|
|
Screening and Structure-activity Relationship Analysis of Anti-tumor Derived Peptides Based on Musca domestica cecropin |
DENG Rui1,2,3,ZENG Jia-li1,2,LU Xue-mei1,2,**() |
1 School of Lif Science and Biopharmaceutics,Guangdong Pharmaceutical University,Guangzhou 510006,China 2 Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Bioactive Substances,Guangzhou 510006,China 3 School of Pharmacy,Guangdong Pharmaceutical University, Guangzhou 510006,China |
|
|
Abstract In order to find more effective, simpler, less toxic, and more stable small peptides, Musca domestica cecropin (Mdc), a housefly antimicrobial peptide cloned in our laboratory, was used to design five derived peptides and analyze the specific structure and anticancer activities of them. Based on the analysis results of Mdc, five peptides derived from the conserved sequence of Mdc were redesigned:M1-6,M1-7,M1-8,M9-21 and M27-39. Bioinformatics tools were used to predict the physical and chemical properties and secondary structure. Proliferation effects of the derived peptides on ten different cancer cell lines and the toxic effects of them on normal cells were determined by MTT assay. The safety of the five polypeptides was verified by hemolysis test and normal cytotoxicity test. Five kinds of derived peptides were designed with Mdc as template, and they all had inhibitory effects on different cancer cells. M1-7, M1-8 and M27-39 showed good activity to several kinds of cancer cells and low hemolytic activity to human erythrocytes. Interestingly, M1-7 had significant inhibitory effect on PC-12 cells, M1-8 had effective biological activity on HepG2 cells, and M27-39 had obvious inhibitory effect on HCT116 cells. The small molecular peptides with corresponding anticancer activity were successfully screened, among which M1-7, M1-8 and M27-39 have obvious specific anticancer activities and may become promising anticancer agents.
|
Received: 17 May 2021
Published: 01 December 2021
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Xue-mei LU
E-mail: luxuemei@gdpu.edu.cn
|
|
|
[1] |
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R L, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: Globocan estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2021, 71(3):209-249.
doi: 10.3322/caac.v71.3
|
|
|
[2] |
Al-Benna S, Shai Y, Jacobsen F, et al. Oncolytic activities of host defense peptides. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2011, 12(11):8027-8051.
doi: 10.3390/ijms12118027
pmid: 22174648
|
|
|
[3] |
Shabalala S, Muller C J F, Louw J, et al. Polyphenols, autophagy and doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Life Sciences, 2017, 180:160-170.
doi: S0024-3205(17)30206-0
pmid: 28478263
|
|
|
[4] |
Zasloff M. Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms: My perspective. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2019, 1117:3-6. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_1.
doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-3588-4_1
|
|
|
[5] |
Patel S, Akhtar N. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs): The quintessential ‘offense and defense’ molecules are more than antimicrobials. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, 2017, 95:1276-1283.
doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.09.042
|
|
|
[6] |
Kardani K, Bolhassani A. Antimicrobial/anticancer peptides: bioactive molecules and therapeutic agents. Immunotherapy, 2021, 13(8):669-684.
doi: 10.2217/imt-2020-0312
|
|
|
[7] |
Tornesello A L, Borrelli A, Buonaguro L, et al. Antimicrobial peptides as anticancer agents: functional properties and biological activities. Molecules, 2020, 25(12):2850.
doi: 10.3390/molecules25122850
|
|
|
[8] |
Otvos L. Host defense peptides and cancer; perspectives on research design and outcomes. Protein and Peptide Letters, 2017, 24(10):879-886.
|
|
|
[9] |
Melvin J A, Lashua L P, Kiedrowski M R, et al. Simultaneous antibiofilm and antiviral activities of an engineered antimicrobial peptide during virus-bacterium coinfection. Msphere, 2016, 1(3):e00083-00016. DOI: 10.1128/msphere.00083-16.
doi: 10.1128/msphere.00083-16
|
|
|
[10] |
Tripathi A K, Kumari T, Tandon A, et al. Selective phenylalanine to proline substitution for improved antimicrobial and anticancer activities of peptides designed on phenylalanine heptad repeat. Acta Biomaterialia, 2017, 57:170-186.
doi: S1742-7061(17)30287-8
pmid: 28483698
|
|
|
[11] |
Jin X B, Mei H F, Li X B, et al. Apoptosis-inducing activity of the antimicrobial peptide cecropin of Musca domestica in human hepatocellular carcinoma cell line BEL-7402 and the possible mechanism. Acta Biochimica et Biophysica Sinica, 2010, 42(4):259-265.
doi: 10.1093/abbs/gmq021
|
|
|
[12] |
Lu X, Shen J, Jin X, et al. Bactericidal activity of Musca domestica cecropin (Mdc) on multidrug-resistant clinical isolate of Escherichia coli. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2012, 95(4):939-945.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-011-3793-2
pmid: 22202966
|
|
|
[13] |
Lu X M, Jin X B, Wang J, et al. Antihepatitis B virus activity of a protein-enriched fraction from housefly (Musca domestica) in a stable HBV-producing cell line. The Scientific World Journal, 2014, 2014:389560.
|
|
|
[14] |
Chu F J, Jin X B, Zhu J Y. Housefly maggots (Musca domestica) protein-enriched fraction/extracts (PE) inhibit lipopolysaccharide-induced atherosclerosis pro-inflammatory responses. Journal of Atherosclerosis and Thrombosis, 2011, 18(4):282-290.
doi: 10.5551/jat.5991
|
|
|
[15] |
Jin X B, Wang Y J, Liang L L, et al. Cecropin suppresses human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cell growth and survival in vivo without side-toxicity. Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, 2014, 15(13):5433-5436.
doi: 10.7314/APJCP.2014.15.13.5433
|
|
|
[16] |
Lu X M, Jin X B, Zhu J Y. Flow cytometry and electron microscopy study of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli treated with mdc-hly. Microscopy and Microanalysis, 2015, 21(2):351-357.
|
|
|
[17] |
Jin X B, Mei H F, Pu Q H, et al. Effects of Musca domestica cecropin on the adhesion and migration of human hepatocellular carcinoma BEL-7402 cells. Biological & Pharmaceutical Bulletin, 2013, 36(6):938-943.
|
|
|
[18] |
Li J, Zhou T, Zhao F T. Inhibitory effect of sodium houttuyfonate on synovial proliferation in vitro in cells from a patient with rheumatoid arthritis. Experimental and Therapeutic Medicine, 2014, 7(6):1639-1642.
doi: 10.3892/etm.2014.1636
|
|
|
[19] |
Fischer D, Li Y X, Ahlemeyer B, et al. In vitro cytotoxicity testing of polycations: influence of polymer structure on cell viability and hemolysis. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(7):1121-1131.
pmid: 12527253
|
|
|
[20] |
Ahn H S, Cho W, Kang S H, et al. Design and synthesis of novel antimicrobial peptides on the basis of α helical domain of Tenecin 1, an insect defensin protein, and structure-activity relationship study. Peptides, 2006, 27(4):640-648.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2005.08.016
|
|
|
[21] |
Wang K R, Zhang B Z, Zhang W, et al. Antitumor effects, cell selectivity and structure-activity relationship of a novel antimicrobial peptide Polybia-MPI. Peptides, 2008, 29(6):963-968.
doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2008.01.015
|
|
|
[22] |
Cha-Molstad H, Yu J E, Feng Z W, et al. p62/SQSTM1/Sequestosome-1 is an N-recognin of the N-end rule pathway which modulates autophagosome biogenesis. Nature Communications, 2017, 8(1):102.
doi: 10.1038/s41467-017-00085-7
pmid: 28740232
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|