|
|
Research Progress on DNA Double-Strand Break Assay |
DAI Han-ying,XU Ke-qian() |
Department of Laboratory Medicine, Xiangya School of Medicine, Central South University, Changsha 410013, China |
|
|
Abstract Different factors affect DNA integrity, which can be divided into endogenous and exogenous factors, these factors can cause different degrees of DNA damage. Among them, DNA double-strand break is the most serious kind of DNA damage, which is characterized by two DNA strands being cut off. If it is not repaired in time, it will cause a series of damage reactions. Serious DNA double strand break can even cause severe consequences such as cell apoptosis and tumor. Therefore, rapid and accurate detection of the degree of DNA double-strand break in cells is helpful to assess DNA integrity, the effects of genetic toxicity in and out of the environment, clinical diagnosis and chemoradiotherapy monitoring. DNA double-strand break detection technology has developed rapidly in recent years. According to the principle, it can be roughly divided into physical or chemical methods, immunofluorescence method and high-throughput sequencing method. These methods detect the physical and chemical characteristics of the products after DNA double-strand break or specific molecular markers, so as to evaluate the degree of DNA double-strand break. The latest research progress, application and advantages and disadvantages of these methods were introduced in order to provide guidance for the future research and clinic of DNA double-strand break detection.
|
Received: 08 May 2020
Published: 10 September 2020
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Ke-qian XU
E-mail: xukeqian@csu.edu.cn
|
|
|
[1] |
Chatterjee N, Walker G C. Mechanisms of DNA damage, repair and mutagenesis. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2017,58(5):235-263.
doi: 10.1002/em.22087
pmid: 28485537
|
|
|
[2] |
Mladenov E, Magin S, Soni A, et al. DNA double-strand-break repair in higher eukaryotes and its role in genomic instability and cancer: cell cycle and proliferation-dependent regulation. Semin Cancer Biol, 2016,37-38:51-64.
pmid: 2133109
|
|
|
[3] |
Keskin H, Storici F. An approach to detect and study DNA double-strand break repair by transcript RNA using a spliced-antisense RNA template. Methods Enzymol, 2018,601:59-70.
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.11.026
pmid: 29523242
|
|
|
[4] |
Lopez-Canovas L, Martinez Benitez M B, Herrera Isidron J A, et al. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis: past, present, and future. Anal Biochem, 2019,573:17-29.
doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2019.02.020
pmid: 30826351
|
|
|
[5] |
Kawashima Y, Yamaguchi N, Teshima R, et al. Detection of DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Genes Cells, 2017,22(1):84-93.
doi: 10.1111/gtc.12457
pmid: 27976495
|
|
|
[6] |
Takiguchi Y, Kariyazono R, Ohta K. Detection of DNA damage-induced DSBs by the contour-clamped homogeneous electric field (CHEF) system in mammalian cells. Methods Mol Biol, 2020,2119:101-109.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-0323-9_9
pmid: 31989518
|
|
|
[7] |
Neoh H M, Tan X E, Sapri H F, et al. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE): a review of the “gold standard” for bacteria typing and current alternatives. Infect Genet Evol, 2019,74:103935.
doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2019.103935
pmid: 31233781
|
|
|
[8] |
Lytsy B, Engstrand L, Gustafsson A, et al. Time to review the gold standard for genotyping vancomycin-resistant enterococci in epidemiology: comparing whole-genome sequencing with PFGE and MLST in three suspected outbreaks in Sweden during 2013-2015. Infect Genet Evol, 2017,54:74-80.
doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2017.06.010
pmid: 28627467
|
|
|
[9] |
Koppen G, Azqueta A, Pourrut B, et al. The next three decades of the comet assay: a report of the 11 th International Comet Assay Workshop . Mutagenesis, 2017,32(3):397-408.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gex002
pmid: 28340065
|
|
|
[10] |
Mondal M, Guo J. Comet-FISH for ultrasensitive strand-specific detection of DNA damage in single cells. Methods Enzymol, 2017,591:83-95.
doi: 10.1016/bs.mie.2017.03.023
pmid: 28645380
|
|
|
[11] |
Ge J, Chow D N, Fessler J L, et al. Micropatterned comet assay enables high throughput and sensitive DNA damage quantification. Mutagenesis, 2015,30(1):11-19.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/geu063
pmid: 25527723
|
|
|
[12] |
Moller P. The comet assay: ready for 30 more years. Mutagenesis, 2018,33(1):1-7.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gex046
pmid: 29325088
|
|
|
[13] |
Goutham V H, Kamalesh M D, Guruprasad P K, et al. A modified fluorimetric neutral filter elution method for analyzing radiation-induced double strand break and repair. Anal Biochem, 2011,414(2):287-293.
doi: 10.1016/j.ab.2011.03.033
pmid: 21453672
|
|
|
[14] |
Pan X, Wang J, Zhang Y, et al. Detection of trace amounts of target DNA from massive background of nucleic acids by using the LM-PCR-based preamplification method. Biotechnol Appl Biochem, 2017,64(6):879-887.
doi: 10.1002/bab.1545
pmid: 27859653
|
|
|
[15] |
Lim J J, Lee J, Kim D H, et al. DNA fragmentation of human sperm can be detected by ligation-mediated real-time polymerase chain reaction. Fertil Steril, 2013,100(6):1564-1571.
doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.08.017
|
|
|
[16] |
Plappert-Helbig U, Libertini S, Frieauff W, et al. Gamma-H2AX immunofluorescence for the detection of tissue-specific genotoxicity in vivo. Environ Mol Mutagen, 2019,60(1):4-16.
doi: 10.1002/em.22238
pmid: 30307065
|
|
|
[17] |
Nelson B C, Wright C W, Ibuki Y, et al. Emerging metrology for high-throughput nanomaterial genotoxicology. Mutagenesis, 2017,32(1):215-232.
doi: 10.1093/mutage/gew037
pmid: 27565834
|
|
|
[18] |
Lee Y, Wang Q, Shuryak I, et al. Development of a high-throughput gamma-H2AX assay based on imaging flow cytometry. Radiat Oncol, 2019,14(1):150.
doi: 10.1186/s13014-019-1344-7
pmid: 31438980
|
|
|
[19] |
Turinetto V, Giachino C. Multiple facets of histone variant H2AX: a DNA double-strand-break marker with several biological functions. Nucleic Acids Res, 2015,43(5):2489-2498.
doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv061
pmid: 25712102
|
|
|
[20] |
Luczak M W, Zhitkovich A. Monoubiquitinated gamma-H2AX: abundant product and specific biomarker for non-apoptotic DNA double-strand breaks. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 2018,355:238-246.
doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.07.007
pmid: 30006243
|
|
|
[21] |
Crowley L C, Marfell B J, Waterhouse N J, et al. Detection of DNA fragmentation in apoptotic cells by TUNEL. Cold Spring Harb Protoc, 2016,2016(10):900-904.
|
|
|
[22] |
Stubenhaus B, Pellettieri J. Detection of apoptotic cells in planarians by whole-mount TUNEL. Methods Mol Biol, 2018,1774:435-444.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7802-1_16
pmid: 29916169
|
|
|
[23] |
Clouaire T, Rocher V, Lashgari A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of histone modifications at DNA double-strand breaks deciphers repair pathway chromatin signatures. Mol Cell, 2018,72(2):250-262.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.08.020
pmid: 30270107
|
|
|
[24] |
Lengert N, Mirsch J, Weimer R N, et al. AutoFoci, an automated high-throughput foci detection approach for analyzing low-dose DNA double-strand break repair. Sci Rep, 2018,8(1):17282.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-35660-5
pmid: 30470760
|
|
|
[25] |
Vignard J, Mirey G, Salles B. Ionizing-radiation induced DNA double-strand breaks: a direct and indirect lighting up. Radiother Oncol, 2013,108(3):362-369.
doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2013.06.013
|
|
|
[26] |
Crosetto N, Mitra A, Silva M J, et al. Nucleotide-resolution DNA double-strand break mapping by next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods, 2013,10(4):361-365.
|
|
|
[27] |
Yan W X, Mirzazadeh R, Garnerone S, et al. BLISS is a versatile and quantitative method for genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks. Nat Commun, 2017,8:15058.
doi: 10.1038/ncomms15058
pmid: 28497783
|
|
|
[28] |
Lensing S V, Marsico G, Hänsel-Hertsch R, et al. DSBCapture: in situ capture and sequencing of DNA breaks. Nat Method, 2016,13(10):855-857.
doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3960
|
|
|
[29] |
Canela A, Sridharan S, Sciascia N, et al. DNA breaks and end resection measured genome-wide by end sequencing. Mol Cell, 2016,63(5):898-911.
doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.06.034
pmid: 27477910
|
|
|
[30] |
Mirzazadeh R, Kallas T, Bienko M, et al. Genome-wide profiling of DNA double-strand breaks by the BLESS and BLISS methods. Methods Mol Biol, 2018,1672:167-194.
doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7306-4_14
pmid: 29043625
|
|
|
[31] |
Shi L, Tang X, Tang G. GUIDE-seq to detect genome-wide double-stranded breaks in plants. Trends Plant Sci, 2016,21(10):815-818.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2016.08.005
pmid: 27593568
|
|
|
[32] |
Zhu L J, Lawrence M, Gupta A, et al. GUIDEseq: a bioconductor package to analyze GUIDE-Seq datasets for CRISPR-Cas nucleases. BMC Genomics, 2017,18(1):379.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-017-3746-y
pmid: 28506212
|
|
|
[33] |
Wang X, Wang Y, Wu X, et al. Unbiased detection of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas9 and TALENs using integrase-defective lentiviral vectors. Nat Biotechnol, 2015,33:175-178.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3127
pmid: 25599175
|
|
|
[34] |
Frock R L, Hu J, Meyers R M, et al. Genome-wide detection of DNA double-stranded breaks induced by engineered nucleases. Nat Biotechnol, 2015,33(2):179-186.
doi: 10.1038/nbt.3101
pmid: 25503383
|
|
|
[35] |
Hu J, Meyers R M, Dong J, et al. Detecting DNA double-stranded breaks in mammalian genomes by linear amplification-mediated high-throughput genome-wide translocation sequencing. Nat Protoc, 2016,11(5):853-871.
doi: 10.1038/nprot.2016.043
pmid: 27031497
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|