|
|
Evaluation of UPR Response in Yeast by Using UPRE-lac Z as a Reporter Gene |
ZHANG Xiao-mao1,GUO Jing-han1,HONG Jie-fang2,LU Hai-yan1,DING Juan-juan1,ZOU Shao-lan1,***(),FAN Huan3,***() |
1 School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Key Laboratory of Systems Bioengineering, Ministry of Education, Tianjin 300072, China 2 Tianjin R&D Center for Petrochemical Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China 3 Tianjin Animal Science and Veterinary Research Institute, Tianjin 300381, China |
|
|
Abstract Objective: Unfolded Protein Response (UPR) is one of the most important protein quality control mechanisms, the information about UPR with help to optimize heterologous protein synthesis by secretory pathway and cell self protection from inhibitory substances such as acid and ethanol.Methods: The indicating strains, W303- 1A (leu 2::UPRE-lac Z) and An-a (leu 2::UPRE-lac Z), abbreviated as WZ and AZ, respectively, were first constructed by CRISPR/Cas9 technology and using UPRE-lac Z as a reporter.Results: The growth curve test showed that there was no significant difference between two strains and their host ones. The β-galactosidase activity was assayed at 4 h of incubation time after adding four reagents into media as followings, 1 μg/ml tunicamycin, 8%(v/v) ethanol, 0.3%(v/v) acetic acid, 5% (v/v) ethanol + 0.1%(v/v)acetic acid, respectively. The values of strain AZ were 8.2, 26.4, 1.1 and 7.9 times of that of blank control, respectively, while the results of strain WZ were 12.6, 2.4, 1.0 and 1.0 times, respectively. Further β-glucosidase was expressed by YEplac195 vector into strain AZ and WZ cell. The assay results after 24 h cultivation in 2% cellobiose media showed that the β-glucosidase activities were 0.35 and 6.12 U/ml, respectively, and the responding LacZ values were 3.1 and 5.4 times of that of blank control, respectively.Conclusions: There exists significant difference on the UPR response spectrum between two strains, which also implies their divergent direction and strategy of genetic modification. This study lays the foundation of analytical methods for investigating the key limiting factors in cell inhibitor tolerance and heterologous protein expression in order to make better use of yeast ER and UPR pathway engineering.
|
Received: 22 June 2020
Published: 10 November 2020
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Shao-lan ZOU,Huan FAN
E-mail: slzhou@tju.edu.cn;fanhuan1971@163.com
|
|
|
[1] |
Jouhten P, Boruta T, Andrejev S, et al. Yeast metabolic chassis designs for diverse biotechnological products. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:29694.
doi: 10.1038/srep29694
pmid: 27430744
|
|
|
[2] |
Majidian P, Tabatabaei M, Zeinolabedini M, et al. Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for biofuel production. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018,82:3863-3885.
|
|
|
[3] |
Young C L, Robinson A S. Protein folding and secretion: mechanistic insights advancing recombinant protein production in S.cerevisiae. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2014,30:168-177.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.06.018
pmid: 25032908
|
|
|
[4] |
Fidan O, Zhan J. Recent advances in engineering yeast for pharmaceutical protein production. Rsc Adv, 2015,5:86665-86674.
|
|
|
[5] |
Baghban R, Farajnia S, Rajabibazl M, et al. Yeast expression systems: overview and recent advances. Molecular Biotechnology, 2019,61:365-384.
doi: 10.1007/s12033-019-00164-8
pmid: 30805909
|
|
|
[6] |
Davison S A, Haan R, Zyl W H. Exploiting strain diversity and rational engineering strategies to enhance recombinant cellulase secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10602-2.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-020-10602-2
pmid: 33097965
|
|
|
[7] |
R.E.达尔贝, G.范海列主编, 万平, 张彦琼译. 蛋白质定向、转运和转位. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
|
|
|
[7] |
R.E. Dallbey, Editor-in-chief; translated by Wan P, Zhang Y Q. Protein targeting, transport and translocation. Beijing Science Press, 2009.
|
|
|
[8] |
Feizi A, Österlund T, Petranovic D, et al. Genome-scale modeling of the protein secretory machinery in yeast. PLoS One. 2013,8(5):e63284.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063284
pmid: 23667601
|
|
|
[9] |
赵运英, 王頔, 袁凡, 等. 酿酒酵母细胞中内质网应激与未折叠蛋白反应的研究进展. 微生物学杂志, 2017,37(2):98-106.
|
|
|
[9] |
Zhao Y Y, Wang Y, Yuan F, et al. Advances in endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in Saccharomyces cereviscerae. Microbiology, 2017,37(2):98-106.
|
|
|
[10] |
刘宝琴, 王华芹. 内质网应激与未折叠蛋白反应的研究进展. 中华肿瘤防治杂志, 2010,17(11):869-872.
|
|
|
[10] |
Liu B Q, Wang H Q. Endoplasmic reticulum and unfolded protein response. Chin J Cancer Prev Treat, 2010,17(11):869-872.
|
|
|
[11] |
Schröder M. Engineering eukaryotic protein factories. Biotechnol Lett, 2008,30(2):187-196.
doi: 10.1007/s10529-007-9524-1
pmid: 17885737
|
|
|
[12] |
Sheng J Y, Flick H, Feng X Y. Systematic optimization of protein secretory pathways in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increase expression of hepatitis B small antigen. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017,8, doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00875.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.00875
pmid: 29387048
|
|
|
[13] |
Tang H T, Song M H, He Y, et al. Engineering vesicle trafficking improves the extracellular activity and surface display efficiency of cellulases in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Biotechnology for Biofuels, 2017,10:53, doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0738-8.
doi: 10.1186/s13068-017-0738-8
pmid: 28261326
|
|
|
[14] |
Haan R, Rensburg E, Rose S H, et al. Progress and challenges in the engineering of non-cellulolytic microorganisms for consolidated bioprocessing. Curr Opin Biotechnol, 2015,33:32-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2014.10.003
pmid: 25445545
|
|
|
[15] |
De Klerk C, Fosso-Kankeu E, Du Plessis L, et al. Assessment of the viability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in response to synergetic inhibition during bioethanol production. Current Science, 2018,115(6):1124-1132.
|
|
|
[16] |
Davison, Steffi A, Den H, et al. Heterologous expression of cellulase genes in natural Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2016,100(18):8241-8254.
doi: 10.1007/s00253-016-7735-x
pmid: 27470141
|
|
|
[17] |
Kawazoe N, Kimata Y, Izawa S. Acetic acid causes endoplasmic reticulum stress and induces the unfolded protein response in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2017,8:1192. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01192.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01192
pmid: 28702017
|
|
|
[18] |
Navarro-Tapia E, Querol A, Pérez-Torrado R. Membrane fluidification by ethanol stress activates unfolded protein response in yeasts. Microbial Biotechnology, 2018,11(3):465-475.
doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13032
pmid: 29469174
|
|
|
[19] |
Wang G Q, Liu C, Hong J F, et al. Comparison of process configurations for ethanol production from acid- and alkali-pretreated corncob by Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains with and without beta-glucosidase expression. Bioresource Technology, 2013,142:154-161.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.05.033
pmid: 23735797
|
|
|
[20] |
陆海燕, 李佳蔓, 孙思凡, 等. CRISPR-Cas9系统介导的工业酵母营养缺陷型菌株构建. 中国生物工程杂志, 2019,39(10):67-74.
|
|
|
[20] |
Lu H Y, Li J M, Sun S F, et al. Construction of an auxotrophic mutant from an industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain by CRISPR/Cas 9 system. China Biotechnology, 2019,39(10):67-74.
|
|
|
[21] |
安伯格等编著, 霍克克主译. 酵母遗传学方法实验指南.第二版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
|
|
|
[21] |
Amberg D C, et al. compiled, Huo K K, translater-in-chief. Experimental guidelines on yeast genetic methods. 2nd edition. Beijing: Science Press, 2009.
|
|
|
[22] |
Ding J J, Liang G H, Zhang K, et al. Extra metabolic burden by displaying over secreting: growth, fermentation and enzymatic activity in cellobiose of recombinant yeast expressing β-glucosidase. Bioresour Technol, 2018,254:107-114.
doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.12.030
pmid: 29413910
|
|
|
[23] |
Cox J S, Shamu C E, Walter P. Transcriptional induction of genes encoding endoplasmic reticulum resident proteins requires a transmembrane protein kinase. Cell, 1993,73:1197-1206.
doi: 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90648-a
pmid: 8513503
|
|
|
[24] |
Carlo J E, Norville J E, Mali P, et al. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR- Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Research, 2013,41(7):4336-4343.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt135
pmid: 23460208
|
|
|
[25] |
Bao J C, Huang M T, Dina P, et al. Moderate expression of SEC16 increases protein secretion by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2017, 83 (14), Article Number: UNSP e03400-e03416.
doi: 10.1128/AEM.03400-16
pmid: 28476767
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|