|
|
The Application of Continuous Purification in Affinity Chromatography and Evaluation of Production Scale-up |
ZHANG Ling(),CAO Xiao-dan,YANG Hai-xu,LI Wen-lei |
Tasly Biophamaceuticals Co., Ltd., Tianjin 300410, China |
|
|
Abstract The rapid development of the biopharmaceutical industry, especially the increase in upstream expression and the expansion of scale, had promoted the perfusion culture for upstream. This also promoted the continuous purification strategy for the downstream purification process. In order to compare the purity and yield between batch purification and continuous purification, taking the perfusion of Fc fusion protein as an example, the experiment was carried out with BioSMB PD equipment, and on this basis, process scale-up and production cost evaluation were carried out. The continuous purification realized the continuity of perfusion culture and affinity chromatography. Compared with batch purification, the continuous purification process has many advantages. It can observably reduce the amount of the chromatography resin, improve the efficiency of packing, and reduce buffer used. The production efficiency is significantly improved. The production costs are significantly reduced.
|
Received: 22 February 2021
Published: 06 July 2021
|
|
Corresponding Authors:
Ling ZHANG
E-mail: linglong121@126.com
|
|
|
[1] |
Fisher A C, Kamga M H, Agarabi C, et al. The current scientific and regulatory landscape in advancing integrated continuous biopharmaceutical manufacturing. Trends in Biotechnology, 2019, 37(3):253-267.
doi: S0167-7799(18)30248-8
pmid: 30241924
|
|
|
[2] |
Pollock J, Ho S V, Farid S S. Fed-batch and perfusion culture processes: economic, environmental, and operational feasibility under uncertainty. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2013, 110(1):206-219.
doi: 10.1002/bit.24608
pmid: 22806692
|
|
|
[3] |
Klutz S, Magnus J, Lobedann M, et al. Developing the biofacility of the future based on continuous processing and single-use technology. Journal of Biotechnology, 2015, 213:120-130.
doi: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.06.388
|
|
|
[4] |
Konstantinov K B, Cooney C L. White paper on continuous bioprocessing may 20-21 2014 continuous manufacturing symposium. Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2015, 104(3):813-820.
doi: 10.1002/jps.24268
pmid: 25417595
|
|
|
[5] |
Moore C M V. Continuous manufacturing - FDA perspective on submissions and implementation. [2011-09-13]. http://www.pqri.org/workshops/SampleSize/Moore.pdf.
|
|
|
[6] |
Chatterjee S. “FDA Perspective on Continuous Manufacturing”, presented at IFPAC Annual Meeting. [2012-01-01].https://www.fda.gov/media/85366/download.
|
|
|
[7] |
US FDA. Draft guidance for industry: quality considerations for continuous manufacturing. [2019-02-01].https://www.fda.gov/media/121314/downloa.
|
|
|
[8] |
Bisschops M. BioSMBTM technology: continuous countercurrent chromatography enabling a fully disposable process. Biopharmaceutical Production Technology. Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, 2012: 769-791.
|
|
|
[9] |
Bisschops M, Brower M. The impact of continuous multicolumn chromatography on biomanufacturing efficiency. Pharmaceutical Bioprocessing, 2013, 1(4):361-372.
doi: 10.4155/pbp.13.46
|
|
|
[10] |
Godawat R, Brower K, Jain S, et al. Periodic counter-current chromatography:design and operational considerations for integrated and continuous purification of proteins. Biotechnology Journal, 2012, 7(12):1496-1508.
doi: 10.1002/biot.201200068
pmid: 23070975
|
|
|
[11] |
Aumann L, Morbidelli M. A continuous multicolumn countercurrent solvent gradient purification (MCSGP) process. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 2007, 98(5):1043-1055.
doi: 10.1002/(ISSN)1097-0290
|
|
|
|
Viewed |
|
|
|
Full text
|
|
|
|
|
Abstract
|
|
|
|
|
Cited |
|
|
|
|
|
Shared |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussed |
|
|
|
|