3): 285-294.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01011-x
pmid: 35210624
|
|
|
[90] |
Chen W T, Lu A, Craessaerts K, et al. Spatial transcriptomics and in situ sequencing to study Alzheimer’s disease. Cell, 2020, 182(4): 976-991, e19.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.06.038
|
|
|
[91] |
Wu L, Yan J Y, Bai Y Q, et al. An invasive zone in human liver cancer identified by stereo-seq promotes hepatocyte-tumor cell crosstalk, local immunosuppression and tumor progression. Cell Research, 2023, 33(8): 585-603.
doi: 10.1038/s41422-023-00831-1
|
|
|
[92] |
Wang Y, Liu B, Min Q J, et al. Spatial transcriptomics delineates molecular features and cellular plasticity in lung adenocarcinoma progression. Cell Discovery, 2023, 9(1): 96.
doi: 10.1038/s41421-023-00591-7
pmid: 37723144
|
|
|
[93] |
Hwang W L, Jagadeesh K A, Guo J A, et al. Single-nucleus and spatial transcriptome profiling of pancreatic cancer identifies multicellular dynamics associated with neoadjuvant treatment. Nature Genetics, 2022, 54(8): 1178-1191.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01134-8
pmid: 35902743
|
|
|
[94] |
Chen A, Sun Y D, Lei Y, et al. Single-cell spatial transcriptome reveals cell-type organization in the macaque cortex. Cell, 2023, 186(17): 3726-3743, e24.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.06.009
pmid: 37442136
|
|
|
[95] |
Shi H L, He Y C, Zhou Y M, et al. Spatial atlas of the mouse central nervous system at molecular resolution. Nature, 2023, 622(7983): 552-561.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06569-5
|
|
|
[96] |
Sun Y C, Chen X Y, Fischer S, et al. Integrating barcoded neuroanatomy with spatial transcriptional profiling enables identification of gene correlates of projections. Nature Neuroscience, 2021, 24(6): 873-885.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-021-00842-4
|
|
|
[97] |
Maniatis S, Äijö T, Vickovic S, et al. Spatiotemporal dynamics of molecular pathology in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Science, 2019, 364(6435): 89-93.
doi: 10.1126/science.aav9776
pmid: 30948552
|
|
|
[98] |
Kaufmann M, Schaupp A L, Sun R, et al. Identification of early neurodegenerative pathways in progressive multiple sclerosis. Nature Neuroscience, 2022, 25(7): 944-955.
doi: 10.1038/s41593-022-01097-3
pmid: 35726057
|
|
|
[99] |
Hara T, Chanoch-Myers R, Mathewson N D, et al. Interactions between cancer cells and immune cells drive transitions to mesenchymal-like states in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell, 2021, 39(6): 779-792, e11.
doi: 10.1016/j.ccell.2021.05.002
pmid: 34087162
|
|
|
[100] |
Xia K K, Sun H X, Li J, et al. The single-cell stereo-seq reveals region-specific cell subtypes and transcriptome profiling in Arabidopsis leaves. Developmental Cell, 2022, 57(10): 1299-1310, e4.
doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2022.04.011
|
|
|
[101] |
Du J, Wang Y C, Chen W F, et al. High-resolution anatomical and spatial transcriptome analyses reveal two types of meristematic cell pools within the secondary vascular tissue of poplar stem. Molecular Plant, 2023, 16(5): 809-828.
doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2023.03.005
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|