|
|
|
| Promotion in ProteinA Chromatography of WLB303 Monoclonal Antibody by Using Dual Flowrate to Load Sample |
| MENG Guo-ji, DENG Yi-xi, LI Le, LUO Hao-hui, YU Yu-gen |
| Shenzhen Main Luck Pharmaceuticals Inc., Shenzhen 518029, China |
|
|
|
Abstract With the advances in cell culture expression levels and production capacity in the last two decades,it is crucial to improve the binding capacity of protein A resin and decrease processing time. Then the dual flowrate loading strategy is proposed. A cubic equation of GE MabSelect dynamic binding capacity(DBC) was created by measuring several DBC values of the retention time with WLB303 mAb. A unique DBC table of GE MabSelect was generated subsequently to design dual flowrate loading strategy. The fastest dual flowrate loading mode was firstly confirmed by using purified WLB303 mAb to practice on a 2.7 ml column. And it was demonstrated to show obvious promotion in process efficiency by using clarified harvest to practice on a 7 ml column.
|
|
Received: 19 November 2015
Published: 26 January 2016
|
|
|
|
|
| [1] Ghose S, Allen M, Hubbard B, et al. Antibody variable region interactions with Protein A: implications for the development of generic purification processes. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2005, 92(6):665-673.
[2] Shukla A A, Thommes J. Recent advances in large-scale production of monoclonal antibodies and related proteins. Trends Biotechnol, 2010, 28(5):253-261.
[3] Vunnum S, Vedantham G, Hubbard B. Process Scale Purification of Antibodies. Hoboken,New Jersey:John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2009.109-110.
[4] Follman D K, Fahrner R L. Factorial screening of antibody purification processes using three chromatography steps without protein A. Journal of Chromatography A, 2004,1024(1-2):79-85.
[5] Ghose S, Hubbard B, Cramer S M. Protein interactions in hydrophobic charge induction chromatography (HCIC). Biotechnology Progress, 2005,21(2):498-508.
[6] Ghose S, Hubbard B, Cramer S M. Evaluation and comparison of alternatives to protein A chromatography: mimetic and hydrophobic charge induction chromatographic stationary phases. Journal of Chromatography A, 2006, 1122(1-2):144-152.
[7] Ghose S, Nagrath D, Hubbard B, et al. Use and optimization of a dual-flowrate loading strategy to maximize throughput in protein-A affinity chromatography. Biotechnology Progress, 2004, 20(3):830-840.
[8] Ghose S, Hubbard B, Cramer S M. Binding capacity differences for antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins on protein A chromatographic materials. Biotechnology & Bioengineering, 2007, 96(4):768-779.
[9] Hahn R, Schlegel R, Jungbauer A. Comparison of protein A affinity sorbents. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci, 2003, 790(1-2):35-51. |
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
| |
Shared |
|
|
|
|
| |
Discussed |
|
|
|
|
