WIND转录因子在植物响应伤口胁迫和器官生长发育中的研究进展*

侯思佳,张倩倩,孙振美,陈静,孟剑桥,梁丹,邬荣领,郭允倩

中国生物工程杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 85-92.

PDF(1213 KB)
PDF(1213 KB)
中国生物工程杂志 ›› 2022, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (4) : 85-92. DOI: 10.13523/j.cb.2109021
综述

WIND转录因子在植物响应伤口胁迫和器官生长发育中的研究进展*

作者信息 +

Research Progress of WIND Transcription Factor Responsing to Wound Stress and Organ Growth in Plants

Author information +
文章历史 +

摘要

伤口诱导的去分化因子(WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION,WIND)是AP2/ERF家族成员之一。植物AP2/ERF (APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR)是一个庞大的转录因子基因家族,存在于所有的植物中。目前大部分关于WIND转录因子的研究都局限在模式植物拟南芥中,在其他植物中鲜有研究。总结了近年来WIND基因在植物伤口信号响应、愈伤组织形成、植物生长和代谢及表观遗传调控中的作用,为后续进一步探究该基因的功能及其应用提供理论基础。

Abstract

Wound induced dedifferentiation(WIND) is one of the members of the APETALA2/ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR (AP2/ERF), a large transcription factor gene family, which exists in all plants. Currently, most of the researches of WIND transcription factor focus on the Arabidopsis thaliana, but there are few studies on other plants. As a summary of the researches in recent years on the roles of WIND gene in plant wound signal response, the formation of callus, plant growth and metabolism, and epigenetic regulation, the present review is expected to provide a theoretical basis for further research on the function and application of WIND gene.

关键词

AP2/ERF基因家族 / 转录因子 / WIND / 生物学功能

Key words

AP2/ERF gene family / Transcription factor / WIND / Biological functions

引用本文

导出引用
侯思佳, 张倩倩, 孙振美, . WIND转录因子在植物响应伤口胁迫和器官生长发育中的研究进展*[J]. 中国生物工程杂志, 2022, 42(4): 85-92 https://doi.org/10.13523/j.cb.2109021
Si-jia HOU, Qian-qian ZHANG, Zhen-mei SUN, et al. Research Progress of WIND Transcription Factor Responsing to Wound Stress and Organ Growth in Plants[J]. China Biotechnology, 2022, 42(4): 85-92 https://doi.org/10.13523/j.cb.2109021
中图分类号: Q819   

参考文献

[1]
Ikeuchi M, Ogawa Y, Iwase A, et al. Plant regeneration: cellular origins and molecular mechanisms. Development (Cambridge, England), 2016, 143(9): 1442-1451.
[2]
Thorpe T A. History of plant tissue culture. Molecular Biotechnology, 2007, 37(2): 169-180.
[3]
Birnbaum K D, Alvarado A S. Slicing across kingdoms: regeneration in plants and animals. Cell, 2008, 132(4): 697-710.
Multicellular organisms possessing relatively long life spans are subjected to diverse, constant, and often intense intrinsic and extrinsic challenges to their survival. Animal and plant tissues wear out as part of normal physiological functions and can be lost to predators, disease, and injury. Both kingdoms survive this wide variety of insults by strategies that include the maintenance of adult stem cells or the induction of stem cell potential in differentiated cells. Repatterning mechanisms often deploy embryonic genes, but the question remains in both plants and animals whether regeneration invokes embryogenesis, generic patterning mechanisms, or unique circuitry comprised of well-established patterning genes.
[4]
Tanaka E M, Reddien P W. The cellular basis for animal regeneration. Developmental Cell, 2011, 21(1): 172-185.
The ability of animals to regenerate missing parts is a dramatic and poorly understood aspect of biology. The sources of new cells for these regenerative phenomena have been sought for decades. Recent advances involving cell fate tracking in complex tissues have shed new light on the cellular underpinnings of regeneration in Hydra, planarians, zebrafish, Xenopus, and Axolotl. Planarians accomplish regeneration with use of adult pluripotent stem cells, whereas several vertebrates utilize a collection of lineage-restricted progenitors from different tissues. Together, an array of cellular strategies-from pluripotent stem cells to tissue-specific stem cells and dedifferentiation-are utilized for regeneration.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[5]
Skoog F, Miller C O. Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 1957, 11: 118-130.
[6]
Valvekens D, van Montagu M, van Lijsebettens M. Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana root explants by using kanamycin selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1988, 85(15): 5536-5540.
[7]
Che P, Lall S, Howell S H. Developmental steps in acquiring competence for shoot development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Planta, 2007, 226(5): 1183-1194.
[8]
Atta R, Laurens L, Boucheron-Dubuisson E, et al. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology, 2009, 57(4): 626-644.
[9]
Sugimoto K, Jiao Y L, Meyerowitz E M. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Developmental Cell, 2010, 18(3): 463-471.
Unlike most animal cells, plant cells can easily regenerate new tissues from a wide variety of organs when properly cultured. The common elements that provide varied plant cells with their remarkable regeneration ability are still largely unknown. Here we describe the initial process of Arabidopsis in vitro regeneration, where a pluripotent cell mass termed callus is induced. We demonstrate that callus resembles the tip of a root meristem, even if it is derived from aerial organs such as petals, which clearly shows that callus formation is not a simple reprogramming process backward to an undifferentiated state as widely believed. Furthermore, callus formation in roots, cotyledons, and petals is blocked in mutant plants incapable of lateral root initiation. It thus appears that the ectopic activation of a lateral root development program is a common mechanism in callus formation from multiple organs.Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[10]
张麒, 陈静, 李俐, 等. 植物AP2/ERF转录因子家族的研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2018, 34(8): 1-7.
摘要
作为植物最大转录因子家族之一,AP2/ERF转录因子广泛存在于植物中,并因其在基因育种等方面具有重要作用而倍受关注。AP2/ERF转录因子家族成员至少含有一段60个左右氨基酸构成的AP2保守结构域,根据结构域的数量和识别序列的不同可以将其分为AP2、ERF、DREB、RAV和Soloist 5个亚家族,且在拟南芥、水稻、玉米和番茄等植物中,AP2/ERF转录因子及其各个亚家族成员的数量各不相同。研究发现,AP2/ERF转录因子可通过响应乙烯、细胞分裂素和生长素的调节从而直接或间接参与种子发育过程、花和果实等器官的形态建成等植物发育的多个进程;除了初生代谢,AP2/ERF转录因子还在植物次生代谢尤其是在调控药用植物主要药用活性成分(如青蒿素、紫杉醇和木质素)合成方面效果显著。同时,有报道称拟南芥AP2/ERF基因具有正向调节抗灰霉病的功能,一些AP2/ERF基因也被报道在植物应对高盐、干旱、缺氧、低温等非生物胁迫方面具重要功能;另外,AP2/ERF类转录因子还参与了乙烯等介导的非生物信号传导。介绍AP2/ERF转录因子的结构分类特征、在不同植物中的数量分布,并阐述其在植物发育、次生代谢、生物与非生物胁迫和信号传导等方面的研究进展,以期为培育出兼具高产、抗病的实用型转基因作物提供理论依据。
Zhang Q, Chen J, Li L, et al. Research progress on plant AP2/ERF transcription factor family. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2018, 34(8): 1-7.
[11]
孙滨, 占小登, 曹立勇, 等. 水稻AP2/ERF转录因子的研究进展. 农业生物技术学报, 2017, 25(11): 1860-1869.
Sun B, Zhan X D, Cao L Y, et al. Research progress of AP2/ERF transcription factor in rice(Oryza sativa). Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2017, 25(11): 1860-1869.
[12]
赵金玲, 姚文静, 王升级, 等. 杨树AP2/ERF转录因子家族生物信息学分析. 东北林业大学学报, 2015, 43(10): 21-29.
Zhao J L, Yao W J, Wang S J, et al. AP2/ERF gene family in Populus trichocarpa by bioinformatics. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2015, 43(10): 21-29.
[13]
Sakuma Y, Liu Q, Dubouzet J G, et al. DNA-binding specificity of the ERF/AP2 domain of Arabidopsis DREBs, transcription factors involved in dehydration- and cold-inducible gene expression. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 2002, 290(3): 998-1009.
DRE/CRT is a cis-acting element that is involved in gene expression responsive to drought and low-temperature stress in higher plants. DREB1A/CBF3 and DREB2A are transcription factors that specifically bind to DRE/CRT in Arabidopsis. We precisely analyzed the DNA-binding specificity of DREBs. Both DREBs specifically bound to six nucleotides (A/GCCGAC) of DRE. However, these proteins had different binding specificities to the second or third nucleotides of DRE. Gel mobility shift assay using mutant DREB proteins showed that the two amino acids, valine and glutamic acid conserved in the ERF/AP2 domains, especially valine, have important roles in DNA-binding specificity. In the Arabidopsis genome, 145 DREB/ERF-related proteins are encoded. These proteins were classified into five groups-AP-2 subfamily, RAV subfamily, DREB subfamily, ERF subfamily, and others. The DREB subfamily included three novel DREB1A- and six DREB2A-related proteins. We analyzed expression of novel genes for these proteins and discuss their roles in stress-responsive gene expression.
[14]
Heyman J, Canher B, Bisht A, et al. Emerging role of the plant ERF transcription factors in coordinating wound defense responses and repair. Journal of Cell Science, 2018, 131(2): jcs208215.
[15]
Rashid M, He G Y, Yang G X, et al. AP2/ERF transcription factor in rice: genome-wide canvas and syntenic relationships between monocots and eudicots. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online, 2012, 8: 321-355.
[16]
Elliott R C, Betzner A S, Huttner E, et al. AINTEGUMENTA, an APETALA2-like gene of Arabidopsis with pleiotropic roles in ovule development and floral organ growth. The Plant Cell, 1996, 8(2): 155-168.
[17]
Boutilier K, Offringa R, Sharma V K, et al. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. The Plant Cell, 2002, 14(8): 1737-1749.
[18]
Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. A novel Cis-acting element in an Arabidopsis gene is involved in responsiveness to drought, low-temperature, or high-salt stress. The Plant Cell, 1994, 6(2): 251-264.
[19]
Thomashow M F. PLANT COLD ACCLIMATION: freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology, 1999, 50: 571-599.
Many plants increase in freezing tolerance upon exposure to low nonfreezing temperatures, a phenomenon known as cold acclimation. In this review, recent advances in determining the nature and function of genes with roles in freezing tolerance and the mechanisms involved in low temperature gene regulation and signal transduction are described. One of the important conclusions to emerge from these studies is that cold acclimation includes the expression of certain cold-induced genes that function to stabilize membranes against freeze-induced injury. In addition, a family of Arabidopsis transcription factors, the CBF/DREB1 proteins, have been identified that control the expression of a regulon of cold-induced genes that increase plant freezing tolerance. These results along with many of the others summarized here further our understanding of the basic mechanisms that plants have evolved to survive freezing temperatures. In addition, the findings have potential practical applications as freezing temperatures are a major factor limiting the geographical locations suitable for growing crop and horticultural plants and periodically account for significant losses in plant productivity.
[20]
Hao D Y, Ohme-Takagi M, Sarai A. Unique mode of GCC box recognition by the DNA-binding domain of ethylene-responsive element-binding factor (ERF domain) in plant. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1998, 273(41): 26857-26861.
Ethylene-responsive element-binding proteins (EREBPs)have novel DNA-binding domains (ERF domains), which are widely conserved in plants, and interact specifically with sequences containing AGCCGCC motifs (GCC box). Deletion experiments show that some flanking region at the N terminus of the conserved 59-amino acid ERF domain is required for stable binding to the GCC box. Three ERF domain-containing fragments of EREBP2, EREBP4, and AtERF1 from tobacco and Arabidopsis, bind to the sequence containing the GCC box with a high binding affinity in the pM range. The high affinity binding is conferred by a monomeric ERF domain fragment, and DNA truncation experiments show that only 11-base pair DNA containing the GCC box is sufficient for stable ERF domain interaction. Systematic DNA mutation analyses demonstrate that the specific amino acid contacts are confined within the 6-base pair GCCGCC region of the GCC box, and the first G, the fourth G, and the sixth C exhibit highest binding specificity common in all three ERF domain-containing fragments studied. Other bases within the GCC box exhibit modulated binding specificity varying from protein to protein, implying that these positions are important for differential binding by different EREBPs. The conserved N-terminal half is likely responsible for formation of a stable complex with the GCC box and the divergent C-terminal half for modulating the specificity.
[21]
Alonso J M, Stepanova A N, Leisse T J, et al. Genome-wide insertional mutagenesis of Arabidopsis thaliana. Science, 2003, 301(5633): 653-657.
Over 225,000 independent Agrobacterium transferred DNA (T-DNA) insertion events in the genome of the reference plant Arabidopsis thaliana have been created that represent near saturation of the gene space. The precise locations were determined for more than 88,000 T-DNA insertions, which resulted in the identification of mutations in more than 21,700 of the approximately 29,454 predicted Arabidopsis genes. Genome-wide analysis of the distribution of integration events revealed the existence of a large integration site bias at both the chromosome and gene levels. Insertion mutations were identified in genes that are regulated in response to the plant hormone ethylene.
[22]
HU Y X, WANG Y H, LIU X F, et al. Arabidopsis RAV 1 is down-regulated by brassinosteroid and may act as a negative regulator during plant development. Cell Research, 2004, 14 (1): 8-15.
[23]
Sohn K H, Lee S C, Jung H W, et al. Expression and functional roles of the pepper pathogen-induced transcription factor RAV 1 in bacterial disease resistance, and drought and salt stress tolerance. Plant Molecular Biology, 2006, 61(6): 897-915.
[24]
Lin R C, Park H J, Wang H Y. Role of Arabidopsis RAP2.4 in regulating light- and ethylene-mediated developmental processes and drought stress tolerance. Molecular Plant, 2008, 1(1): 42-57.
[25]
Okamuro J K, Caster B, Villarroel R, et al. The AP2 domain of APETALA2 defines a large new family of DNA binding proteins in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1997, 94(13): 7076-7081.
[26]
Iwase A, Ohme-Takagi M, Sugimoto K. WIND1: a key molecular switch for plant cell dedifferentiation. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2011, 6(12): 1943-1945.
[27]
Iwase A, Harashima H, Ikeuchi M, et al. WIND 1 promotes shoot regeneration through transcriptional activation of ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(1): 54-69.
[28]
Zhou C, Guo J S, Feng Z H, et al. Molecular characterization of a novel AP 2 transcription factor ThWIND1-L from Thellungiella halophila. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC), 2012, 110(3): 423-433.
[29]
Iwase A, Mitsuda N, Koyama T, et al. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND 1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Current Biology, 2011, 21(6): 508-514.
[30]
Müller B, Sheen J. Cytokinin and auxin interaction in root stem-cell specification during early embryogenesis. Nature, 2008, 453 (7198): 1094-1097.
[31]
Sheng L H, Hu X M, Du Y J, et al. Non-canonical WOX11-mediated root branching contributes to plasticity in Arabidopsis root system architecture. Development (Cambridge, England), 2017, 144(17): 3126-3133.
[32]
Liu J C, Sheng L H, Xu Y Q, et al. WOX11 and 12 are involved in the first-step cell fate transition during de novo root organogenesis in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2014, 26(3): 1081-1093.
[33]
Iwase A, Mita K, Nonaka S, et al. WIND1-based acquisition of regeneration competency in Arabidopsis and rapeseed. Journal of Plant Research, 2015, 128(3): 389-397.
[34]
Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Rymen B, et al. PRC 2 represses dedifferentiation of mature somatic cells in Arabidopsis. Nature Plants, 2015, 1(7): 15089.
[35]
Bouyer D, Roudier F, Heese M, et al. Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition[J]PLoS Genet, 2011, 7(3): e1002014.
[36]
Druege U, Franken P, Hajirezaei M R. Plant hormone homeostasis, signaling, and function during adventitious root formation in cuttings. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016, 7: 381.
Adventitious root (AR) formation in cuttings is a multiphase developmental process, resulting from wounding at the cutting site and isolation from the resource and signal network of the whole plant. Though, promotive effects of auxins are widely used for clonal plant propagation, the regulation and function of plant hormones and their intricate signaling networks during AR formation in cuttings are poorly understood. In this focused review, we discuss our recent publications on the involvement of polar auxin transport (PAT) and transcriptional regulation of auxin and ethylene action during AR formation in petunia cuttings in a broad context. Integrating new findings on cuttings of other plant species and general models on plant hormone networks, a model on the regulation and function of auxin, ethylene, and jasmonate in AR formation of cuttings is presented. PAT and cutting off from the basipetal auxin drain are considered as initial principles generating early accumulation of IAA in the rooting zone. This is expected to trigger a self-regulatory process of auxin canalization and maximization to responding target cells, there inducing the program of AR formation. Regulation of auxin homeostasis via auxin influx and efflux carriers, GH3 proteins and peroxidases, of flavonoid metabolism, and of auxin signaling via AUX/IAA proteins, TOPLESS, ARFs, and SAUR-like proteins are postulated as key processes determining the different phases of AR formation. NO and H2O2 mediate auxin signaling via the cGMP and MAPK cascades. Transcription factors of the GRAS-, AP2/ERF-, and WOX-families link auxin signaling to cell fate specification. Cyclin-mediated governing of the cell cycle, modifications of sugar metabolism and microtubule and cell wall remodeling are considered as important implementation processes of auxin function. Induced by the initial wounding and other abiotic stress factors, up-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis, and signaling via ERFs and early accumulation of jasmonic acid stimulate AR formation, while both pathways are linked to auxin. Future research on the function of candidate genes should consider their tissue-specific role and regulation by environmental factors. Furthermore, the whole cutting should be regarded as a system of physiological units with diverse functions specifically responding to the environment and determining the rooting response.
[37]
Ahkami A H, Lischewski S, Haensch K T, et al. Molecular physiology of adventitious root formation in Petunia hybrida cuttings: involvement of wound response and primary metabolism. The New Phytologist, 2009, 181(3): 613-625.
[38]
Iwase A, Ishii H, Aoyagi H, et al. Comparative analyses of the gene expression profiles of Arabidopsis intact plant and cultured cells. Biotechnology Letters, 2005, 27(15): 1097-1103.
[39]
Iwase A, Mitsuda N, Ikeuchi M, et al. Arabidopsis WIND 1 induces callus formation in rapeseed, tomato, and tobacco. Plant Signaling & Behavior, 2013, 8(12): e27432.
[40]
Stappenbeck T S, Miyoshi H. The role of stromal stem cells in tissue regeneration and wound repair. Science, 2009, 324(5935): 1666-1669.
The process of wound repair in epithelium-lined organs of mammals is complex and is influenced by numerous secreted factors including cytokines, growth factors, and chemokines. However, the cellular organizers of this process are still not understood. Recent studies of tissue regeneration in organisms with simpler development have uncovered details about the activity of stem cells in the mesenchyme (the blastema) during this process. These blastemal cells are well positioned to interpret cues from the environment and to execute decisions about the direction of wound repair. In mammalian wounds, stromal stem cells appear to be positioned to perform functions similar to those of blastemal cells, including communication with both the overlying epithelium and the inflammatory cells in the mesenchyme.
[41]
Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Rymen B, et al. Wounding triggers callus formation via dynamic hormonal and transcriptional changes. Plant Physiology, 2017, 175(3): 1158-1174.
Wounding is a primary trigger of organ regeneration, but how wound stress reactivates cell proliferation and promotes cellular reprogramming remains elusive. In this study, we combined transcriptome analysis with quantitative hormonal analysis to investigate how wounding induces callus formation in Arabidopsis (). Our time course RNA-seq analysis revealed that wounding induces dynamic transcriptional changes, starting from rapid stress responses followed by the activation of metabolic processes and protein synthesis and subsequent activation of cell cycle regulators. Gene ontology analyses further uncovered that wounding modifies the expression of hormone biosynthesis and response genes, and quantitative analysis of endogenous plant hormones revealed accumulation of cytokinin prior to callus formation. Mutants defective in cytokinin synthesis and signaling display reduced efficiency in callus formation, indicating that de novo synthesis of cytokinin is critical for wound-induced callus formation. We further demonstrate that type-B ARABIDOPSIS RESPONSE REGULATOR-mediated cytokinin signaling regulates the expression of () and that mutations in and its homologs and cause defects in callus formation. In addition to these hormone-mediated changes, our transcriptome data uncovered that wounding activates multiple developmental regulators, and we found novel roles of ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR 115 and PLETHORA3 (PLT3), PLT5, and PLT7 in callus generation. All together, these results provide novel mechanistic insights into how wounding reactivates cell proliferation during callus formation.© 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All Rights Reserved.
[42]
Ozawa S, Yasutani I, Fukuda H, et al. Organogenic responses in tissue culture of srd mutants of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development (Cambridge, England), 1998, 125(1): 135-142.
[43]
Che P, Gingerich D J, Lall S, et al. Global and hormone-induced gene expression changes during shoot development in Arabidopsis. The Plant Cell, 2002, 14(11): 2771-2785.
[44]
Gallois J L, Nora F R, Mizukami Y, et al. WUSCHEL induces shoot stem cell activity and developmental plasticity in the root meristem. Genes & Development, 2004, 18(4): 375-380.
[45]
Gordon S P, Heisler M G, Reddy G V, et al. Pattern formation during de novo assembly of the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Development (Cambridge, England), 2007, 134(19): 3539-3548.
[46]
Meng W J, Cheng Z J, Sang Y L, et al. Type-B Arabidopsis RESPONSE REGULATORs specify the shoot stem cell niche by dual regulation of WUSCHEL. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(6): 1357-1372.
[47]
Wang J, Tian C H, Zhang C, et al. Cytokinin signaling activates WUSCHEL expression during axillary meristem initiation. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(6): 1373-1387.
The homeodomain transcription factor WUSCHEL (WUS) defines the shoot stem cell niche, but the mechanisms underlying the establishment of expression remain unclear. Here, we show that cytokinin signaling precedes expression in leaf axils and activates expression de novo in the leaf axil to promote axillary meristem initiation. Furthermore, type-B Arabidopsis response regulator proteins, which are transcriptional activators in the cytokinin signaling pathway, directly bind to the promoter and activate its expression. Finally, we show that cytokinin activation of in the leaf axil correlates with increased histone acetylation and methylation markers associated with transcriptional activation, supporting the fact that expression requires a permissive epigenetic environment to restrict it to highly defined meristematic tissues. Taken together, these findings explain how cytokinin regulates axillary meristem initiation and establish a mechanistic framework for the postembryonic establishment of the shoot stem cell niche.© 2017 American Society of Plant Biologists. All rights reserved.
[48]
Zhang T Q, Lian H, Zhou C M, et al. A two-step model for de novo activation of WUSCHEL during plant shoot regeneration. The Plant Cell, 2017, 29(5): 1073-1087.
[49]
Zubo Y O, Blakley I C, Yamburenko M V, et al. Cytokinin induces genome-wide binding of the type-B response regulator ARR10 to regulate growth and development in Arabidopsis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2017, 114(29): E5995-E6004.
[50]
Che P, Lall S, Nettleton D, et al. Gene expression programs during shoot, root, and callus development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Plant Physiology, 2006, 141(2): 620-637.
[51]
Banno H, Ikeda Y, Niu Q W, et al. Overexpression of Arabidopsis ESR1 induces initiation of shoot regeneration. The Plant Cell, 2001, 13(12): 2609-2618.
[52]
Kirch T, Simon R, Grünewald M, et al. The DORNROSCHEN/ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION1 gene of Arabidopsis acts in the control of meristem ccll fate and lateral organ development. The Plant Cell, 2003, 15(3): 694-705.
[53]
Matsuo N, Makino M, Banno H. Arabidopsis enhancer of shoot regeneration (esr)1 and esr2 regulate in vitro shoot regeneration and their expressions are differentially regulated. Plant Science, 2011, 181(1): 39-46.
The Arabidopsis ENHANCER OF SHOOT REGENERATION (ESR)1 and ESR2 genes are thought to play critical roles in in vitro shoot regeneration. In this study, we investigated the functions and expression patterns of ESR1 and ESR2 during shoot regeneration by using their mutants and promoter-reporter systems. Shoot regeneration efficiencies of esr1 esr2 double mutants from hypocotyl explants decreased drastically; although the effects on shoot regeneration of the esr1 single mutation were much less marked than those of the esr2 single mutation, especially from root explants, their effects were additive. We found that ESR1 was initially expressed 1 day after transfer onto shoot-inducing medium (SIM), compared with 4 days for ESR2 expression. These results suggest that the functions of ESR1 and ESR2 in shoot regeneration are not redundant, even though they encode similar transcription factors and the ESR2 gene substituted with an ESR1 coding region complements the esr2 mutation. We also found that ESR1 expression was localized to a small number of cells in the lateral root meristem (LRM)-like structures, and the ESR1-expressing cells appeared to proliferate to form shoot apical meristem (SAM)-like structures. Thus, ESR1 may be involved in the change of LRM to SAM in tissue culture.Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
[54]
Chatfield S P, Capron R, Severino A, et al. Incipient stem cell niche conversion in tissue culture: using a systems approach to probe early events in WUSCHEL-dependent conversion of lateral root primordia into shoot meristems. The Plant Journal: for Cell and Molecular Biology, 2013, 73(5): 798-813.
[55]
Cheng Z J, Wang L, Sun W, et al. Pattern of auxin and cytokinin responses for shoot meristem induction results from the regulation of cytokinin biosynthesis by AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3. Plant Physiology, 2013, 161(1): 240-251.
De novo organ regeneration is an excellent biological system for the study of fundamental questions regarding stem cell initiation, cell fate determination, and hormone signaling. Despite the general belief that auxin and cytokinin responses interact to regulate de novo organ regeneration, the molecular mechanisms underlying such a cross talk are little understood. Here, we show that spatiotemporal biosynthesis and polar transport resulted in local auxin distribution in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), which in turn determined the cytokinin response during de novo shoot regeneration. Genetic and pharmacological interference of auxin distribution disrupted the cytokinin response and ATP/ADP ISOPENTENYLTRANSFERASE5 (AtIPT5) expression, affecting stem cell initiation and meristem formation. Transcriptomic data suggested that AUXIN RESPONSE FACTOR3 (ARF3) mediated the auxin response during de novo organ regeneration. Indeed, mutations in ARF3 caused ectopic cytokinin biosynthesis via the misexpression of AtIPT5, and this disrupted organ regeneration. We further showed that ARF3 directly bound to the promoter of AtIPT5 and negatively regulated AtIPT5 expression. The results from this study thus revealed an auxin-cytokinin cross talk mechanism involving distinct intermediate signaling components required for de novo stem cell initiation and shed new light on the mechanisms of organogenesis in planta.
[56]
Efroni I, Mello A, Nawy T, et al. Root regeneration triggers an embryo-like sequence guided by hormonal interactions. Cell, 2016, 165(7): 1721-1733.
Plant roots can regenerate after excision of their tip, including the stem cell niche. To determine which developmental program mediates such repair, we applied a combination of lineage tracing, single-cell RNA sequencing, and marker analysis to test different models of tissue reassembly. We show that multiple cell types can reconstitute stem cells, demonstrating the latent potential of untreated plant cells. The transcriptome of regenerating cells prior to stem cell activation resembles that of an embryonic root progenitor. Regeneration defects are more severe in embryonic than in adult root mutants. Furthermore, the signaling domains of the hormones auxin and cytokinin mirror their embryonic dynamics and manipulation of both hormones alters the position of new tissues and stem cell niche markers. Our findings suggest that plant root regeneration follows, on a larger scale, the developmental stages of embryonic patterning and is guided by spatial information provided by complementary hormone domains. Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
[57]
Heyman J, Cools T, Canher B, et al. The heterodimeric transcription factor complex ERF115-PAT 1 grants regeneration competence. Nature Plants, 2016, 2: 16165.
Regeneration of a tissue damaged by injury represents a physiological response for organ recovery. Although this regeneration process is conserved across multicellular taxa, plants appear to display extremely high regenerative capacities, a feature widely used in tissue culture for clonal propagation and grafting. Regenerated cells arise predominantly from pre-existing populations of division-competent cells; however, the mechanisms by which these cells are triggered to divide in response to injury remain largely elusive. Here, we demonstrate that the heterodimeric transcription factor complex ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR115 (ERF115)-PHYTOCHROME A SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION1 (PAT1) sustains meristem function by promoting cell renewal after stem cell loss. High-resolution time-lapse imaging revealed that cell death promotes ERF115 activity in cells that are in direct contact with damaged cells, triggering divisions that replenish the collapsed stem cells. Correspondingly, the ERF115-PAT1 complex plays an important role in full stem cell niche recovery upon root tip excision, whereas its ectopic expression triggers neoplastic growth, correlated with activation of the putative target gene WOUND INDUCED DEDIFFERENTIATION1 (WIND1). We conclude that the ERF115-PAT1 complex accounts for the high regenerative potential of plants, granting them the ability to efficiently replace damaged cells with new ones.
[58]
Ledwoń A, Gaj M D. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 gene expression and auxin treatment in relation to embryogenic capacity of Arabidopsis somatic cells. Plant Cell Reports, 2009, 28(11): 1677-1688.
[59]
Ikeuchi M, Iwase A, Sugimoto K. Control of plant cell differentiation by histone modification and DNA methylation. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2015, 28: 60-67.
How cells differentiate and acquire diverse arrays of determined states in multicellular organisms is a fundamental and yet unanswered question in biology. Molecular genetic studies over the last few decades have identified many transcriptional regulators that activate or repress gene expression to promote cell differentiation in plant development. What has recently emerged as an additional important regulatory layer is the control at the epigenetic level by which locus-specific DNA methylation and histone modification alter the chromatin state and limit the expression of key developmental regulators to specific windows of time and space. Accumulating evidence suggests that histone acetylation is commonly linked with active transcription and this mechanism is adopted to control sequential progression of cell differentiation. Histone H3 trimethylation at lysine 27 and DNA methylation are both associated with gene repression, and these mechanisms are often utilised to promote and/or maintain the differentiated status of plant cells. Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
[60]
Holec S, Berger F. Polycomb group complexes mediate developmental transitions in plants. Plant Physiology, 2011, 158(1): 35-43.
[61]
He C S, Chen X F, Huang H, et al. Reprogramming of H3K27me 3 is critical for acquisition of pluripotency from cultured Arabidopsis tissues. PLoS Genetics, 2012, 8(8): e1002911.
[62]
Bellini C, Pacurar D I, Perrone I. Adventitious roots and lateral roots: similarities and differences. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 2014, 65: 639-666.
[63]
Verstraeten I, Schotte S, Geelen D. Hypocotyl adventitious root organogenesis differs from lateral root development. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2014, 5: 495.
Wound-induced adventitious root (AR) formation is a requirement for plant survival upon root damage inflicted by pathogen attack, but also during the regeneration of plant stem cuttings for clonal propagation of elite plant varieties. Yet, adventitious rooting also takes place without wounding. This happens for example in etiolated Arabidopsis thaliana hypocotyls, in which AR initiate upon de-etiolation or in tomato seedlings, in which AR initiate upon flooding or high water availability. In the hypocotyl AR originate from a cell layer reminiscent to the pericycle in the primary root (PR) and the initiated AR share histological and developmental characteristics with lateral roots (LRs). In contrast to the PR however, the hypocotyl is a determinate structure with an established final number of cells. This points to differences between the induction of hypocotyl AR and LR on the PR, as the latter grows indeterminately. The induction of AR on the hypocotyl takes place in environmental conditions that differ from those that control LR formation. Hence, AR formation depends on differentially regulated gene products. Similarly to AR induction in stem cuttings, the capacity to induce hypocotyl AR is genotype-dependent and the plant growth regulator auxin is a key regulator controlling the rooting response. The hormones cytokinins, ethylene, jasmonic acid, and strigolactones in general reduce the root-inducing capacity. The involvement of this many regulators indicates that a tight control and fine-tuning of the initiation and emergence of AR exists. Recently, several genetic factors, specific to hypocotyl adventitious rooting in A. thaliana, have been uncovered. These factors reveal a dedicated signaling network that drives AR formation in the Arabidopsis hypocotyl. Here we provide an overview of the environmental and genetic factors controlling hypocotyl-born AR and we summarize how AR formation and the regulating factors of this organogenesis are distinct from LR induction.
[64]
Pacurar D I, Pacurar M L, Lakehal A, et al. The Arabidopsis Cop 9 signalosome subunit 4 (CSN4) is involved in adventitious root formation. Scientific Reports, 2017, 7: 628.
The COP9 signalosome (CSN) is an evolutionary conserved multiprotein complex that regulates many aspects of plant development by controlling the activity of CULLIN-RING E3 ubiquitin ligases (CRLs). CRLs ubiquitinate and target for proteasomal degradation a vast number of specific substrate proteins involved in many developmental and physiological processes, including light and hormone signaling and cell division. As a consequence of CSN pleiotropic function, complete loss of CSN activity results in seedling lethality. Therefore, a detailed analysis of CSN physiological functions in adult Arabidopsis plants has been hampered by the early seedling lethality of csn null mutants. Here we report the identification and characterization of a viable allele of the Arabidopsis COP9 signalosome subunit 4 (CSN4). The allele, designated csn4-2035, suppresses the adventitious root (AR) phenotype of the Arabidopsis superroot2-1 mutant, potentially by altering its auxin signaling. Furthermore, we show that although the csn4-2035 mutation affects primary and lateral root (LR) formation in the 2035 suppressor mutant, CSN4 and other subunits of the COP9 complex seem to differentially control AR and LR development.

基金

* 国家自然科学基金(31370669)

PDF(1213 KB)

Accesses

Citation

Detail

段落导航
相关文章

/