Please wait a minute...

中国生物工程杂志

China Biotechnology
China Biotechnology  2013, Vol. 33 Issue (6): 138-144    DOI:
    
The Analysis of Cultural Factors in Impeding GMO Communication in China
FAN Jing-qun1, JIA He-peng2, PENG Guang-mang1,3
1. Life Science Communication Center, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China;
2. Department of Communication Graduate Program Manual Cornell University, Ithaca 14853, U.S.A.;
3. School of Arts and Law, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
Download: HTML   PDF(739KB) HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote (RIS)      

Abstract  

In recent years, the communication of genetically modified organism (GMO) has been impeded in China. While science community and government departments try to overcome the barrier by enhancing science popularization efforts, it cannot be neglected that behind the resistance to GMO, there are hidden cultural factors. It identifies three cultural factors that are involved: the holistic view of nature that pursues "harmony between man and nature", anti-intellectualism, and the psychology of the indulgence with traditional agriculture. All three factors are related to traditional Chinese thinking mode of intuitive extrapolation. After tracing historical concepts of heaven and man, it find that the communication of GMO faces the conflict between constructivism natural view and holistic natural view. In fact, the holistic view of nature has been misinterpreted amidst the pervading anti-intellectualism against high technologies to which GMO belongs. Because of the holistic view of nature and "anti-intellectualism", the indulgence with traditional agriculture is very popular in modern China. But it is completely impossible to back to traditional agriculture by questioning GM technologies. In the situation, if we want to overcome the barriers of GMO communication, we need to reconstruct a friendly intellectual environment. While we need to promote GMO by economic benefits, it is also necessary to integrate the technological development into the generally accepted view of nature.



Key wordsGMO      Communication barriers      Cultural factors      Constructivism natural view      Holistic natural view     
Received: 15 April 2013      Published: 25 June 2013
ZTFLH:  G206.3  
Cite this article:

FAN Jing-qun, JIA He-peng, PENG Guang-mang. The Analysis of Cultural Factors in Impeding GMO Communication in China. China Biotechnology, 2013, 33(6): 138-144.

URL:

https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/     OR     https://manu60.magtech.com.cn/biotech/Y2013/V33/I6/138

[1] 陆杨,王毅.大众文化与媒介.上海:上海三联书店,2000.3-11,67-73.
[2] Stuart Hall, Hobson D, Lowe A, et al. Culture, Media, Language. London: Hutchinson, 1980.128-131.
[3] 约翰·费斯克.关键概念——传播与文化研究辞典.北京:新华出版社,2004.62-65.
[4] 田松.推广转基因技术首先不是科学问题感.读书,2010,7:63-64.
[5] 熊志辉. 中国古代"天人合一" 思想对当代人的启示. 城市规划汇刊,2002,5: 5-10.
[6] 季羡林."天人合一"新解.传统文化与现代化,1993,1: 15.
[7] 张岱年. 中国哲学中"天人合一" 思想的剖析.北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),1985,1: 1-8.
[8] 季羡林.关于"天人合一"思想的再思考.中国文化,1994,1: 8-17.
[9] 陈业新. 近些年来关于儒家"天人合一"思想研究述评—— 以" 人与自然"关系的认识为对象.上海交通大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005,2(13):74-81.
[10] 李根蟠. "天人合一"与"三才"理论——为什么要讨论中国经济史上的"天人关系".中国经济史研究,2000,3:1-23.
[11] 陈业新.中国历史时期的环境变迁及其原因初探.江汉论坛,2012,10:63.
[12] 余文涛等.中国的环境保护.北京:科学出版社,1987.106-112.
[13] 冯友兰. 中国哲学史 (上册). 北京: 中华书局,1961. 55.
[14] 余英时.中国思想传统及其现代变迁.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004.276-311.
[15] 饶毅.转基因:警惕"投机"和"反智".农村.农业.农民(A版),2011,10:28.
[16] 杨莹.转基因议题建构过程中的"去科学化"现象.新闻爱好者,2012,1:5-6.
[17] 高宏斌.第八次中国公民科学素养调查结果发布.中国科学基金,2011,1:63.
[18] 斯图尔特.布兰德.地球的法则.北京:中信出版社,2012.139.
[19] 李根蟠.中国农业史上的"多元交汇"——关于中国传统农业特点的再思考.中国经济史研究,1993,1:19.
[20] 郑林.试论中国传统农业的基本特征.古今农业,2002,4:27-33.
[21] 金观涛. 兴盛与危机——论中国社会超稳定结构. 北京: 法律出版社,2011. 322-325.
[22] 李建民.当代中国的人口转变.人口研究,2009,9:51.
[23] Langdon Winner.Autonomous Technology: Technics-out-of-Control as a Theme in Political Thought. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1977.25-27,100.
[24] 梅其君.温纳是技术自主论者吗——兼论温纳对埃吕尔的技术自主性思想的发展.自然辩证法,2007,5:50.
[25] Jacques Ellul.The Technological System. New York: Continuum, 1980.247.

[1] Lin-jie XU,Pei lei LIU,Wen-long LI,Zhuo-jing SUN,Gui-wen SONG. Analysis of the Recent Trends of International Labeling Policies for Genetically Modified Products and the Enlightenment to China’s Labeling Management[J]. China Biotechnology, 2018, 38(9): 94-98.
[2] Tian-meng ZHOU,Xu-xia LIU. The Dilemma and Solution of the Precautionary Principle in EU Regulation of GMO——Based on the Analysis of Case Fidenato[J]. China Biotechnology, 2018, 38(6): 95-102.
[3] SHI Xiao-hua, FENG Yong-li, PANG Jin-hui, HU Rui-fa. Séralini's “GMO Carcinogenic Study”: From the Experimental Method to Conclusions[J]. China Biotechnology, 2015, 35(7): 111-116.
[4] FAN Jing-qun, JIA He-peng. Polarization and Solidification: Difficulties of GMO Popularization and Path Selection[J]. China Biotechnology, 2015, 35(6): 124-130.
[5] HUANG Wen-sheng, DENG Ting-ting, HAN Jian-xun, WU Ya-jun, CHEN Ying. Estimate the Uncertainty on Quantification of GMO by the Fluorescence Real-time PCR Method[J]. China Biotechnology, 2012, 32(01): 49-55.
[6] DENG Han-chao, YIN Chang-cheng, LIU Guo-zhen, LIN Jian-rong, DENG Ping-jian. Progress in Nucleic Acid Detection Techniques for Genetically Modified Organisms[J]. China Biotechnology, 2011, 31(01): 86-95.